Thanks for all the replies, everyone!
If you would like to post, you'll need to register. Note that if you have a BCG store account, you'll need a new, separate account here (we keep the two sites separate for security purposes).
Hi all, I use both software and they are doing an excellent job. Here is my work flow:I recently acquired and started using Sharpen AI and Denoise AI and they have changed the way I post process. I feel they surpass any other method I have for sharpening or noise reduction. I now use them for almost every image. Usually I first do all my other processing in Lightroom and if necessary Photoshop. Then I select one of these programs as a final step. Incredibly, Sharpen beautifully eliminates noise while so effectively sharpening. And Denoise nicely sharpens images while removing noise. For other than a very noisy image, I usually pick Sharpen over Denoise. But you can try both to see which gives the better image. Finally, I feel that I can effectively remove noise without compromising sharpness. Even with a very fast processor, it can take some time for the operation to complete. But it is worth the wait.
If you are talking about Topaz Denoise Ai ...... that and Photoshop tools have a completely different set of abilities......both are now vital to my denoise workflow when combined via layers. Sharpening again can be a very creative process if used skillfully..........I want natural looking images with little or no visible noise, which i can now achieve....(all images need a little noise so that they don't suffer from color banding issues or look fake)...... My advise is get denoise Ai and combine that via layers with other photoshop denoise/sharpening tools.......I use predominantly Denoise ai and camera raw tools for noise.A question for the esteemed and knowledgeable members of this forum: I am an experienced Photoshop user, well versed in the noise reduction and sharpening tools available within it, which I've found to be reasonably effective. I am, however, intrigued by the many kudos for DeNoise. I'm wondering if DeNoise produces superior results to Photoshop's capabilities, or if investing in DeNoise would merely duplicate software capability I already have? All thoughts on the matter would be much appreciated.
I'm no expert. In my opinion, the first step is to follow Steve's workflow on reducing noise in LR/PS (He has a workflow you can purchase for about $15). After that, if needed Denoise works.A question for the esteemed and knowledgeable members of this forum: I am an experienced Photoshop user, well versed in the noise reduction and sharpening tools available within it, which I've found to be reasonably effective. I am, however, intrigued by the many kudos for DeNoise. I'm wondering if DeNoise produces superior results to Photoshop's capabilities, or if investing in DeNoise would merely duplicate software capability I already have? All thoughts on the matter would be much appreciated.
I have both Programs and I find DeNoise AI with the latest upgrade to work very well.
If you want to have some fun ... run a photo through Gigapixel AI (program adds pixels to the file) THEN run it through Sharpen AI .I also like Gigapixel AI, sometimes it sharpens better than Sharpen AI. I've just seen a recent youtube video that shows "at least with some photos" using Sharpen AI twice (second time on output from first pass), can help with some really bad photos.
Eric Lowery (Topaz) Aug 31, 2020, 2:39 PM CDT James, Hi James. Thanks for reaching out. This is a known phenomenon that we will be taking a look at in the future. If you adjust the noise reduction slider up or down it should correct this artifact. It's a conflict in the AI model itself so I don't have an immediate solution for the images it happens to other than slightly changing the noise reduction settings. Sincerely, Eric Lowery Operations Manager M-F: 9:00am-5:30pm CST Become A Topaz Labs Beta Tester: community.topazlabs.com/g/Photo-Beta-Testers/ |