Slow or instant success?

If you would like to post, you'll need to register. Note that if you have a BCG store account, you'll need a new, separate account here (we keep the two sites separate for security purposes).

For any subject one has to respect and connect with 'it'. This includes landscapes, to capture the moment. Most successful landscapers put in all the research using maps, local knowledge, Photo ephemeris etc and ideally a pre-shoot recce or more. For example, I have a key location lined up for early next year when the sunrise should align optimally... Too often one has wait for optimal atmospherics, and these hold one at their mercy (in effect).

For wildlife, the best who present excellent images in its genres are passionate. And they too often have been outdoors getting muddy, birding, botanizing etc for years; so they've grown up immersed in a decent understanding of the natural history of the subjects. These facts are well known. But if one cannot operate one's gear, you will lessen successes when the moments happen....

This is the exception for too many drivers of the vehicles in African parks taking game viewers, many of whom take photos. The explosion in wildlife tourism first in E Africa attracted many chancers as drivers, and chasing tips became everything... and this is still a problem. Then the industry expanded rapidly in Zimbabwe and Botswana through the 1990s and also S Africa - with some distinct negatives. Nepotistic recruiting is a persistent challenge in some arenas. All three countries have since tidied up their acts a great deal, but this does not mean all at the wheel of gamedrives have the deep-seated knowledge of natural history. The exceptions are Africans who've grown up in rural areas among large mammals and have hunted and gathered across the landscape since they could walk. Quite a few of the Botswana guides are good, and they are also well mannered...This after all is the culture, still fairly traditional. I say this based on the few guides I've met and lectured to. More and more of these guides are getting into wildlife photography, which deserves all encouragement. This applies notably to the Bayei guides in the Okavango ( experts including in a makoro). They all hold a profound understanding of large mammals, hippos especially. Several of these guys are integral members of a research team I work with in Angola etc; and yes, they also stand fast and think fast in an emergency (as this incident just last week, which could have ended very badly for one of our colleagues in the Okavango!).

I rate the Botswana guides far better than most of the trainees and apprentices at the same level in Zimbabwe ie on Guides and Pro Hunting courses seeking full Pro license (which maintains a high standard and takes no prisoners). Basically, the committed graduates excel at their jobs for good reasons, including professional relations with clients. If you explain your aspirations and plans etc, they know the optimal places quite well, and they are sensitive to feedback. I also hear from the guide trainers in Zambia, who I've helped out with curricula etc) that their guiding standards have improved a lot over the past few years as better qualifications are now required in the hospitality industry.
 
Last edited:
That of course would be totaly different if the group were paying individuals that did n't know each other. In my experience has a guide in a group there will always be different needs and wants and opinions that's why there's a guide some you don't spend the entire day wondering around trying to please everyone.
All I can say is my experience with photo tours is 100% the opposite of what you describe!! And yes, we started out as all strangers and with different levels of experience!

What Steve said
Honestly, it's not that hard to just take over and get the guides to do what you want.
 
Really? I can understand this behavior if it's your workshop and the rest of the group are there as your guest. But if you are just another punter in a mixed group that's just not on. If you had attended one of my motorcycle tours and tried this I would have simply given you your money back and put you on a plane home. You can't have the trail wagging the dog. The guide is there for a reason to give ALL the paying customers the best and safest experience they can have. If on the other hand you had hired me for a one on one tour then I would let you have some say in what the itinerary would be. But there would still only be one person making the decisions. You can see now why I would rather go my own way, if I turned up on the same photographic tour as you (and did n't know you were a very good pro) and you started dictating where the group were going I would be throwing a track. Now if i'd paid to attend one of your tours/workshops then I would expect you to be calling the shots. If someone else started dictating where and what we were doing I would support you in telling them to whined their necks in.

