Hello!
This occurred with me in practice the other day and wanted to make sure I was not missing something....
Conditions: daylight with ample lighting: Normally, I shoot Manual with Auto ISO when walking about the park. When taking Macro shots of flowers or other stationary objects, I often battle to select the right shutter speed to keep the ISO down. Once I find where the ISO is down and the exposure meter is centered I take the photo........
^ On accident, I switched to Auto Shutter Speed ( Is still controlled aperture) and it seemed great(!?) Why? Because it kept my ISO all the way down and picked shutter speed itself - often far more than I would have thought needed, and so high that even if I wanted to catch a person/kid in action it would have been more than fine. By doing so it kept everything well in balance. The results were ISO at its lowest and a well metered shot. So what am I missing here? I feel like there is a catch?
I understand that if someone is looking for an artistic shot in some way, they may want to be in control of that. I also understand that I am getting away with this due to great light. The camera might choose a shutter speed far too low in poor light resulting in blurry photos - especially with moving objects. In this situation you would need the ISO go high as to not sacrifice the shot potentially along with a shutter speed higher than the camera thinks you need.
But in bright sun or bright overcast auto shutter seemed to be the ticket for static objects - again unless I am missing something?
Thank you
This occurred with me in practice the other day and wanted to make sure I was not missing something....
Conditions: daylight with ample lighting: Normally, I shoot Manual with Auto ISO when walking about the park. When taking Macro shots of flowers or other stationary objects, I often battle to select the right shutter speed to keep the ISO down. Once I find where the ISO is down and the exposure meter is centered I take the photo........
^ On accident, I switched to Auto Shutter Speed ( Is still controlled aperture) and it seemed great(!?) Why? Because it kept my ISO all the way down and picked shutter speed itself - often far more than I would have thought needed, and so high that even if I wanted to catch a person/kid in action it would have been more than fine. By doing so it kept everything well in balance. The results were ISO at its lowest and a well metered shot. So what am I missing here? I feel like there is a catch?
I understand that if someone is looking for an artistic shot in some way, they may want to be in control of that. I also understand that I am getting away with this due to great light. The camera might choose a shutter speed far too low in poor light resulting in blurry photos - especially with moving objects. In this situation you would need the ISO go high as to not sacrifice the shot potentially along with a shutter speed higher than the camera thinks you need.
But in bright sun or bright overcast auto shutter seemed to be the ticket for static objects - again unless I am missing something?
Thank you