D500 or a sparingly used D5 ?

If you would like to post, you'll need to register. Note that if you have a BCG store account, you'll need a new, separate account here (we keep the two sites separate for security purposes).

It depends in large part on how close you can get to your subjects, how large they tend to be, and how much you want to invest in super telephoto lenses. A D500 provides an image size with a 400mm lens that with the D5 would require a 500mm lens to achieve.

The D5 in DX mode becomes a 8.9MP camera with less resolution than the D2x camera. Photographing distant wildlife, as with grizzlies in Yellowstone, or small to medium size birds in most places and one can use the 800mm f/5.6 with the D5 or the 600mm f/4 with the D500 (or D850) and get the same image size. The longer focal length lens also results in more perspective compression and less DOF at any given aperture.

When I tested a D500, D5, and D850 while photographing osprey returning to their nest I found that only in one situation was the D5 clearly superior to the other two cameras in terms of its autofocus performance. That one situation was when the bird was quickly coming directly toward the camera, which is the most difficult situation for any autofocus system. If I was shooting sports events then the D5 would be my choice as there are no "re-do's" in sports. This is not the situation with regard to 99% of wildlife photography.

Photographing from a boat as with trips I made last year to the Pantanal and to Costa Rica, the D850 was the ideal camera along with the 80-400mm and 500mm PF lenses. I was photographing birds and snakes and frogs and lizards at distances often of 150 feet. No way to fill the frame and a D5's 20MP image file would have required cropping and not provided the best picture quality. When I returned from Costa Rica I sold my D500 and bought a second D850.

If the temptation is too great and you buy a D5, then be sure to buy one with the XQD card slots and not one with CF card slots.
 
Agreed and it all makes sense, I found that the D850 could let me use the 300 PF F4 and crop strongly with stunning results as apposed to using a large longer lens, Selling your D500 and buying a second D850 is what I have done as have many of my colleagues, remember with the power pack the d850 dose 9 FPS (claimed) but what many people don't understand is its 14 bit not 12 bit like so many of the newer cameras coming out now...…….My D4s was just fast sharp and accurate Period, never missed a shot, The D5 was the same, With the D5 I could spin like a top and wildly shoot, the D5 would nail it all the time, fantastic, but Gee the image quality and crop ability of the D850 simply made me sell everything for 2 D850 units, I do Rodeo, Surfing, football, wild life and every other subject you can think of, remember $ for 200,000 clicks is not good value, I get the same life out of 2x D850s as I do out of one D5, I found the bargain priced 200-500 amazing and a very tolerable compromise to the expensive and less versatile 500 PF which is a great lens and yes its lighter......but I am built well and weight is not such an issue for me. I find the focusing on the D850 is more than adequate, I mostly get close to my subjects by waiting, one D850 with the 200-500 the other D850 with the 70-200 FL, I usually set up and wait for the subject especially birds, the only thing I don't like about any camera is the shutter noise which often distracts the subject, the only way I would move forward to mirrorless is if the camera supersedes in everyway the D850 at 14 bit........
The Z7 IV is probably the ticket if Nikon is still around........

Only and opinion
 
Back
Top