200-500mm replacement.

If you would like to post, you'll need to register. Note that if you have a BCG store account, you'll need a new, separate account here (we keep the two sites separate for security purposes).

P

Petrphotosss

Active member
Member's gallery
Hello fellow wildlife photographers and gear enthusiasts,

Today is my last day of the Victoria road trip (I hope to share some great photos here soon). Unfortunately, my Nikon 200-500mm lens has jammed again—this time, the zoom mechanism is stuck, and one of the screws is lodged under the plastic, causing some damage. This issue has occurred before and was fixed under warranty, but now that the lens is out of warranty, I'm hesitant to spend a lot on repairs, knowing this problem could happen again.

So, I'm considering replacing it and would love to hear your recommendations. I'm currently using a Nikon D500 and plan to stick with it for now. My options include:

  • A Sigma/Tamron zoom lens
  • Nikon 300mm f/4 PF + 1.4x TC
  • Nikon 500mm f/5.6 PF
I'm leaning toward the 500mm PF, though it's the most expensive option. I'd really appreciate your thoughts on the best "bang for the buck" solution.

Thanks in advance!
 
Member's gallery
Petrphotosss said:
Hello fellow wildlife photographers and gear enthusiasts,

Today is my last day of the Victoria road trip (I hope to share some great photos here soon). Unfortunately, my Nikon 200-500mm lens has jammed again—this time, the zoom mechanism is stuck, and one of the screws is lodged under the plastic, causing some damage. This issue has occurred before and was fixed under warranty, but now that the lens is out of warranty, I'm hesitant to spend a lot on repairs, knowing this problem could happen again.

So, I'm considering replacing it and would love to hear your recommendations. I'm currently using a Nikon D500 and plan to stick with it for now. My options include:

  • A Sigma/Tamron zoom lens
  • Nikon 300mm f/4 PF + 1.4x TC
  • Nikon 500mm f/5.6 PF
I'm leaning toward the 500mm PF, though it's the most expensive option. I'd really appreciate your thoughts on the best "bang for the buck" solution.

Thanks in advance!
Click to expand...
If you’re sticking with F mount lenses and mostly use your 200-500 at its long end then yeah it’s hard to go wrong with the 500mm PF. It’s a fantastic light weight, high quality lens.

FWIW, I went from the 200-500 to a 500mm PF plus 300mm PF plus a 1.4x TC and still use that combo for my light weight hiking wildlife kit even after switching to mirrorless and have no regrets.
 
Member's gallery
DRwyoming said:
If you’re sticking with F mount lenses and mostly use your 200-500 at its long end then yeah it’s hard to go wrong with the 500mm PF. It’s a fantastic light weight, high quality lens.

FWIW, I went from the 200-500 to a 500mm PF plus 300mm PF plus a 1.4x TC and still use that combo for my light weight hiking wildlife kit even after switching to mirrorless and have no regrets.
Click to expand...
DRwyoming said:
If you’re sticking with F mount lenses and mostly use your 200-500 at its long end then yeah it’s hard to go wrong with the 500mm PF. It’s a fantastic light weight, high quality lens.

FWIW, I went from the 200-500 to a 500mm PF plus 300mm PF plus a 1.4x TC and still use that combo for my light weight hiking wildlife kit even after switching to mirrorless and have no regrets.
Click to expand...
Thanks for your answer, but why would you keep both the 500pf and 300pf with TC? 🙂
 
Member's gallery
Petrphotosss said:
Thanks for your answer, but why would you keep both the 500pf and 300pf with TC? 🙂
Click to expand...
For larger mammals like Moose and Elk I sometimes find 500mm too much and the 300mm PF is also fantastic for small, almost macro subjects like Dragonflies, Butterflies and amphibians with or without the 1.4x TC.

Since moving to mirrorless I’ll also occasionally use the 1.4 TC on the 500mm PF as the resulting f/8 lens still focuses fine on mirrorless bodies and the combo delivers crisp high quality images.

Sure, there’s not a lot of situations where I’ll shoot with the 300 mm plus TC at 420mm over the 500mm but it can be handy for approachable very small subjects due to the fantastic close focusing distance of the 300mm PF which doesn’t change with the TC added. But mostly those two lenses plus a TC make a versatile solution for a lot of wildlife situations spanning 300mm to 700mm in a lightweight kit.
 
Member's gallery
DRwyoming said:
For larger mammals like Moose and Elk I sometimes find 500mm too much and the 300mm PF is also fantastic for small, almost macro subjects like Dragonflies, Butterflies and amphibians with or without the 1.4x TC.

Since moving to mirrorless I’ll also occasionally use the 1.4 TC on the 500mm PF as the resulting f/8 lens still focuses fine on mirrorless bodies and the combo delivers crisp high quality images.

Sure, there’s not a lot of situations where I’ll shoot with the 300 mm plus TC at 420mm over the 500mm but it can be handy for approachable very small subjects due to the fantastic close focusing distance of the 300mm PF which doesn’t change with the TC added. But mostly those two lenses plus a TC make a versatile solution for a lot of wildlife situations spanning 300mm to 700mm in a lightweight kit.
Click to expand...
Okay, that makes sense. Sounds like a pretty neat combo
 
Member's gallery
soundbyte said:
The 200-500mm is quite easy to repair ( I've done three) and there is a thread that addresses how to go about it here.
If you don't want to go that route and stay with the D500 then I agree with @DRwyoming that the 500PF (still available new on nikon.com.au) is a great lens.
Click to expand...
Amazing! I'll give it a try before I start spending any money. That said, I have to point out that the design of the lens is really poor, and no one seemed to mention it in the reviews I watched before buying in 2021. It really makes you question the value of those reviews.
 
