If you would like to post, you'll need to register. Note that if you have a BCG store account, you'll need a new, separate account here (we keep the two sites separate for security purposes).
Absolutely and no idea why they dont. I much prefer Arca Swiss and converted my Manfrotto heads to Arca Swiss. But looking around what other pros use and what's on the floor of the stores I visit, I see a lot of Manfrotos, so my guess is they can also do the reverse, put an RC2 style on the bottom of OEM feet. To make things more incoherent, Gitzo, which is a brand of Vitec and made on the same factory as Manfrotto sells Arca Swiss-style.
The pros I see out in the field all are using the Arca Swiss on the feet of their telephotos lenses. Maybe the reason you see the Manfrotto heads on the floor of the stores is because no one wants them?
I use Hejnar feet on my 500mm PF, 800mm PF and 400mm f/4.5. They screw directly into the collar on the lens so not into the foot. You remove the Nikon foot and put the Hejnar foot in its place.
Yeah, I wish more lenses come with Arca Feet; however, the gimbal head comes in varieties of dove tail angle, I guess Nikon doesn't want to be held liable.
Yep, no problems over the 5 years I have been doing this. I always use the foot, attach it to a Black Rapid strap, tripod, handhold, etc. I don't want to remove the foot in the field (guess some people do this?), so for me, it makes no sense that Nikon decided to use a design for rapid removal of the foot. And my gymbal head uses Arca so wanted the Arca grooves anyway. So the first thing I do with my new Nikon lens is remove its foot and put on a Hejnar one.
Tibor, thank you for the summary.Summary of posts since my last summary
I would like to add my own observation for Z 100-400 + Z9 + Leofoto. The combination of these three is very difficult to balance on gimbal head as it is body heavy. I have swapped to the original foot + Leofoto LEOFOTO PL-200 Arca Swiss plate for better balance. It still needs extra weight at the lens end to offset the heavy body. But the issue is not critical as the combo is still very light, it can be balanced by tightening the gimbal IMO. For Z8, any above mentioned options will behave better.
- Replacement foot is the same one for Nikon Z 70-200mm f/2.8 VR S & Z 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6 VR S.
- Posters recommended mostly
- Really Right Stuff Foot for NIKKOR Z 70-200mm f/2.8 VR-S Lens (and 100-400)
- Hejnar foot for Nikon Z 70-200/f2.8 S VR
- Kirk LP-70 Lens Foot for Nikon Z 70-200mm f/2.8 VR S & Z 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6 VR S Lens
- Leofoto NF-05
- Wimberley AP-501
- Cheapest of them all seems to be Leofoto right now
- Replacement foot using screws tend to loosen and need at least random checks to see if they are OK
- There is no reported difference between more expensive RRS foot and cheaper Kirk LP-70
- Those preferring fixed foot are recommending Hejnar
- Those having no issues with the one with a screw recommend RRS and Kirk.
- Loctite Blue 242 recommended for extra safety if using the foot like RRS or Kirk
For details see above.
Nimi, now you really piqued my interest.
Yes I have this foot on my Z100-400 and in fact I have replaced all of my Nikon OEM feet with Hejnar since the 500 pf.
The Hejnar foot doesRight now I have a plate attached to my 100-400 OEM foot. I was planning on buying a replacement foot (Kirk LP-70 preferred for the QD option) but the problem is that none of the replacement feet extend rearwards far enough to balance on a tripod head with the Z9, so I have no choice but to continue to use the plate (or trade the Z9 for a Z8....nahhh).
