If you would like to post, you'll need to register. Note that if you have a BCG store account, you'll need a new, separate account here (we keep the two sites separate for security purposes).

NorthernFocus

NorthernFocus

Well-known member
Supporting Member
Marketplace
Member's gallery
OK for purposes of this thread let's call a pano anything with 2x1 or greater aspect ratio. Vertical or horizontal qualify. I'll kick it off.

1) Adak Island
untitled-900-Pano-2.jpg
You can only see EXIF info for this image if you are logged in.


2) Eaglek Bay, Prince William Sound
DSC_3529-Pano_pers.jpg
You can only see EXIF info for this image if you are logged in.


3) Mount Illiamna(left) and Redoubt Volcano
Volcanoes pano-1a.jpg
You can only see EXIF info for this image if you are logged in.


4) Shoestring Cove, Prince William Sound
_8109420-Pano.jpg
You can only see EXIF info for this image if you are logged in.
 
Member's gallery
Member's gallery
Cas1234 said:
Beautiful, another great capture, time to take a hike and find something interesting to post. My quiver is empty :cry:
Click to expand...
Thanks - much appreciated! I should add that the photo of High Falls is a true panorama stitched together in Lightroom from 8 individual images. All the images were captured hand held because I'd been too lazy to hike in with my tripod....
I should go back and reprocess them using photolab and lightroom
Cheers, Alex
 
Member's gallery
1) Diamond Head - Oahu, Hawaii

hawaii_panorama-1.jpg
You can only see EXIF info for this image if you are logged in.


2) Yankee Stadium, Bronx, NY

yankee_stadium_pano-1.jpg
You can only see EXIF info for this image if you are logged in.


3) NYC Skyline (taken from NJ)

nyc_skyline-1.jpg
You can only see EXIF info for this image if you are logged in.


4) NYC Skyline (taken from NJ)

nyc_skyline-2.jpg
You can only see EXIF info for this image if you are logged in.
 
Member's gallery
Bear Lake, Rocky Mountain National Park, Colorado. Elevation approx 9500ft/2895m. November 2021
Nikon D850. Nikkor 28-300mm lens at 28mm; 1/200 sec, f/9, ISO 80.
Multi-shot handheld pano. Composited in LrC

BearLake-2.jpg
You can only see EXIF info for this image if you are logged in.
 
Member's gallery
Well done, Joe, especially hand held. Like how the log in the foreground leads to a focal point which I find to be an important element of a panorama. Good sky too.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JAS
Member's gallery
AlexY said:
... I should add that the photo of High Falls is a true panorama stitched together in Lightroom from 8 individual images...
Click to expand...
Actually the term "panorama" refers purely to the format irrespective of how it is produced. Technically images that are stitched are "composite" images. Which may or may not be in panoramic format. Back in the day before high resolution bodies came out I stitched images simply to increase resolution for purposes of having enough detail for large prints. They weren't necessarily wide/panorama format. The reason that I specified at least 2x1 aspect ratio at the beginning of the thread is because there's no agreed definition (that I'm aware of) of what actually constitutes a panorama. Arguably anything longer than the traditional 2x3 format. Or now maybe beyond 9x16?
a picture or photograph containing a wide view
Click to expand...
 
Member's gallery
MalcolmP said:
Well done, Joe, especially hand held. Like how the log in the foreground leads to a focal point which I find to be an important element of a panorama. Good sky too.
Click to expand...
Thank you. We plan to revisit several areas in RMNP this year and will carry a light tripod or maybe a monopod to capture this location and several others. Our daughter lives in Longmont, a short drive away. She is another photo geek.
 
Member's gallery
NorthernFocus said:
Actually the term "panorama" refers purely to the format irrespective of how it is produced. Technically images that are stitched are "composite" images. Which may or may not be in panoramic format. Back in the day before high resolution bodies came out I stitched images simply to increase resolution for purposes of having enough detail for large prints. They weren't necessarily wide/panorama format. The reason that I specified at least 2x1 aspect ratio at the beginning of the thread is because there's no agreed definition (that I'm aware of) of what actually constitutes a panorama. Arguably anything longer than the traditional 2x3 format. Or now maybe beyond 9x16?
Click to expand...
Good points....I do think of panoramas as wide format photos and was trying to differentiate between a cropped photo as opposed to a stitched series of photos to create a wide format image - rather imprecisely as it turned out. Composite is a better term, as I'm aware that wide format cameras capture panoramic images without the need to crop or stitch.
I like the panoramic format as it can add interest to an image. Thanks for starting this thread.
cheers, A.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.