AJCaiado
New member
I have a 200-500 lens and was thinking about buying the 500 PF. I just run a 'side-by-side' test paired with D500 and both performed similarly. IQ is quite the same and therefore I gave up investing in the 500 PF.
If you would like to post, you'll need to register. Note that if you have a BCG store account, you'll need a new, separate account here (we keep the two sites separate for security purposes).
You can only see EXIF info for this image if you are logged in.
|
You can only see EXIF info for this image if you are logged in.
|
You can only see EXIF info for this image if you are logged in.
|
In my opinion, I don't think that those small advantages worth paying almost 3x the price of the 200-500mm. I am looking for other options, if any! Suggestions appreciated!I am very happy with the image quality I get from my 200-500mm. Maybe I got one of the better samples of it. My 500mm PF is sharper, but I would not say you would notice unless pixel peeping or printing really large. What I noticed right away is the weight difference, the AF acquisition speed, and just how much easier it is to handle when tracking something like a bird or running dear. To me, it is worth it for those reasons.
A major issue is weight for someone approaching 70 or someone with other limitations. The 500 PF is about 30oz/840g lighter than the 200-500. That is a big difference when handholding the lens. I expect to use my 200-500 more on a tripod these days and the 500 PF for walking around. For me, it is a worthwhile purchase. Best wishes in finding what will work best for you.In my opinion, I don't think that those small advantages worth paying almost 3x the price of the 200-500mm. I am looking for other options, if any! Suggestions appreciated!