I'm still new to Lightroom and just figured out how to have multiple versions post processed from the same shot to decide which I like best. To that end, I did a shot of a hawk landing on a post...then left it for a bit and thought would it be better without the barbed wire....well, I got rid of the wire, then decided hey get rid of the post. Not realizing until I was totally done that I wasn't working with the same image !!!! One is landing talons open looking down at the post, the other about to land looking forward talons closed. Add to that I think I did a way better post processing job on the second (talons closed) shot as I have better clarity, color, contrast, etc. So, while this is not the same image processed differently, my question still rises. The shot without the fence post and barbed wire (to me) is technically a better shot....but the shot with the fence post and barbed wire seems to tell more of a story. Clearly I can go back and rework the fence post shot if I wanted to....leave the post and remove the barbed wire...or leave post and barbed wire.... I don't normally post images here as this sorta thing can be so subjective, but I really can't decide which I like the best. Kinda looking for some feedback on this one. I've been working pretty hard on backgrounds, poses, camera angles attempting to up my game a bit. I'm trying to have my images tell a story and not continue to go for that "Audubon shot".
You can only see EXIF info for this image if you are logged in.
You can only see EXIF info for this image if you are logged in.