Nikon Frustration

If you would like to post, you'll need to register. Note that if you have a BCG store account, you'll need a new, separate account here (we keep the two sites separate for security purposes).

Previously, Nikon has let its marketing and services decline, and then reacted to the ensuing crisis. A pertinent example was the loss of Nikon's public profile at the Beijing Olympics, and recovery by 2012. The leading Nikon executive who lead the revival of NPS later admitted it was vital for his division to listen to photographers' needs, and communicate these with engineers. It appears this is not the a singular case of Nikon failing to respect this fundamental rule of public relations. More and more today, the whims of internet forums and youtubers magnifies such failures by a high profile brand.

With reference to the above, an excerpt from an interview (in 2014) with a former Head of Nikon UK is revealing: Hidehiko Tanaka, Managing Director Nikon UK, Nikon Owners Mag 2014 No 46
“The Beijing Olympic Games, held in 2008, had been far from a success for Nikon in terms of their representation among the ranks of professional photographers, so in his role as worldwide head of NPS, the pressure to reverse the situation at the 2012 Games was enormous…. Opening ceremony of London 2012 more than 55% of the accredited professional photographers at the Games were using Nikon equipment.”

“As I have this sort of background, I believe I have a better understanding of the needs of photographers and of course I have very good connections to our headquarters, which enables me to pass on information to the relevant people. Luckily I have a very strong NPS team here in the UK and as I speak English I am able to communicate with both them and the professional photographers we support, so I receive direct feedback. When I was head of NPS in Japan we had regular meetings with professionals to discuss our products and seek ways of improving them. This is how features such as Ethernet connections and wireless transmission came about and, if you think of the size of the WT-4 Wireless Transmitter and then the much smaller size of its successor, the WT-5, this is one example of the progress such collaboration can deliver.”

The launch of competitive cameras must have been no less important for Nikon to regain its profile and market share. By London 2012, Nikon had released its new flagship - the D4, and obviously the excellent optics (exemplified by 14-24 f2.8G, 24-70 f2.8G, 70-200 f2.8G, 200 f2G, 300 f2.8G and more). Nikon also released the important D600 and D800 by the end of 2012. Fat from its sales of Point&Shoots and also more affordable DSLR kits, in those years Nikon obviously had the organization, drive and resources to diversify its camera lines rapidly by 2013 (after D4): D610, Df, then D810 and D750 with D4s (2014).
 
Last edited:
Previously, Nikon has let its marketing and services decline, and then reacted to the ensuing crisis. A pertinent example was the loss of Nikon's public profile at the Beijing Olympics, and recovery by 2012. The leading Nikon executive who lead the revival of NPS later admitted it was vital for his division to listen to photographers' needs, and communicate these with engineers. It appears this is not the a singular case of Nikon failing to respect this fundamental rule of public relations. More and more today, the whims of internet forums and youtubers magnifies such failures by a high profile brand.

With reference to the above, an excerpt from an interview (in 2014) with a former Head of Nikon UK is revealing: Hidehiko Tanaka, Managing Director Nikon UK, Nikon Owners Mag 2014 No 46
“The Beijing Olympic Games, held in 2008, had been far from a success for Nikon in terms of their representation among the ranks of professional photographers, so in his role as worldwide head of NPS, the pressure to reverse the situation at the 2012 Games was enormous…. Opening ceremony of London 2012 more than 55% of the accredited professional photographers at the Games were using Nikon equipment.”

“As I have this sort of background, I believe I have a better understanding of the needs of photographers and of course I have very good connections to our headquarters, which enables me to pass on information to the relevant people. Luckily I have a very strong NPS team here in the UK and as I speak English I am able to communicate with both them and the professional photographers we support, so I receive direct feedback. When I was head of NPS in Japan we had regular meetings with professionals to discuss our products and seek ways of improving them. This is how features such as Ethernet connections and wireless transmission came about and, if you think of the size of the WT-4 Wireless Transmitter and then the much smaller size of its successor, the WT-5, this is one example of the progress such collaboration can deliver.”

