That’s not a collar...... this is a collar......
You can only see EXIF info for this image if you are logged in.
If you would like to post, you'll need to register. Note that if you have a BCG store account, you'll need a new, separate account here (we keep the two sites separate for security purposes).
I have never met a lens with an external collar where the rotation is smooth enough for a gimbal. I've owned Tamrons, Nikon 300 f4 AFS, 80-400s both, 200-500, Canon 100-400IS, Canon 400 f5.6, and on.. while some collars were slightly better refined than others and all were suitable for "locked-down" photography, loosening the collar never produced the fluid rotation that a non-removable collar could.I am using the iShoot. The collar did not improve the rotation on my copy of the lens. Perhaps it is just a design anomaly of the lens design - a lopsided lens exterior at the collar attachment point??
To be clear, I'm fine with the 180-600 collar, as use has reduced the rough friction... it's just not well suited to a gimbal like the 800PF or 400mm lenses.I just now loosened the clamp a tad and rotated the 180-600 back and forth, seems fine to me. Took a couple steps to the 600 PF and did it again, and yes, it is a slight easier to rack the set but not much, my opinion. Both are on the Wimberley Gimbal II heads. I'm content. Other than the missing gimble clamp foot. First time I have tried it, I very seldom rotate the cameras to vertical.
the rotation of the z70-200 is really smooth. So was the rotation on the F 200-500 ... so my expectations are high. I use the lens on a monopod, so that when I swing the thing left/right then the camera must rotate to keep the image horizontal, This is not like with a landscape where the camera might be rotated 90º.I have never met a lens with an external collar where the rotation is smooth enough for a gimbal. I've owned Tamrons, Nikon 300 f4 AFS, 80-400s both, 200-500, Canon 100-400IS, Canon 400 f5.6, and on.. while some collars were slightly better refined than others and all were suitable for "locked-down" photography, loosening the collar never produced the fluid rotation that a non-removable collar could.
While I applaud the manufacturers for producing lenses that can reduce weight, I think that any lens that goes to 500mm and beyond should have an integrated collar...
Bottom line for me, the 180-600 will not be used with my gimbal.
cheers,
bruce