Not in Kruger ;-)Just take care in Africa, any form of camo can get you in serious trouble, especially in Central Africa. In South Africa wearing camo is safe.
If you would like to post, you'll need to register. Note that if you have a BCG store account, you'll need a new, separate account here (we keep the two sites separate for security purposes).
Not in Kruger ;-)Just take care in Africa, any form of camo can get you in serious trouble, especially in Central Africa. In South Africa wearing camo is safe.
Better not to wear any camo as general rule but camo is widely used for hunting and in hides in SA.Not in Kruger ;-)
I do not have a favorable perception of people in camo clothing. It comes across as an affectation and going with solid muted colors provides 20x as many choices. What has always struck me as funny are camo products like flashlights and underwear, but they evidently sell quite well.
A coworker of my wife traveled extensively in Mexico where he photographed the caves. He advised not wearing jewelry or an expensive watch and clothing that would allow one to blend in with the locals. I have found his advice worth following as it makes it easier to approach the locals in an area.
Most of what I have learned about wildlife is that they are likely to be spooked by the movement of a person and that even a poncho or camo blanket that breaks up the outline can be very effective. Sitting still is effective regardless of what one happens to be wearing. More important to avoid light colored clothing that attracts ticks.
A belted kingfisher is a universal one. It took me 3-4 years of trial and error to get photos of one. Also, in the South, ducks, deer, turkeys, etc. are hunted aggressively and will not allow you to get close if they're aware of your presence. Full camo is required. The same was often true of songbirds. It's a different world when shooting animals in urban areas or national parks that are habituated to people.I remember being in Africa and watching a group of tourists one of whom was wearing a white shirt and noticed how it really stood out as not looking natural. The guide commented on it saying that wearing bright unnatural clothing can make wildlife more skittish especially mammals. Apparently birds not so much. I still prefer drab brown or gray clothing when in the field.
I'm from Buffalo so cold isn't even in our vocabulary. This is standard winter garb, and as the temperatures warm we start shedding clothing.Thought it might be interesting for others to share the type and/or brand of clothes we wear when we are out in nature capturing our photos.
This can of course be in tropical Asia, the scorching heat in a desert region or in a freezer somewhere in Canada, Wyoming or Arctic regions.
1. General climate
Indeed, not in a place that is too hot or too cold. This is where I love wearing hiking pants and have pants from Lundhags, Beyond Nordic, Revolution Race and Vaude.
Depending on the terrain is that a pair of Meindl high shoe or a lower hiking shoe from Revolution Race.
Currently either wearing cotton polo shirts or cotton long sleeve shirts but on the look for shirts and polos with technical fabrics.
Hard shell jackets I have Fjallraven, RAB and Snickers, each with their own usage.
A softshell from Mammut
2. Hot & humid
I dislike shorts so I go for light hiking or walking pants from the same brands as above.
Polo shirts are currently been tested but like my Craghopper long sleeve shirts to keep the mosquitos away and they are fast drying.
3. Extreme cold
When temperature is to drop to -20C or below is that time to take out the serious warm clothing.
- Long Johns from Woolpower
- Insulated trouser from Jack Wolfskin
- Water resistant trouser/pants from Sprayway (Hydrolite)
- Basic layer from Woolpower or Icebreaker
- Mid layer from Woolpower
- Soft shell from Mammut or Schöffel
- Hardshell from RAB
- Down jacket from RAB
- Beanie from Devold
- Gloves from Hestra, Valleret or Inuheat
- Socks from Woolpower
- Boots from Muck Boots, model Artic Ice
I was an avid bow hunter for years. In Texas, most of that was from a pop up blind. The inside is black, so my camouflage is a black shirt and face cover. When we would hunt elk in Wyoming and Colorado, we wore camouflage because we were moving and calling. The last elk that I took with a bow was walking straight toward me. He was looking for the caller that was 60-70 yards behind me. The bull was at 12 yards when I released my arrow. I was standing up in an opening. Had I moved at all, he would have seen me. Our biggest issue when attempting to have animals close up is human scent. Have to play the wind. Blending into the environment and minimizing movement are important as well.I’m curious what one is photographing where full camo is required. I would think a blind and good field craft would serve except in the most extreme cases. I’m no longer a hunter so I can’t speak for the need in that case.
I’m curious what one is photographing where full camo is required. I would think a blind and good field craft would serve except in the most extreme cases. I’m no longer a hunter so I can’t speak for the need in that case.
I have photographed all of these subjects as I live in Alabama. I’ve done ducks from my Car and with kingfisher I find the best way is wait for them to come to you. You cannot get close going to them in any type of clothing, the movement will scare them. Same goes for wild turkeys where usually it’s a chance encounter. No doubt there are places where it is more difficult but in Alabama everything is a target. I don’t generally have too much trouble with songbirds, just being where they are is the hardest part for me. Bosque Del Apache is great for ducks and turkeys As is Louisiana. I dont know of any of the serious photographers in my area who wear camo. I would be tempted to say if one really needs camo then maybe a different location might offer a better option.
I have very little experience shooting abroad, although I did shoot birds in Iceland a couple summers ago. Of course, camouflage was unnecessary there. Camouflage is also generally unnecessary where I live now, although it is necessary when I try to shoot waterfowl that is hunted and not habituated to people. My only point is that there are lots of places and subjects in the US for which camouflage is necessary. In my experience, however, most photographers shy away from those places and subjects for perfectly logical reasons--it's hard and time consuming to come away with decent photographs in those places and of those subjects. It is much easier and more productive to go to places where animals are habituated, and one can just walk right up to the preferred subject. I do it all the time now myself, but I still find the more difficult subjects to be more fulfilling.Sounds like we’re getting into a pissing match here so I’m gonna bow out. For the record I never photograph in a zoo or park but I do go to National and state parks where birds can be found. If you feel you need camo go for it. I couldn’t care less. All I was saying was that there are countries where they will not take kindly to you wearing camo. That I have run into in my past travels. Take it or leave it.
Ahhh. Hemingway w/cameraRecent shoot for a surfboard brand in the tropics: shorts, flip-flops, scarf, l/s tee and a Stetson.Cigar (not shown) to keep the flies at bay.
View attachment 89547
More like Bukowski, but yes on the shirt.Ahhh. Hemingway w/camera… Nimi has the smarts to wear a long-sleeve shirt. Nothing can ruin your trip like a sunburn
…. Cover up in the tropics and beaches.
![]()