The launch of competitive cameras must have been no less important for Nikon to regain its profile and market share. By London 2012, Nikon had released its new flagship - the D4, and obviously the excellent optics (exemplified by 14-24 f2.8G, 24-70 f2.8G, 70-200 f2.8G, 200 f2G, 300 f2.8G and more). Nikon also released the important D600 and D800 by the end of 2012. Fat from its sales of Point&Shoots and also more affordable DSLR kits, in those years Nikon obviously had the organization, drive and resources to diversify its camera lines rapidly by 2013 (after D4): D610, Df, then D810 and D750 with D4s (2014).

Last week Dave Black told me directly that he was brought in by Nikon to talk with a large group of technicians and engineers about his experience with the Z7II. He talked for more than an hour about what it did well and the gaps, then spent more than an hour answering questions and discussing in more detail. He also talked directly with the engineer responsible for AF in the Z7II and they verified he had every setting just as they recommended. He has had a similar role with other cameras.

Vincent Versace provided similar feedback about direct involvement in the development of Nikon Studio NX. It's a 1.0 version of that software, and there is a long list of items to be fixed, modified, or added. But he still considers it the best RAW converter for Nikon files and it produces the best rendition of Nikon color. It is the front end of his workflow for all images that he edits.

With just these two conversations, it's pretty clear that Nikon is heavily engaged with professionals who use their equipment. They are both collecting feedback and involving them in the process. I'm sure there are other Nikon Ambassadors involved in a similar manner. Not all of them are from the US, and not every Ambassador has that kind of relationship.
 
Last week Dave Black told me directly that he was brought in by Nikon to talk with a large group of technicians and engineers about his experience with the Z7II. He talked for more than an hour about what it did well and the gaps, then spent more than an hour answering questions and discussing in more detail. He also talked directly with the engineer responsible for AF in the Z7II and they verified he had every setting just as they recommended. He has had a similar role with other cameras.

Vincent Versace provided similar feedback about direct involvement in the development of Nikon Studio NX. It's a 1.0 version of that software, and there is a long list of items to be fixed, modified, or added. But he still considers it the best RAW converter for Nikon files and it produces the best rendition of Nikon color. It is the front end of his workflow for all images that he edits.

With just these two conversations, it's pretty clear that Nikon is heavily engaged with professionals who use their equipment. They are both collecting feedback and involving them in the process. I'm sure there are other Nikon Ambassadors involved in a similar manner. Not all of them are from the US, and not every Ambassador has that kind of relationship.
Very encouraging news, to say the least. My money is on Nikon, and I don't mind waiting.
 
Very encouraging news, to say the least. My money is on Nikon, and I don't mind waiting.
Nikon tends to do things well, but seldom quickly. For the most part, their products are well thoughts and sold. I think that they have learned from a mistakes in the past when they rushed products too quickly.

IMO I think photographers will be more forgiving if a product is a bit late but sold when delivered as opposed to early and flakey.
 
Nikon tends to do things well, but seldom quickly. For the most part, their products are well thoughts and sold. I think that they have learned from a mistakes in the past when they rushed products too quickly.

IMO I think photographers will be more forgiving if a product is a bit late but sold when delivered as opposed to early and flakey.
I spent 30 years in the IT industry and can confirm that a solid delivery trumps on time, even though customers will always gripe about it being late.
 
I spent 30 years in the IT industry and can confirm that a solid delivery trumps on time, even though customers will always gripe about it being late.
My work life was in Agriculture Marketing and Sales for a Farm Machinery wholegoods and parts manufacturer and a an even longer time with the Idaho State Department of Agriculture. A bit different situation since the final customer, the farmer had relatively narrow windows to plant and harvest. If your product was solid but was late and missed the planting or harvest window solid did not matter.
 
