Roy
Well-known member
Over the years I've collected about a dozen tripods.This is not a brand comparison discussion so please no specific brand recommendations.
What I'm interested in is why so many top shooters say it is imperative to have a huge expensive tripod. I guess I don't like the cost as I can get a pretty decent lens instead for the same $3000 and I don't like the weight since I have to carry it on a trail, and I don't like the size since I have to find a place in the trunk for it and pay to ship it.
Doesn't a $300 tripod get the same result 90% of the time? If its a calm day and the setup is basic? What is needed to get that final 10%?
I guess I'm willing to spend the money if it really is the magic fairy dust that will change my life, but I'd need convincing.
I've ended up with 3 I use regularly.
A heavy one for the studio
A medium on for general use
and a travel tripod for the just in case moments.
I wished I had been more fussy when I started - it would have save a lot of money.
A good tripod lasts a lifetime.
I would expect about $500 would buy you a good reliable tripod. A cheap one is full of frustrations.
Aluminum is fine if the small increase in weight isn't a problem.
All my tripods for the last decades have had arca swiss heads.
For short lenses for landscape a ball head is adequate but I hate them.
A fluid head for landscape and studio and a gimble for BIF...
