I hope this is not a "stupid question", but:
Using my Z6 II, and I am going to take an image of a small bird at and a fairly long distance away.... which is not a "frame filler" at FX.
Would it be any benefit to switching to DX mode vs. a heavy crop on the FX?
When I took a test shot the target was significantly larger on the DX shot (I believe it is 1.5x larger). At the monitor level, I did not perceive any difference in quality.
This could be a "big" deal with shooting macro shots.
After reading this, it seems to be the correct choice: https://photographylife.com/nikon-dx-vs-fx
What am I missing???
Using my Z6 II, and I am going to take an image of a small bird at and a fairly long distance away.... which is not a "frame filler" at FX.
Would it be any benefit to switching to DX mode vs. a heavy crop on the FX?
When I took a test shot the target was significantly larger on the DX shot (I believe it is 1.5x larger). At the monitor level, I did not perceive any difference in quality.
This could be a "big" deal with shooting macro shots.
After reading this, it seems to be the correct choice: https://photographylife.com/nikon-dx-vs-fx
What am I missing???