Starting new PC build

If you would like to post, you'll need to register. Note that if you have a BCG store account, you'll need a new, separate account here (we keep the two sites separate for security purposes).

Ha! December must have been the PC building month. I started my build end of Dec as well! :LOL:

This is my build, _mostly_ done:

IMG_4410.jpeg
You can only see EXIF info for this image if you are logged in.


IMG_4411.jpeg
You can only see EXIF info for this image if you are logged in.


IMG_4412.jpeg
You can only see EXIF info for this image if you are logged in.
 
Last edited:
This is a good topic. I also have been considering a PC build, haven't done one in over 10 years. Wondering if you all are doing exclusively INTEL builds, no AMD Ryzen or other brand/type of CPU? Is this personal choice, default choice, or is there a performance reason related to photography post-processing? Ah I see DurhamWolf posted something similar while I was typing.
Theoretically, both AMD and Intel have processors that are competitive in terms of performance for image workflows. However Intel is kinda in the dog-house at the moment wrt reliability issues, so I think AMD is a better choice at the moment.
 
Been PC for years and now thinking that the graphics card industry is lagging behind especially with their PCIe generations. Maybe still OK for gaming but not good for content and video creators. It seems we are forced to pay too much for a card when moving to the next PCIe gen would double the interface speeds at a fraction of the cost. I'd like to stay with PC, as its what I know, but are we being ripped off?
video cards simply haven't _used_ the bandwidth and current pci4 based cards tend not to tax pcie4 busses. i'm guessing that will continue. with pci5 based cards. so, i don't think the fact they haven't had pci4 based support is a big issue.

and of course, programs like lightroom don't take full advantage of gpus or cpus as it stands, so there tends not to be an incentive to get the fastest gpu card for photo workflows anyways

cost, well that's a whole different thing. everything is expensive these days.
 
I'd like to stay with PC, as its what I know, but are we being ripped off?
i just built a pretty nuts expensive system, but i priced out apple too, and tbh, it's just as expensive when you compare apples to apples, AND you end up being stuck talking to almost all your storage through thunderbolt which can be ok if it meets your needs, but it certainly isn't optimal in a lot of ways.
 
Ha! December must have been the PC building month. I started my build end of Dec as well! :LOL:

This is my build, _mostly_ done:

Really nice build. Well done.
 
I am ready to load my video card drivers and found I now have two choices; Nvidia Game Ready or Creator Ready. This must be a very new development but Creator Ready sounds like a nice option for photo and video editors, especially those using Adobe.

 
I am ready to load my video card drivers and found I now have two choices; Nvidia Game Ready or Creator Ready. This must be a very new development but Creator Ready sounds like a nice option for photo and video editors, especially those using Adobe.

i think "creator ready" is basically their "stable" version.
 
I am ready to load my video card drivers and found I now have two choices; Nvidia Game Ready or Creator Ready. This must be a very new development but Creator Ready sounds like a nice option for photo and video editors, especially those using Adobe.

I have been using Studio Ready on my older Dell desktop for maybe the last year or so. I continued using studio ready on my new (3 1/2 weeks old desktop).
 
I am very interested in this topic as I need to replace my old win 10 desktop I had custom built for me at MicroCenter. I will likely have MicroCenter build me a new one with win 11 pro.

I am thinking to switching from Intel to a AMD Ryzen 7 9700X 8 core CPU or a AMD Ryzen 9 9900Z 8 core CPU.
Motherboard? Likely ATX size with lots of ports. Recommendations appreciated.
Case? Mid Tower desktop
One SSD for the software--1 TB
Second SSD for the images to be processed? 1 TB. I really do not understand how best to use a second SSD or if one is really needed.
HDD for internal image storage--24 TB or 20 TB
GPU will be needed. GeForce RTX 4060 8 GB RAM?
Lots of quiet fans for cooling.
Image editing. Right now no video editing.

Software used is DXO PL 8 elite edition, NIK Collection, Nikon NX Studio; Adobe Photography suite will be loaded, but used infrequently.
On the choice of HDD, I only keep one mechnical disk inside, all others are M.2 or SSD drives for the heat managment.

Also, I would consider getting water cooling rigs with a full sized case, my mid tower set up gets hot during the video encoding process.

Oliver
 
I culled a folder of images I took today down to 84, still too many and I could /should have deleted more, but wanted to see how the new PC would handle running the NEF files through DxO PureRaw. With both my previous PC and MacBook Pro M2 MAX this could take well over an hour, even hours at times. I didn't time it as I was so used to the long wait I opened a browser and before I knew it, the batch was done. I am ecstatic with the speed. I'll add, copying the folder to my PC via the Thunderbolt/USB C port on the back of the PC was also blazingly fast. I am a happy camper.
 
I am ready to load my video card drivers and found I now have two choices; Nvidia Game Ready or Creator Ready. This must be a very new development but Creator Ready sounds like a nice option for photo and video editors, especially those using Adobe.

When I built my current system back in 2023 using an Nvidia GPU there was a choice of either Gamer or Creator driver. The drivers get updated fairly often so watch for them - and be sure the correct driver is installed. I initially installed the creator driver but somewhere along the line in an update it was switched to the Gamer until I noticed it not long ago and switched it back.

Also, I would consider getting water cooling rigs with a full sized case, my mid tower set up gets hot during the video encoding process.

When I was spec'ing my build I agonized over either air or water cooling the CPU ( i7 12700) in my new mini-tower which has a perforated mesh case + case fans for good airflow. In the end I decided I wanted no chance of possible water leakage so installed a Noctua single-tower air cooler with 1 fan. Cool, quiet and efficient. When rendering a dozen or more 4K video clips the Core Temp utility showed the CPU temp was hardly breaking a sweat. YMMV.

When encoding video I believe that the GPU does the heavy lifting and most heat generation. Water cooling AFAIK is only available for the CPU.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top