Nikon Z series 14-24 F/2.8 and 50 F/1.2 announced

If you would like to post, you'll need to register. Note that if you have a BCG store account, you'll need a new, separate account here (we keep the two sites separate for security purposes).

Steve

Admin
Staff member
Supporting Member
Marketplace
For the Nikon Z shooters out there, thought you might like to see this.

14-24 F/2.8 ($2400)

They say it's like 30% lighter than the F mount and it takes filters without adapters. If I was doing more landscapes, I'd be all over this.

50 F/1.2 ($2100)

Any takers on either lens?
 
Any takers on either lens?
The 14-24 looks like a killer lens for landscape and astro work if it delivers on their coma and astigmatism claims. Taking filters is great but holy cow, 'takes standard 112mm filters...." that's a heck of a front mounted filter :)

Both of these appear to really leverage the power of the Z mount which is nice to see.
 
That 50 1.2 sure would be a nice addition to my z7 but at $2100 I will pass. Especially considering how good the 50 1.8s is.
I wish they would work on the other end of the spectrum. A nice 150-400 f4 in "S" quality glass would bring out my wallet.
 
For sure in a while for the 14-24! I am also very impatient to see the improvements for wildlife photography on the Z6S and Z7S as soon as they will be released, before diving in the world of mirrorless cameras.
 
Nice to see but I would rather see the 100-400 and the 200-600. I have only twice used a lens shorter than 200mm in 2020 with the exception of my 105 Micro.
 
Potentially interested in the 14-24. But for now, pretty happy with my 50 mm 1.8 and 14-30 mm in Z mount on my Z7/Z6. And they are much lighter and smaller.
 
The Z system optics are on target. This trio of fast Dragons are arguably the best made to date: Not only superb optics in their own right, but especially with the flexibility enabled for filters on the 14-24, and TCs on the 70-200. Collectively, Nikon have also pruned the net weaight of the set :) https://www.zsystemuser.com/nikon-z-system-news-and/the-2020-z-lens-lineup-is.html

I'm yet another also watching and waiting for the 2nd gen of Z cameras. At minimum, if they are going to sell for wildlife, these must match : (1) capabilities of a D850 ie at least the AFC prowess of the D5 AF engine: even better if AFC is closer to the D6; (2) the Z6s/Z7s must have a grip (ie taking ENEL18) and (3) above all, pack the full house of Custom Menu options. All for the better if Nikon add more Fn/AF buttons to match the D6, and equally options to exploit Recall Custom Functions etc. [Brad Hill posted a more complete list recently]

WRT optics, these Z system engineers are fairly explicit about Nikon's priorities in this interview, published in March. The 2nd part is mainly about the 58 f0.95 Noct but includes a couple of telling snippets. A couple of intriguing hints about extending the diversity of Z Nikkors, which exploit the optical advantages of the new mount.


Clearly, this younger generation of "lensigneers" have their act together (pity about Nikon marketing!).
Once we have the 24-105 S, it should pair rather well with the 14-30 f4S for many wildlife photographers (travellers too). We also have the compact 24-200 f4.5/6.3 in the Z system, which is the closest upgrade to the excellent nifty 28-200 G [AFD], which is still the smallest FX made in its class. I use this as the main kit zoom on my D780.
The 100-400 S will be a keystone lens for wildlife. It is probably going to cost a rather large chunk of £3k! If it's only f3.5/5.6 then it would probably be better to use the 70-200 f2.8S with TC2-Z. As the feedback is the new Z-Nikkor TCs are excellent. Far better if we have the option of a 100-400 f4S, which could manage on 105mm filters, but a rear internal will be ideal (as in the exotics). As with the 500 PF and 200-500 etc, the hood blocks access to a CPL. (Nikon messed with the huge front filter! The showstopper on the otherwise excellent 120-300 f2.8E, it's useless in the tropics, and for water sports etc .)
 
Last edited:
Back
Top