OK, I'm changing this thread to an official discussion for the a9iii and the 300 2.8. Both look very interesting to me - what is your take?
Last edited:
If you would like to post, you'll need to register. Note that if you have a BCG store account, you'll need a new, separate account here (we keep the two sites separate for security purposes).
Rose and I were thinking the same thing about the a1ii. I wonder if we'll see a 51MP global shutterJust watched the Sony announcement of the new Sony A9 mark 3, along with the New GM 300mm f2.8 and the software update on the current A1, all due Spring 2024, and I have to say that the A9iii looks to be a real gamechanger-- Global Shutter reading all pixels simultaneously and with a frame rate of 120 per sec at 14 bit RAW possible, is an amazing leap forward in camera technology and must be a real advantage to wildlife and sports shooters. The new lens looks good too, very light as well, but probably of more interest to the sports photographers in this group.
The A1 update is long overdue, but I rather think the A1 mark 2 will incorporate most of the new technology being presented in this A9iii so better start saving now if you feel like getting the latest in a new flagship camera.
That's whatI was thinking as well, although historically TCs often cause a bit more AF inconsistency than native focal lengths. Still, the size and weight are really impressive and I can see myself getting one.If the price and weight I heard for the 300mm f2.8 are right then wowza... 300mm f2.8 at 1.5kg and 6k $ that can be a 420mm f4 or a 600mm f5.6 with the TCs is nothing short of spectacular and if it holds up optically, might swing people from Nikon's 400mm f4.5 and 600mm f6.3...
let's all normalize that 24MP is OK! :-DI know it's only 24 MP, but global shutter,
i can't help but think that getting this technology from 24MP -> 51MP is hard. i'm sure it's coming, but i am pretty guarded it would be coming sooner than first half of next yearRose and I were thinking the same thing about the a1ii. I wonder if we'll see a 51MP global shutter
I've always thought it was I used the D4, D5, and D6 for a long time without any issues. 24MP works for me, just gotta fill the frame.let's all normalize that 24MP is OK! :-D
not trying to make this about nikon, but i'm pretty sure the inclusion of content authenticity in the a1 by march will mean we'll see that in the z9 by march as well. nikon was one of the first that committed to itIn part, this release is probably timed for the Paris Olympics next year. CaNikon could also have their respective announcements pending. Hopefully, the precapture RAW ignites the squib under Nikon for an overdue firmware fix (!?)
The difference is range. With the current high speed sync, the flat basically pops off throughout the exposure to compensate for the sensor scan. It works, but it limits the range. If you want the full range of the flash, you have to stick with the standard sync speed or lower.i'm curious what this means for flash users? i've heard GS is supposedly the holy grail for flash since you can basically do anything and it should work, but i'm curious about this from a practical perspective. i've only started to play with flash, but i went up to 1/4000s with hss on the z9 without any issues, so i'm curious what GS can do that other cameras cannot?
I'm no expert on this but I think you have been lucky. This past weekend actually on the Z8 I was experimenting and was getting noticeable banding with HSS at about 1/400 and higher. I was trying to use 1/800 or 1/1000 but the banding was too significant. This prompted me to do an internet search because I'd wondered if with the high readout speed of the Z9 it shouldn't be a problem but it seems that there are a lot of people out there discussing their disappointment with the banding they get on the Z9 with hss.i'm curious what this means for flash users? i've heard GS is supposedly the holy grail for flash since you can basically do anything and it should work, but i'm curious about this from a practical perspective. i've only started to play with flash, but i went up to 1/4000s with hss on the z9 without any issues, so i'm curious what GS can do that other cameras cannot?
interesting. i'll try not to take this thread off course, but will point to my flash experiment threadI'm no expert on this but I think you have been lucky. This past weekend actually on the Z8 I was experimenting and was getting noticeable banding with HSS at about 1/400 and higher. I was trying to use 1/800 or 1/1000 but the banding was too significant. This prompted me to do an internet search because I'd wondered if with the high readout speed of the Z9 it shouldn't be a problem but it seems that there are a lot of people out there discussing their disappointment with the banding they get on the Z9 with hss.
The only possible caveat is that I have seen some people report that it only occurs with an on camera flash and not with a flash placed elsewhere, but I haven't been able to verify if this is generally true.
I will say that I noticed the banding most on lighter backgrounds, but I didn't look too closely so it may be there on darker ones, too.
Yes, as you say I guess it boils down to how much more functionality can be squeezed out of the existing hardware: Z9 and Z8not trying to make this about nikon, but i'm pretty sure the inclusion of content authenticity in the a1 by march will mean we'll see that in the z9 by march as well. nikon was one of the first that committed to it
less clear about pre-capture raw because we really don't know if the z9 has the horsepower to process it