Member's gallery
DRwyoming said:
For larger mammals like Moose and Elk I sometimes find 500mm too much and the 300mm PF is also fantastic for small, almost macro subjects like Dragonflies, Butterflies and amphibians with or without the 1.4x TC.

Since moving to mirrorless I’ll also occasionally use the 1.4 TC on the 500mm PF as the resulting f/8 lens still focuses fine on mirrorless bodies and the combo delivers crisp high quality images.

Sure, there’s not a lot of situations where I’ll shoot with the 300 mm plus TC at 420mm over the 500mm but it can be handy for approachable very small subjects due to the fantastic close focusing distance of the 300mm PF which doesn’t change with the TC added. But mostly those two lenses plus a TC make a versatile solution for a lot of wildlife situations spanning 300mm to 700mm in a lightweight kit.
Click to expand...

I also have both the 300mm PF and the 500mm pf. I love the 300mm MFD and it stays the same with the 1.4tciii. It's really lightweight. I also like using it as a 300mm f4 for closer subjects.
The 500mm is stellar as well. I take it out around 60% vs the 300pf with 1.4tciii about 40%.
Both were purchased for use with my d500 and I took solace in the fact that so many kept theirs for use on modern mirrorless like a z8 or z9. I'm heading in that direction at some point.
I also have a tamron 150-600mm g2 but it almost never goes out despite being a nice lens. I just don't like carrying it after getting the PFs. I do miss it's reach however .
 
Member's gallery
My experience is similar to @DRwyoming except I have not moved on to mirrorless. I shoot a D500 with both the 500pf and the 300pf, using the TC14iii with both lenses at times. I typically use the 300pf as the long lens in my general photography kit, which consists of the Nikon 17-55 f/2.8, the Sigma 50-100 f/1.8, and the 300pf. I normally expect that I won't be doing birding when I go out with this kit, and expect to use the 300pf mainly for semi-macro shots. However, it is not unusual for me to end up needing a long lens and the 300pf + TC is a decent stand-in for the 500pf in those cases. BTW, the D500 handles focusing with the 500pf + TC very well and I am quite satisfied with the IQ of the combo. I should mention that, in the vast majority of my birding, I just use the central portion of the viewfinder for focusing and frame in post by cropping. If you fill the frame and compose in-camerra, your focusing satisfaction may be lower at times. FWIW
 
Member's gallery
Petrphotosss said:
Hello fellow wildlife photographers and gear enthusiasts,

Today is my last day of the Victoria road trip (I hope to share some great photos here soon). Unfortunately, my Nikon 200-500mm lens has jammed again—this time, the zoom mechanism is stuck, and one of the screws is lodged under the plastic, causing some damage. This issue has occurred before and was fixed under warranty, but now that the lens is out of warranty, I'm hesitant to spend a lot on repairs, knowing this problem could happen again.

So, I'm considering replacing it and would love to hear your recommendations. I'm currently using a Nikon D500 and plan to stick with it for now. My options include:

  • A Sigma/Tamron zoom lens
  • Nikon 300mm f/4 PF + 1.4x TC
  • Nikon 500mm f/5.6 PF
I'm leaning toward the 500mm PF, though it's the most expensive option. I'd really appreciate your thoughts on the best "bang for the buck" solution.

Thanks in advance!
Click to expand...
180-600mm you'll never look back
 
Member's gallery
soundbyte said:
The 200-500mm is quite easy to repair ( I've done three) and there is a thread that addresses how to go about it here.
If you don't want to go that route and stay with the D500 then I agree with @DRwyoming that the 500PF (still available new on nikon.com.au) is a great lens.
Click to expand...
Hi, I wanted to thank you for encouraging me to try fixing the lens myself. After some effort, I managed to remove the stuck screw. Unfortunately, it appears to be damaged and can’t be properly fitted back into its original spot. Nevertheless, I’ve decided to leave it out and move on. The lens is working just fine, even though the barrel is scratched up, and selling it is no longer an option. Thankfully, it should still serve me well for many more adventures!
 
Member's gallery
I went from the 200-500 (which never AFd accurately) to a Tamron 150-600mm G2. It wasn't brilliantly sharp at the long end but there was a lot to like about it - light, long, programmable focus range brackets.
The 500 PF replaced that and its sharpness was great; also relatively light and compact.
 
Member's gallery
Roaring 40s said:
I went from the 200-500 (which never AFd accurately) to a Tamron 150-600mm G2. It wasn't brilliantly sharp at the long end but there was a lot to like about it - light, long, programmable focus range brackets.
The 500 PF replaced that and its sharpness was great; also relatively light and compact.
Click to expand...
Luckily enough, I think that missed focus is mostly my fault rather than the lens, although sometimes I tend to think otherwise. The 500 PF is no doubt a brilliant lens, but I'll keep shooting with my zoom until it works—or until I get my house and kids sorted out.
 
Member's gallery
Petrphotosss said:
Luckily enough, I think that missed focus is mostly my fault rather than the lens, although sometimes I tend to think otherwise. The 500 PF is no doubt a brilliant lens, but I'll keep shooting with my zoom until it works—or until I get my house and kids sorted out.
Click to expand...
The rig is capable of good shots for sure. I won a national award with one.
 
Member's gallery
DBalaur said:
Happy to hear that you managed to repair it. Mine was jammed at 200mm so it was not extended enough for me to access the shrew using the regular repair method.
Click to expand...
Thank you. My lens was also jammed at 200mm, but since I had forced it to move before and the barrel was scratched, I just took the risk and forced it again to move it where I needed and it worked.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top