TC 1.4 II OR III, DOES IT MATTER?

If you would like to post, you'll need to register. Note that if you have a BCG store account, you'll need a new, separate account here (we keep the two sites separate for security purposes).

PAUL50

Well-known member
Supporting Member
Marketplace
I’ve just finished reading an interesting thread discussing the relative merits of purchasing the Nikkor 600 or 800mm lens. In the thread, there was discussion of the 1.4 TC and one comment suggested that the IQ of the III version was better than the II version. I seem to remember reading comparisons of the two that essentially concluded it was a draw. In fact, I think I recall Steve discussing the issue. I have the II version and am now wondering whether it’s worth switching to version III. Your thoughts would be appreciate?
 
I’ve just finished reading an interesting thread discussing the relative merits of purchasing the Nikkor 600 or 800mm lens. In the thread, there was discussion of the 1.4 TC and one comment suggested that the IQ of the III version was better than the II version. I seem to remember reading comparisons of the two that essentially concluded it was a draw. In fact, I think I recall Steve discussing the issue. I have the II version and am now wondering whether it’s worth switching to version III. Your thoughts would be appreciate?

I’ve used both TC’s, not much of a difference between the two but one ,which makes the last gen a bit better.
The III suffers from less CA and as a result it can be used at a longer shootingdistance.
Up to you to decide wether you want to pay the extra for a bit better performance. (But if you’re lucky your current TC plays above average together with your current lenses...)

Like @JANuser says be sure to look up wether the TC is compatible with your lenses.
 
To add to above on E lenses, and less CA, I recall my 0.02c on TCs and more links in this post. And this article recommended by @Thern in the same thread:

It is also worth reading Nasim's tests of the Nikkor telephotos, which cover TCs. Particularly the 300 f2.8G VRII and 400 f2.8E FL

and I recall Brad Hill did some tests compared the 2 TC14 versions. This question has come up in other threads.


And this review
 
Last edited:
I’ve just finished reading an interesting thread discussing the relative merits of purchasing the Nikkor 600 or 800mm lens. In the thread, there was discussion of the 1.4 TC and one comment suggested that the IQ of the III version was better than the II version. I seem to remember reading comparisons of the two that essentially concluded it was a draw. In fact, I think I recall Steve discussing the issue. I have the II version and am now wondering whether it’s worth switching to version III. Your thoughts would be appreciate?

A while back I read a review that compared the TCii with the TCiii and their conclusoion was that the TCiii was indeed better, but it was more noticeable on newer lenses. With older lenses there was not much between them. So it looks like the TCiii can take advantage of the improvements that the newer lens designs offer.

 
To add to above on E lenses, and less CA, I recall my 0.02c on TCs and more links in this post. And this article recommended by @Thern in the same thread:

It is also worth reading Nasim's tests of the Nikkor telephotos, which cover TCs. Particularly the 300 f2.8G VRII and 400 f2.8E FL

and I recall Brad Hill did some tests compared the 2 TC14 versions. This question has come up in other threads.

Thanks for the info.
 
Back
Top