Chris K
Well-known member
I can’t imagine how or why anyone would want to do a focus shift/stack with any camera without a tripod. To be effective, focus shift requires exactly the same image to be shot at ever so slightly different focal points which, in my mind, requires a rock solid foundation (i.e. a good tripod) to pull off. The resulting images need to be very closely/exactly aligned for the ultimate merged file to be in focus. Not sure about anyone else, but my aging hands aren’t up to the task without some good support.
Why would someone want to do it? Cause carrying a tripod is a chore. If I could handhold all my photos--from astro to macro to the stereotypical waterfall photo--I'd be happy to do so. Heck, I'd be happy if my camera could levitate to handle family portraits!
Technology is slowly reducing the need for tripods, and that's a great thing!
Handheld focus stacking is a new frontier in photography, thanks to IBIS (and stepper motors to a lesser extent). It's a dicey proposition with current technology, but I'm sure computational photography (think iPhone's "night mode") will arrive soon and make this a reasonable way to shoot.
Personally, I've found handheld focus stacking to not work so well for macro. It's challenging to keep framing consistent enough to do focus stacking without throwing out most of the frame.
On the other hand, landscapes tend to work well. With the Z9 I manually rack focus while watching my framing. With my X-T5 I use the nifty auto focus stacking feature (you tell it your near and far focus points and it automatically shoots a stack at 20fps with live view). In any case, I find it pretty easy to keep consistent framing when shooting handheld stacks of far-away things.