I have a refurbished Nikon Z 70-200mm purchased awhile back directly from Nikon that I had not used. Upon reviewing a series of photos that I had taken recently, I observed a level of edge falloff that seemed excessive to me compared to the falloff of my adapted VR 70-200 f2.8E. I took the attached photos from a tripod at a distance of 4'. I measured the distance between the front elements and the target, and there was no more than .5" difference in target to lens difference. The focal plane distance remained unchanged. It is obvious that the falloff of the Z lens is greater than in the E lens, however the Z lens is producing a much wider field of view at the same stated focal length. All literature states the FTZ adapter doesn't affect focal length or field of view, so I am at a loss to explain this. I had observed a similar, although less pronounced issue with my adapted 24-70/2.8 E vs native 24-70/2.8 Z mount which I had previously chalked up to lens variation. To achieve the equivalent level of zoom in lightroom, the Z image needed to be viewed at 110% to achieve the equivalent FOV of the 100% E lens. Thanks!
Nikon Z9
Nikon Z 70-200mm f/2.8 VR S
Nikon VR 70-200 f/2.8E
The EXIF information reports both images as 8256x5504.
Nikon Z9
Nikon Z 70-200mm f/2.8 VR S
Nikon VR 70-200 f/2.8E
The EXIF information reports both images as 8256x5504.