14mm prime

If you would like to post, you'll need to register. Note that if you have a BCG store account, you'll need a new, separate account here (we keep the two sites separate for security purposes).

Yeah both the Laowa 15mm f4 macro and the 15mm f2 zero distortion. I have on occasion gotten VERY close lol.
😁 I have the 15 f4 and it's a fun lens. I too have probably taken some unecessary risks with snakes, but I'm trying to be better. It's just not worth risking a bite for a photo, even one I really want. So I've been messing around with plexiglass shields, tripods, etc. But I think using the remote to autofocus with subject detection to get the eye has a lot of promise.
 
Makes one think of opportunities. Just thinking aloud, I think that the depth of field is going to be all about the magnification which comes from the interaction between the distance and the focal length, so DOF should be the same whether a wide angle lens up up close or a short telephoto a little father away, as long as the subject is the same size in the frame. The thing that will vary will be the perspective that comes from the subject distance and of course the field of view. So mostly I guess it's about keeping the perspective you get by being close along with the field of view of the wide angle. Nothing you didn't already know.
It's also nice how much depth of field the wide angle lenses have. You can shoot landscape at f/5.6 at times and still get most things in focus
 
😁 I have the 15 f4 and it's a fun lens. I too have probably taken some unecessary risks with snakes, but I'm trying to be better. It's just not worth risking a bite for a photo, even one I really want. So I've been messing around with plexiglass shields, tripods, etc. But I think using the remote to autofocus with subject detection to get the eye has a lot of promise.
I have a decently large lexan shield I can attach to my camera. Never had a strike. Also clever use of a hide box simplifies things greatly.
 
Wes…you’re a much braver person than I am to get close enough to a rattlesnake to fill the frame with a rattlesnake at 15 mm…but wonderful shots.
Im actually more worried about stepping on them than I am getting bit while shooting them. Its hard to explain and I dont want to outright put it out on the web for some dummy to try and get bit, but the method I use is about as safe as it can get without remotes. The degree of safety varies from snake to snake of course, a snake with a bad attitude gets the 60mm and the chill ones get the 15mm.
 
Im actually more worried about stepping on them than I am getting bit while shooting them. Its hard to explain and I dont want to outright put it out on the web for some dummy to try and get bit, but the method I use is about as safe as it can get without remotes. The degree of safety varies from snake to snake of course, a snake with a bad attitude gets the 60mm and the chill ones get the 15mm.
Most of the time if you don't make sudden erratic moves, they won't strike. I have been 10-12 inches from copperheads laying on the ground with zero issues.
 
100%, and covering them for a few minutes usually settles them down pretty well and if you move deliberately they just watch you as you do your thing. But having a hand in front of the lens to twist a manual focus ring makes me a little nervous, and it only takes one time to go wrong and be a bad scene. Plenty of other fun creatures to photograph with wide glass as well.

DS1_4092.jpg
You can only see EXIF info for this image if you are logged in.
 
Last edited:
Im actually more worried about stepping on them than I am getting bit while shooting them. Its hard to explain and I dont want to outright put it out on the web for some dummy to try and get bit, but the method I use is about as safe as it can get without remotes. The degree of safety varies from snake to snake of course, a snake with a bad attitude gets the 60mm and the chill ones get the 15mm.
I’m surprised you guys have rattlesnakes that large in PA. I sure would hate to get bit by one of those. I’ve read it’s a $80k anti venom treatment, excruciating pain and a lot of folks don’t make it. I think 4-6 feet would be my max with a rattlesnake. Copperheads are venomous but far less lethal.
 
Most of the time if you don't make sudden erratic moves, they won't strike. I have been 10-12 inches from copperheads laying on the ground with zero issues.
Ok…but as the guy that got attempted strikes…thank goodness for snake proof pants…about a hundred times cruising timber in AL and MS during a summer in college…that’s way too darned close. Unfortunately…cruising timber requires walking a compass line so no trails to be used and you run across a lot of rattlers, copperheads, and cottonmouths that way.
 
Ok…but as the guy that got attempted strikes…thank goodness for snake proof pants…about a hundred times cruising timber in AL and MS during a summer in college…that’s way too darned close. Unfortunately…cruising timber requires walking a compass line so no trails to be used and you run across a lot of rattlers, copperheads, and cottonmouths that way.
I wear redwing snake boots during the summer here in MO because there are lots of copperheads and rattlers. I don’t take any chances and have been struck in the ankle by a large copperhead but luckily had my boots on.
 
I wear redwing snake boots during the summer here in MO because there are lots of copperheads and rattlers. I don’t take any chances and have been struck in the ankle by a large copperhead but luckily had my boots on.
We had those too, and gloves lthough they were more for thorns and brambles than snakes…but still got struck many times. The most amazing thing was how hard they hit you…it won’t knock you over but it’s a lot harder than a tap…but then you probably have 3 pounds of snake going 25 mph or so. We saw mostly rattlers and cottonmouths depending on if it was a swamp or forest we were cruising. What we wore were essentially leather chaps like a cowboy has over our jeans…and man did they get hot in the summer in LA…lower Alabama.
 
