If you would like to post, you'll need to register. Note that if you have a BCG store account, you'll need a new, separate account here (we keep the two sites separate for security purposes).
I’ll take a look. I’m curious though if it could be your monitors brightness. On my screen it looks good. No blown highlights and I can see feather detail throughout. Obviously I’m looking at a full scale image at 8000 pixels across.Beautiful images, love the low shooting angle and the background. Nicely done!
You might try a touch of highlight recovery on those brighter white breast feathers to bring out some detail in those areas especially in the first and third shots.
I'm on my laptop now, but when I posted that comment I was on my calibrated BenQ photo editing monitor where I've set the brightness for print processing.I’ll take a look. I’m curious though if it could be your monitors brightness. On my screen it looks good. No blown highlights and I can see feather detail throughout.
Yeah, I wouldn't be surprised if some of that detail is lost in the image downsizing and jpeg conversion.Obviously I’m looking at a full scale image at 8000 pixels across.
Thanks, Tony.Extremely well done series. Congratulations.
Tony
That is very kind Joe, thank you.I would be proud to have those in my portfolio, very nicely done.
Joe
Beautiful shots Darwin!
@DRwyoming I believe I found the problem with the discrepancy. I do 90% of post-processing in LR and only use PS for more detailed work. I always use my Windows image viewer to downsize for posting and I believe it degrades the color and IQ more than if I had just brought it into PS to resize. Attached is a tight crop of image 3 using PS. You can see much better what I see on my screen. Thanks for the heads-up, in the future I am going to be using PS.Beautiful images, love the low shooting angle and the background. Nicely done!
You might try a touch of highlight recovery on those brighter white breast feathers to bring out some detail in those areas especially in the first and third shots.
Makes sense, the detail is clearly there!@DRwyoming I believe I found the problem with the discrepancy. I do 90% of post-processing in LR and only use PS for more detailed work. I always use my Windows image viewer to downsize for posting and I believe it degrades the color and IQ more than if I had just brought it into PS to resize. Attached is a tight crop of image 3 using PS. You can see much better what I see on my screen. Thanks for the heads-up, in the future I am going to be using PS. View attachment 23955
Thanks, Hatch!The only issue I see you having with these shots... not enough wall space! I'd print them large... great series all around.
Hatch
Lovely images Darwin, love the shorebirds!
Curious on the actual size of these guys and if they are migratory or endemic to your region?