Hello, you may remember my previous posts about the need for smaller gear for wildlife. I ended up keeping my Fuji X-H2S and buying the Tamron 150-500 for x-mount.
I feel super happy with the results so far. I think this is one of the best options for a lightweight birding in APS-C format.
But I HAD to have the Nikon Zf! I had sold off my f-mount lenses and cameras last year due to weight and regret it somewhat. It made sense to me to use the Zf for street and general purpose photography and see if maybe in the future, I could pick up a lens that might work for wildlife and birding especially.
I won’t be buying that lens tomorrow. For one, I have a workable kit with the Fuji but the other reason is I make one more major purchase in gear I may end up divorced!!!
So, was wondering if there’s a lens that I might be able to trade for in the used market that could serve for a while just to get a sense of what a Z system could do for me while I let the credit card cool off. Or do I just wait a while and get proper Z glass?
Also, been watching Steve’s videos and it seems Wide-c in combination with 3D is the best autofocus approach, correct?
So, lens thoughts and AF for the Zf… ?
FWIW
If your looking for manual short lenses, for your Zf a consideration based on my experience is, as i have been for years been enjoying genuine Ziess glass, Period.
Voigtländer for me is very nice but its next level down, Leica is adaptable but really Ziess does a fabulous job for far less money and little difference in many cases.
I find with Ziess or Leica glass in a general sense they excel or are designed to perform exceptionally well from F5.6 to F2, once they get to F8 and beyond they pretty much become similar to the very top end Nikon Canon Sony high end primes.
For myself Ziess has a far better and smother precise zooming feel that works so well especially with video, Ziess has greater micro and macro contrast, slightly better colour, and unique clarity offering pop and subject isolation.
European light is different an usually requires a little more contrast, for portraiture here in OZ some people feel Ziess is a little to contrasting, myself i feel is perfectly great.
I find that the light in Tasmania and south Island of NZ just really is magical by comparison to rain forests in far north Queensland.
One huge advantage of Ziess is using infinity, my 100mm F2 macro kills everything when i simply put it on infinity, i can shoot out of a Chopper or light plain with stunning landscape outcomes, i can nail para gliders from cliff tops with stunning colour and detail on my 100 F2 Ziess macro, once the subject is over 15 - 20 meters and everything is brilliantly in focus and tack sharp.
Nikon F2.8 F1.4 F1.8 lenses have truly excelled and one of my all time favorites is simply the 50mm 1.8S, once you use it you often will not want to use much else.
Nikon 50mm 1.8s, Ziess 50mm 1.4 macro, Ziess 100 F2 macro are my tools.
It depends on what your doing and wanting to archive, there is just so much choice out there.
Myself i have the DF Z9 D850, i like the ZF and its on my radar but the Z7III 61mp 10 fps is my overall preference at this stage if it eventuates.
Only an opinion