Macro for d500

If you would like to post, you'll need to register. Note that if you have a BCG store account, you'll need a new, separate account here (we keep the two sites separate for security purposes).

I am looking for a 24-70 macro or micro for d500. It doesn't have to be Nikon. It can be aftermarket as long as it's a good lens. It's not something I'm going to use everyday and it covers the only focal lengths that I'm not covered on at the moment. Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated so I can research them.
 
I am looking for a 24-70 macro or micro for d500. It doesn't have to be Nikon. It can be aftermarket as long as it's a good lens. It's not something I'm going to use everyday and it covers the only focal lengths that I'm not covered on at the moment. Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated so I can research them.
Which macro/micro lens to buy depends a lot on your subjects. For most nature/wildlife subjects you'll want something in the 100mm to 200mm range just for the working distance with longer being better for skittish, live subjects. There are 40mm and 60mm macro lenses available for DX cameras like the D500 but for true 1:1 macro work the working distance between the front of the lens and subject is very small, as in a couple of inches, which makes things difficult in terms of getting close and not blocking the light. That close working distance is fine for things like slide copying and copy camera work but not so great for nature macro work.

In the Nikon line up I'd strongly recommend the 105mm AF-S f/2.8 micro lens for nature work which is awesome on the D500 giving you the field of view of a 150mm macro lens at close focus distance.
 
Unfortunately I was thinking the same thing.well I already have that focal length covered $800 just for macro capabilities seems like a lot of money
 
Unfortunately I was thinking the same thing.well I already have that focal length covered $800 just for macro capabilities seems like a lot of money
There are alternatives to dedicated macro lenses. For instance adding a Canon 500D or Nikon 5T, 6T diopter to your existing lens in the 100mm-200mm range makes a great macro setup for a fraction of the cost of a new lens. It's basically like adding close up reading glasses to an existing lens. The downside is that you lose far focus capabilities when the close up diopter is mounted.
 
Thank you I'll check into that alternative cuz I have the 70 to 200 f 2.8 FL lens and it's exceptional lens and has pretty close focusing. Like I said I don't want you to make her enough that I can see spending $800 but I do use it occasionally.
 
hank you I'll check into that alternative cuz I have the 70 to 200 f 2.8 FL lens and it's exceptional lens and has pretty close focusing.
The Canon 500D in the 77mm filter thread size is a very good match to your 70-200mm f/2.8. It was my macro setup for Butterflies and small insects for many years and it's a very good high image quality solution.
 
The Canon 500D in the 77mm filter thread size is a very good match to your 70-200mm f/2.8. It was my macro setup for Butterflies and small insects for many years and it's a very good high image quality solution.
Will that actually fit a Nikon though being a canon product? I didn't think that their stuff was interchangeable
 
My preferred solution for using my 70-200 EFL for macro is a set of extension tubes. I've found the Vello's to perform better than the Kenko's. For whatever the reason, the Kenkos seem to loose electrical connection after a few uses. My Vello's are still ok after several years.
 
Will that actually fit a Nikon though being a canon product? I didn't think that their stuff was interchangeable
Yes, as Warren posted above it just screws onto the front of a lens just like a filter and fits any lens with the appropriate filter threads. I used a Canon 500D with 77mm filter threads on several generations of Nikkor 70-200mm (and the old 80-200mm) lenses and it works just fine. It's really no different than using something like a B&W or Hoya screw on filter.

There are a number of companies making close up diopters (aka close up filters) but the Canon and equivalent Nikon products are very high quality and deliver much better image quality than some of the inexpensive knock offs.
 
It's just a big filter, screws onto any lens with 77mm front threads.
I don't know what's going on with my mind today I didn't even think about it being a filter. And it is 77 mm because of my lens.thanks I'm having one of them days they changed my nerve pain medication and it makes me a bit dull
 
Yes, as Warren posted above it just screws onto the front of a lens just like a filter and fits any lens with the appropriate filter threads. I used a Canon 500D with 77mm filter threads on several generations of Nikkor 70-200mm (and the old 80-200mm) lenses and it works just fine. It's really no different than using something like a B&W or Hoya screw on filter.

There are a number of companies making close up diopters (aka close up filters) but the Canon and equivalent Nikon products are very high quality and deliver much better image quality than some of the inexpensive knock offs.
Thank you for the information. I wasn't even thinking about it being a filter
 
Yes, as Warren posted above it just screws onto the front of a lens just like a filter and fits any lens with the appropriate filter threads. I used a Canon 500D with 77mm filter threads on several generations of Nikkor 70-200mm (and the old 80-200mm) lenses and it works just fine. It's really no different than using something like a B&W or Hoya screw on filter.