It's not quite like that. I suppose saying I "take over" isn't painting an accurate picture. I do make my voice heard when I don't like what's happening and we're in the wrong position though. In many cases, the guides are NOT photographers so they don't know exactly what works best in every scenario. When they get it right, I keep my mouth shut, but when they are clearly in a poor location, I speak up. Some guides are better than others and have a real knack of putting you right in the action, others are not. I don't think it's out of line when there's an obviously better location to speak up and ask to move. And, as a side, note, I've had the others in the group thank me later for the move. Often, I'll mention a potential move the others in the group like, "You know, I think we'd be better over there - think we should move?" It's almost always yes, they were just hesitant to speak up. The problem is, on these trips often people are too shy or insecure to speak up when the guide is in the wrong location. Why should we all sit there in the wrong spot?

At any rate, the bottom line here is that getting guides to do what you want isn't that big of a deal, regardless of your status as a pro.
 
It's not quite like that. I suppose saying I "take over" isn't painting an accurate picture. I do make my voice heard when I don't like what's happening and we're in the wrong position though. In many cases, the guides are NOT photographers so they don't know exactly what works best in every scenario. When they get it right, I keep my mouth shut, but when they are clearly in a poor location, I speak up. Some guides are better than others and have a real knack of putting you right in the action, others are not. I don't think it's out of line when there's an obviously better location to speak up and ask to move. And, as a side, note, I've had the others in the group thank me later for the move. Often, I'll mention a potential move the others in the group like, "You know, I think we'd be better over there - think we should move?" It's almost always yes, they were just hesitant to speak up. The problem is, on these trips often people are too shy or insecure to speak up when the guide is in the wrong location. Why should we all sit there in the wrong spot?

At any rate, the bottom line here is that getting guides to do what you want isn't that big of a deal, regardless of your status as a pro.
Ah, I think I am talking and understood you were talking, about a photographic tour guide not a driver. If he or she were a guide on a photographic trip I would expect them to know the best spots that's what your paying for. If I ran my tours and wondered are aimlessly I would expect someone to speak up. Asking others in the group is if they also want to move is mutiny! I was doing a Sea expedition leaders course in Scotland and the Guide instructor was useless, so I paddle off into the sunset and left. I did n't undermined his authority.
 
Ah, I think I am talking and understood you were talking, about a photographic tour guide not a driver. If he or she were a guide on a photographic trip I would expect them to know the best spots that's what your paying for. If I ran my tours and wondered are aimlessly I would expect someone to speak up. Asking others in the group is if they also want to move is mutiny! I was doing a Sea expedition leaders course in Scotland and the Guide instructor was useless, so I paddle off into the sunset and left. I did n't undermined his authority.
No, usually the photo tour guides know their stuff and it's usually better to let them do their thing since they have a LOT more experience in the area than I ever will. I'm talking about a general guide who gets you to the animals but is not a photographer. However, there are a few of those that, although they don't shoot, they know just where to put the truck / boat. Then of course, there are those that don't LOL!!!
 
Steve's distinction on types of guides is important. I've found most photography guides know the area quite well and their suggestions come from years of experience. Wildlife guides or tour guides are different. I've had guides that took me to places that were ideal for birders but not photographers. I've had guides that were really tour guides focused on interesting stories rather than putting me in the right locations. And I've had guides that had minimal sense of time including one that missed the prime sunset location by spending time at insignificant stops along the way. You have to talk with your guide and develop an understanding about their experience and their strengths.

Back to the original question, one of the main skills for a nature photographer is learning to see. When I visit a location, it's probably a failure if I walk away with just a single hero image. That's the image everyone else has, and it's fine to get my version. But I want to walk away with 4-5 other good photos. I might want to tell a story about a trip or a location - maybe how I spent my morning. I want to vary size, scale, and orientation. I want to capture details, different angles, and the less common subjects. I'll often start with a wide lens, then break out a 70-200 to work on extracting small portions of a landscape. With wildlife it's similar - head shots always look somewhat the same, but the animal in context of the environment provides a sense of place.

I don't enjoy being in a place with 10-200 other photographers standing around for the same shot. Last time I was at Mesa Arch, there were more than 50 photographers crammed into a tiny area. I made a half mile hike along the canyon rim and had the area completely to myself. The others all had versions of 1-2 standard photos of the arch - and all of my photos were different. I've done the same thing at Yosemite. Rather than joining 125 other photographers for a mediocre sunrise at Tunnel View, I'll spend the early morning along the Merced river in the valley and get some of my favorite images.
 
Back
Top