If you would like to post, you'll need to register. Note that if you have a BCG store account, you'll need a new, separate account here (we keep the two sites separate for security purposes).

gordon_g

Well-known member
Supporting Member
So I took some advice yesterday and tried a new spot for some opportunities for some photos... (Thanks @DRwyoming ) It's been a while since I have seen a Monarch Butterfly so I couldn't pass this up.
ADSC_1150.jpg
You can only see EXIF info for this image if you are logged in.
 
Last edited:
I like the second better. There isn’t much difference between the 2 but the butterfly looks crisper in the second
.

I did the same thing as the other photo brought the background down a little bit. I did brighten the butterfly just a touch, I didn't do that on the other one. Now I'll have to play a little bit and see where the limits are..
 
Gordon
Sorry to come in late. Love these guys. #2 does it for me, the faded BG kicks butt. Long ago, I think, The New York School of photography had this sort of motto - the subject, only the subject and nothing but the subject. My words, but the idea stuck in my head.
Now, if I may, try to rotate the image so that it is diagonally across the frame with the wing point pointing to the left hand corner.
See what it does to impact and composition.
Again, just subjective
 
So I tried giving the butterfly and little more separation from the background, Which version is better? @Callie


View attachment 5305
Great capture Gordon and I also think the 2nd image is "crisper" plus Callie's suggestion to rotate the image may give a more pleasing composition---I often do this with my butterfly pics as a lot of them hang upside down to feed, which can lead to "lopsided" subject placement. I am quite happy to use "editorial licence" to change the perspective !
 
Godon, this is nice, and different, a much stronger POV. No, not what I meant. The rotation, not necessarily the thightnes of the crop shown.
Gordon.jpg
You can only see EXIF info for this image if you are logged in.
 
Last edited:
Gordon; Magnificent photo! Callie...I agree with you, but I wouldn't have eliminated so much of the beautiful background. But...that's photo....everybody has at least one opinion! :giggle:
 
Gordon.I also came in late .Great composition and details..I shoot butterflies and really do love them.I use Gaussian blur to get a really smooth background to pop the subject and blur the distracting background objects and that seems to make the subject look much better
 
Gordon.I also came in late .Great composition and details..I shoot butterflies and really do love them.I use Gaussian blur to get a really smooth background to pop the subject and blur the distracting background objects and that seems to make the subject look much better
The majority of this was (1st photo) pretty much straight out of the camera other then some sharping done. I agree as I have done that before as well... thanks for the suggestion!