StefanSC
Well-known member
In the whirlwind of the Sony A1's launch, I saw a comment that caught my eye, regarding one of Fuji's "small medium format" cameras:
And this comment reminded me of Nick Brandt (and I thank you dtibbals for this). Of what I know of him, he shoots wildlife with a Pentax 67. Talk about not the right camera for shooting wildlife.
This got me looking dumbfounded at his images (https://www.nickbrandt.com/portfolio.cfm?nK=7617&nS=2) as I find they have a haunting beauty about them for the last half an hour.
Also, this got me asking myself if we aren't too much "gear focused" and "focused on getting the subject", instead of defining our vision and then choosing gear and means of execution?
I mean...shouldn't the purpose define the means? And doesn't that mean that there is no such thing as a "right camera"?
Also, doesn't that mean that, being focused on gear, we end up with rather same-looking images?
Not the right camera for shooting wildlife.
And this comment reminded me of Nick Brandt (and I thank you dtibbals for this). Of what I know of him, he shoots wildlife with a Pentax 67. Talk about not the right camera for shooting wildlife.
This got me looking dumbfounded at his images (https://www.nickbrandt.com/portfolio.cfm?nK=7617&nS=2) as I find they have a haunting beauty about them for the last half an hour.
Also, this got me asking myself if we aren't too much "gear focused" and "focused on getting the subject", instead of defining our vision and then choosing gear and means of execution?
I mean...shouldn't the purpose define the means? And doesn't that mean that there is no such thing as a "right camera"?
Also, doesn't that mean that, being focused on gear, we end up with rather same-looking images?