sid_19911991
Well-known member
According to Matt Granger, stacked sensors have 1 stop worse performance than traditional sensors. Based on my experience of using Sony A9 i, I guess that's true.
To my eyes, the Z9 starts getting a faint green cast from ISO 400 & is quite apparent at ISO 3200 onwards, while Z6 & Z7 holds up well. At ISO 6400, the chroma noise on Z9 is bad, IMO.
None of the cameras have any luminance noise issue. Z9 is sharper than Z6 which has an AA filter, but perhaps a tiny bit less sharp than Z7.
What do you think folks?
Also, Ricci confirms that the Z 100-400 is sharper than the F mount 180-400.
To my eyes, the Z9 starts getting a faint green cast from ISO 400 & is quite apparent at ISO 3200 onwards, while Z6 & Z7 holds up well. At ISO 6400, the chroma noise on Z9 is bad, IMO.
None of the cameras have any luminance noise issue. Z9 is sharper than Z6 which has an AA filter, but perhaps a tiny bit less sharp than Z7.
What do you think folks?
Also, Ricci confirms that the Z 100-400 is sharper than the F mount 180-400.
Last edited: