If you really really cared about image quality under good light and shooting conditions, really liked mirrorless, and didn't worry that much about bird eye AF, frame rate, buffers, battery life, high speed memory cards, etc. would some non-flagship cameras be just as good as flagship cameras?
I shoot Canon but I'm interested in every brand you want to bring up. I'm hoping for something like the EOS R mark ii, if it ever becomes reality. Something around $2500 that I'd hope would be tops in IQ with around 30 megapixels but not necessarily other features. Would/could a camera at this level equal the image quality of a flagship?
I shoot Canon but I'm interested in every brand you want to bring up. I'm hoping for something like the EOS R mark ii, if it ever becomes reality. Something around $2500 that I'd hope would be tops in IQ with around 30 megapixels but not necessarily other features. Would/could a camera at this level equal the image quality of a flagship?