Blackbuck Antelope

If you would like to post, you'll need to register. Note that if you have a BCG store account, you'll need a new, separate account here (we keep the two sites separate for security purposes).

Wade Abadie

Well-known member
Supporting Member
Marketplace
Blackbuck Antelope are native to India, Sri Lanka, and Pakistan....but they are also raised on private ranches in the U.S. (primarily here in Texas). They are another conservation success story.

This is a photo I took of a beautiful mature male a few months ago.

Nikon D500
Sigma 150-600mm f/5-6.3 Contemporary
600mm
1/1600 sec
ISO 500

500_4558-2 (Custom).jpg
You can only see EXIF info for this image if you are logged in.
 
Nice to know.I hope they dont end up as meat .In India it is stritcly banned for hunting though poaching does happen

Actually, sustainable use (hunting) is the main reason these animals exist in Texas. There are numerous introduced species of animals in Texas that have been brought back from the brink of extinction, due to private ownership and carefully managed hunting (Scimitar Horned Oryx, Addax, Dama Gazelle, Pere David Deer, Arabian Oryx, Kenyan Mountain Bongo just to name a few).

There are tens of thousands of Blackbuck Antelope in Texas, which provides a valuable "backup plan" should the populations in their native land ever get too low. There are also free-range populations in Texas, as well as Argentina. I understand that hunting and consumption of wild game is not for everyone (particularly if it is for religious reasons). However, the positive impact on the conservation of many species through hunting is undeniable, and backed up by science.
 
Very nice, Wade.
Fossil Rim, by chance? We were there last week and saw a bunch of these beauties.

No, this was at a private ranch owned by a friend of mine.....near Centerville, TX.

I've never made it to Fossil Rim, but have always been curious about it. How was your visit? Is it actually enjoyable from a photographer's point of view.....or too many people? I know it is a well-run facility....just didn't know if it was worth visiting for photography.
 
How was your visit? Is it actually enjoyable from a photographer's point of view.....or too many people? I know it is a well-run facility....just didn't know if it was worth visiting for photography.

Wifey & I have been several times and enjoyed it. It's just over 2hrs form the house, so it makes for a long day but we've never been disappointed. Here's a couple from last week. I still have a ton of images to go through.

50313414791_5ba4f6dd55_o.jpg

50312606413_35d0c3d68b_o.jpg

50313273161_1c62652bef_o.jpg

50309419963_25751db7da_o.jpg

50309012267_bd2e3e6e4a_o.jpg
 
Actually, sustainable use (hunting) is the main reason these animals exist in Texas. There are numerous introduced species of animals in Texas that have been brought back from the brink of extinction, due to private ownership and carefully managed hunting (Scimitar Horned Oryx, Addax, Dama Gazelle, Pere David Deer, Arabian Oryx, Kenyan Mountain Bongo just to name a few).

There are tens of thousands of Blackbuck Antelope in Texas, which provides a valuable "backup plan" should the populations in their native land ever get too low. There are also free-range populations in Texas, as well as Argentina. I understand that hunting and consumption of wild game is not for everyone (particularly if it is for religious reasons). However, the positive impact on the conservation of many species through hunting is undeniable, and backed up by science.
Religion is not the reason for banning balckbucck hunting in India.It is due to rapid decline in their population since 1900.Cheetas & balckbuck hunting was rampant in India by the royal families & thanks to them Cheetas have totally vanished in India & blackbuck population has drastically reduced
I also saw that blackbuck hunting has become a trophy hunting in US with each costing 2000 $.This high price seems to deter hunting & hope it stays that way(refer https://biologydictionary.net/blackbuck/ )
By the way India does not allow any trophy hunting.Pakistan does & does attract lot of trophy hunting tourists.

Please also see report on https://www.bornfree.org.uk/articles/bth-conservation as to why trophy hunting does not lead to conservation
 
Religion is not the reason for banning balckbucck hunting in India.It is due to rapid decline in their population since 1900.Cheetas & balckbuck hunting was rampant in India by the royal families & thanks to them Cheetas have totally vanished in India & blackbuck population has drastically reduced
I also saw that blackbuck hunting has become a trophy hunting in US with each costing 2000 $.This high price seems to deter hunting & hope it stays that way(refer https://biologydictionary.net/blackbuck/ )
By the way India does not allow any trophy hunting.Pakistan does & does attract lot of trophy hunting tourists.

Please also see report on https://www.bornfree.org.uk/articles/bth-conservation as to why trophy hunting does not lead to conservation

Firstly, I respect your opinion, but the realities are not as you make them out to be. You are correct that Blackbuck can be hunted in Texas for an average fee of around $1,500 - $2,500. They are a very popular game animal here and one of the most affordable in Texas, due to their abundant numbers. The price of $2,000 you referred to is actually on the lower-end of what guided hunting costs in Texas. Even whitetail deer hunts can easily cost $5,000-$8,000. I honestly do not understand why India's Blackbuck population is in decline, unless it is because of human encroachment. Blackbuck reproduce very quickly, and can easily become overpopulated. If hunting Blackbuck was detrimental to their population, then why has their population in Texas increased from only a few dozen animals in the 1960's (when they were first introduced) to well over 30,000 animals today? No additional animals were brought here from overseas during that time.....and they were propagated by ranchers specifically for hunting, along with many other species (all of which have large healthy populations).

Second, Born Free is absolutely not a reputable source of information. They are a radical animal rights organization that is notorious for ignoring actual science and data, in exchange for emotion-based drivel. The term "trophy hunting" has been made up by anti-hunters in an attempt to make hunters look like blood-thirsty villains who shoot endangered species, chop off their heads, and leave the bodies to rot. The truth is.....I have been an avid hunter my entire life, I do not act this way, nor have I ever met another hunter that acts this way. Virtually all hunters around the globe are responsible, ethical people who harvest the meat from their kills and also take "keepsakes" from the hunt (such as antlers, horns, hides, etc....) This is not because they are barbarians, it is a way of commemorating the hunt, and showing respect to the animal by placing a part of it on display to serve as a memory (much like a photograph).

Hunting, when done responsibly and regulated properly, is absolutely an effective means of conservation. In the United States, hunters directly contribute approximately $1.6 Billion every year through license fees, permits, and taxes on hunting supplies (look up the Pittman-Robertson Act). Wildlife is a renewable resource that needs to be carefully managed, particularly with human populations growing in many parts of our world. Part of this management often times involves hunting as a tool. The sustainable-use conservation model has been used successfully on every continent with large mammals.

If you would like a reliable, credible source about why hunting is a valuable conservation tool, I recommend researching the topic more. One of the best sources for information is the IUCN (International Union for Conservation of Nature)....their web link is here: https://www.iucn.org/

Another good source is the USFWS (U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service).....their web link is here: https://www.fws.gov/

Two other reputable organizations that support hunting as a conservation tool (as supported by scientific data) are CITES (Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species) and the WWF (World Wildlife Fund).

Like I said in the beginning, I respect everyone's opinion. Hunting is certainly not an activity that everyone wants to participate in.....but it is very important that people understand the facts about hunting and its contribution to conservation, not just the emotional advertisements put out by animal rights activists.
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.
Back
Top