There are a number of companies making close up diopters (aka close up filters) but the Canon and equivalent Nikon products are very high quality and deliver much better image quality than some of the inexpensive knock offs.
I just looked and I cannot find the canon 500d in 77 mm but I can find the 250d also the only thing I can find in 77 mm other than that is a hoya set and it's the only thing that gets any kind of good reviews. Will I be better off going with the 250d?
 
I just looked and I cannot find the canon 500d in 77 mm but I can find the 250d also the only thing I can find in 77 mm other than that is a hoya set and it's the only thing that gets any kind of good reviews. Will I be better off going with the 250d?
Marumi also makes quality achromat close up filters. They are easily found on Amazon if you cannot fine them at your favorite store.

--Ken
 
I found the Canon 500d. It's a bit pricey but very good reviews. Sounds like it's well built and does a really great job. I'll probably order it Monday morning.
 
Unfortunately I was thinking the same thing.well I already have that focal length covered $800 just for macro capabilities seems like a lot of money
My go to macro lens has been the Sigma 105mm OS. Using it with the group AF focus mode and limiter, it can easily compensate for back and forth movements when shooting close to 1:1.
Optically it‘s on par with the Nikon 105 but it’s 300$ cheaper.
Only downside it would be that it’s a chunky monkey so taking it with you in the bag is a serious commitment.

Around the same price you can find the Nikkor 85mm f3.5 DX micro which is about 400g and also a solid performer.

I would rather get a dedicated macro lens than fiddle with filters and extension rings...
 
I don't shoot that much macro at all. Occasionally I'd like to get a little closer to something but I don't need to spend the money on a dedicated macro lens when I already have my focal range covered from 18 mm to 500 mm. I do know that the sigma lenses are chunky. I have an 18 - 35 f1.8 that I use for Astro for photography. It's heavy. it came with the lens but I was lucky I didn't have to use the sigma dock. It was closer than some of the Nikon lenses that I bought in auto focus
 
I don't shoot that much macro at all. Occasionally I'd like to get a little closer to something but I don't need to spend the money on a dedicated macro lens when I already have my focal range covered from 18 mm to 500 mm.
If you're not actually going to shoot 1:1 macro or close to it and just want a little closer focusing out of your existing lenses then an extension ring makes more sense than a close up diopter. With a diopter attached your far focus is heavily limited as in 30cm to maybe 50cm for the farthest subjects down to something like 5cm from the front of your 70-200mm lens. That can be great for actual macro subjects but if you just want closer focusing for something like backyard birds then the diopter approach isn't great. A close up diopter is basically like adding reading glasses to your lens and allows very close focus but at the cost of losing normal to far focus.

To just bring in your close focusing a bit an extension ring is generally a better way to go as there's no optical impact at all and it just allows existing lenses to focus a bit closer. If you just add a bit of extension, for instance adding say 36mm to a 500mm lens or adding just 12mm to a 200mm lens you'll pull in your close focus a bit, still have fairly far focus capability but while the tube is in use you'll lose actual infinity focus for subjects very far away.

The big advantage of a dedicated macro lens beyond the fact that they tend to be some of the best lenses out there optically, is that you get super close macro focusing but don't lose far and infinity focusing. You pay for that convenience but that's one big advantage of going to a dedicated macro/micro lens.

If you think you'll explore more macro work then the diopter approach can work and work well but if you just want to bring in your close focus distance a bit but still retain medium to longer range focus then either extension tubes or dedicated macro lenses make more sense.
 
I may get into more macro work later. My 70-200 focuses at 3 ft. If I'm going to shoot what I want to shoot close up a flower or anything like that then I'm concentrating on that and that's what I'll shoot. I have no desire to work with extension tubes. I've already decided I'm going to try it out with the diopter lens. Thank you everybody for your input
 
I may get into more macro work later. My 70-200 focuses at 3 ft. If I'm going to shoot what I want to shoot close up a flower or anything like that then I'm concentrating on that and that's what I'll shoot. I have no desire to work with extension tubes. I've already decided I'm going to try it out with the diopter lens. Thank you everybody for your input
Just to reiterate what @DRwyoming just stated above, the diopter is going to give you a very limited focus range to work with. If that specific range works for you then you are good to go. But if you are trying to frame a shot of a flower or cluster of flowers, you are only going to have a limited amount of range to work with, and that may or may not align with how you want to frame your subject. An extension tube will probably give you a larger range of focus to work with and frame a shot. Then again, it is probably a bit easier to mount a close-up filter as it is just a screw on/screw off. The extension tube will require that you remove the lens. Not really a big deal, but not ideal in windy or wet conditions.

--Ken
 
24-70 is an odd range for a macro these days. Tamron and others used to do macro zooms but the seemed yo fall from favour. Most macros these days are fixed focal lengths. If you want a good value macro consider the Tokina 100 mm. Hard to pick image quality difference from the Nikon 105 mm. Anything much shorter than 100 mm you gave close lens to subject distances and a risk of shadows.
 
Back
Top