We had those too, and gloves lthough they were more for thorns and brambles than snakes…but still got struck many times. The most amazing thing was how hard they hit you…it won’t knock you over but it’s a lot harder than a tap…but then you probably have 3 pounds of snake going 25 mph or so. We saw mostly rattlers and cottonmouths depending on if it was a swamp or forest we were cruising. What we wore were essentially leather chaps like a cowboy has over our jeans…and man did they get hot in the summer in LA…lower Alabama.
Yeah it’s pretty amazing the power they produce during a strike. Cottonmouths are one I will not mess with in any regard.
 
How are you guys filling the frame with small animals in a wide angle lens? My Nikon 14-30 has a minimum focus distance of 11 inches. Even a foot away, at 14 mm a frog or salamander would be a tiny spec in the frame. Is there an ultra wide angle out there that has macro type focus distance?
 
Yeah it’s pretty amazing the power they produce during a strike. Cottonmouths are one I will not mess with in any regard.
Pygmy rattlers are worse…they’re small and keep trying to strike over and over. Must be trying to make up for being small. Cottonmouths second worst…they’re bigger timber rattlers mostly slithered away more likely.
 
How are you guys filling the frame with small animals in a wide angle lens? My Nikon 14-30 has a minimum focus distance of 11 inches. Even a foot away, at 14 mm a frog or salamander would be a tiny spec in the frame. Is there an ultra wide angle out there that has macro type focus distance?
The picture of the red legged frog above was taken with the 14-30, but is cropped from full frame 8200ish pixels down to about 6700. The frog was about 3 inches long. You do have to be careful that parts of the subject you want in focus aren't closer than MFD. There are a couple of 15mm 1:1 true macro lenses: Laowa 15mm F4, Opteka 15mm F4 which work much better for small creatures, but are fully manual.
 
How are you guys filling the frame with small animals in a wide angle lens? My Nikon 14-30 has a minimum focus distance of 11 inches. Even a foot away, at 14 mm a frog or salamander would be a tiny spec in the frame. Is there an ultra wide angle out there that has macro type focus distance?

According to a calculator at 11 inches on a full frame camera a 14mm lens will have a field of view about 19 by 28 inches. So yeah a frog would be tiny.
 
The picture of the red legged frog above was taken with the 14-30, but is cropped from full frame 8200ish pixels down to about 6700. The frog was about 3 inches long. You do have to be careful that parts of the subject you want in focus aren't closer than MFD. There are a couple of 15mm 1:1 true macro lenses: Laowa 15mm F4, Opteka 15mm F4 which work much better for small creatures, but are fully manual.
That Laowa lens looks like it would be fun. Maybe if one ever comes out in Z mount I'll grab one.
 
How are you guys filling the frame with small animals in a wide angle lens? My Nikon 14-30 has a minimum focus distance of 11 inches. Even a foot away, at 14 mm a frog or salamander would be a tiny spec in the frame. Is there an ultra wide angle out there that has macro type focus distance?
The laowa wide angles have incredibly close minimum focus distance. They make a 15mm macro. You can essentially focus on something touching the lens.
 
The laowa wide angles have incredibly close minimum focus distance. They make a 15mm macro. You can essentially focus on something touching the lens.
I have contemplated buying the 90mm version which is 2x but the lack of weather sealing sorta concerns me. Perhaps it wouldn’t be an issue.
 
For those of you that have a 14mm prime lens, what are most of your use case scenarios for this lens? I’ve had one a couple years and really don’t use it a lot. I have used it on Milky Way shots a few times. I have also tried doing some architectural photography with it. Sometimes I will do foreground elements with it. I still seem to prefer something in the 20 mm range most of the time for full frame. I am contemplating selling it but it is a great lens. Since buying a crop sensor travel body, I have used it with that body and the 21mm fov is nice. Just curious what others use this lens for.
I use the 14-24 F2.8 G, and the 16mm F2.8 D Fish Eye.

I initially considered the 14mm prime but wanted the range from 14-24 to complete the reach to the 24-70 then the 70-200, then the 200-500.

The 14-24 at 14mm i use for landscapes, sea scapes, street photography, paparazzi events, festivals, any wide angle close contact tight coverage.

It focus down to 6 inches and is very sharp.

I shoot it on a tripod with filters, or handled from the waist or even from my ankles at ground level, weddings, sports action, nature. Documentary record shots.

Its a very versatile capable tool if you know how to use it to its potential.

Its a fast sharp accurate, and a creative great tool.

Very happy with all of them, be they on a D850 D6 Z8 Z9.

Handy on a DX sensor but a waste actually, if anything if its not used in 12 months its sold or given away.

Less is more.

Only an opinion
 
Last edited:
Back
Top