I spent 30 years in the IT industry and can confirm that a solid delivery trumps on time, even though customers will always gripe about it being late.
I currently work on a team that correlates collected data with software to create a modeled data set that allows sensors to collect and read near-real-time data to make predictions on future events and drive automatic reactions to meet near future demands. When we get pressured to speed our delivery times and are asked how soon can you get this out the door to the customer, my reply is it all depends on how wrong they want it to go to the customer. Too many times project managers want speed over quality and end up driving an even later delivery.
 
I currently work on a team that correlates collected data with software to create a modeled data set that allows sensors to collect and read near-real-time data to make predictions on future events and drive automatic reactions to meet near future demands. When we get pressured to speed our delivery times and are asked how soon can you get this out the door to the customer, my reply is it all depends on how wrong they want it to go to the customer. Too many times project managers want speed over quality and end up driving an even later delivery.
Pick 2: good, cheap, fast
 
Newsflash:

just read that Miners in Chile are going on strike..
28% of world's copper (Cu - raw material) comes out of Chile..
previous strike lasted for 44 days..
-> so expect additional delays in the electronics market.
 
Copper in short supply, chips in short supply, shipping delays, it all adds up to lots of first world belly aching because we can't get our latest gizmo as fast as we'd like. :)
Oh NO!! :eek: Copper shortage - fewer electronics (toys), covid Delta - less travel (fun). Hopefully this will pass soon and I can return to spending my retirement savings (no kids so no guilt about spending)
 
My work life was in Agriculture Marketing and Sales for a Farm Machinery wholegoods and parts manufacturer and a an even longer time with the Idaho State Department of Agriculture. A bit different situation since the final customer, the farmer had relatively narrow windows to plant and harvest. If your product was solid but was late and missed the planting or harvest window solid did not matter.

And if a camera maker's product isn't available in time for spring migration (or, a once-in-a-lifetime trip) I'd look at other brands.
 
Well, to put all of our supply problems in perspective, I just found out that a friend from college who used to rib me about using Nikon gear (he used Canon) died yesterday.

Now, instead of wanting more gear, I'm regretting that we never got together for that photo trip we always talked about going on.
 
Last week Dave Black told me directly that he was brought in by Nikon to talk with a large group of technicians and engineers about his experience with the Z7II. He talked for more than an hour about what it did well and the gaps, then spent more than an hour answering questions and discussing in more detail. He also talked directly with the engineer responsible for AF in the Z7II and they verified he had every setting just as they recommended. He has had a similar role with other cameras.

Vincent Versace provided similar feedback about direct involvement in the development of Nikon Studio NX. It's a 1.0 version of that software, and there is a long list of items to be fixed, modified, or added. But he still considers it the best RAW converter for Nikon files and it produces the best rendition of Nikon color. It is the front end of his workflow for all images that he edits.

With just these two conversations, it's pretty clear that Nikon is heavily engaged with professionals who use their equipment. They are both collecting feedback and involving them in the process. I'm sure there are other Nikon Ambassadors involved in a similar manner. Not all of them are from the US, and not every Ambassador has that kind of relationship.
This seem to be a little late reaction.I doubt whether Nikon listened to the feed back about poor AF in Z models.Else they would not have again brough a lame duck AF Z2 series.
I myself had bought D 850 after reading poor reviews of Z 6 & Z 7.
Now I have more or less decided to go for A1 if firmware upgrade is not released soon to improve the AF .
The only reason I could not buy A1 was because there is no supply & expected by Oct end.Hence I will wait till then for Z ll firmware upgrade to improve the AF for buying Z 7 ll.( Z9 seems to be too far away)
 
This seem to be a little late reaction.I doubt whether Nikon listened to the feed back about poor AF in Z models.Else they would not have again brough a lame duck AF Z2 series.
I myself had bought D 850 after reading poor reviews of Z 6 & Z 7.
Now I have more or less decided to go for A1 if firmware upgrade is not released soon to improve the AF .
The only reason I could not buy A1 was because there is no supply & expected by Oct end.Hence I will wait till then for Z ll firmware upgrade to improve the AF for buying Z 7 ll.( Z9 seems to be too far away)
I ordered mine listed as back order and it took less than a week to receive one.
 
Back
Top