Anyone still using "lossless compression" image quality with Z9?

If you would like to post, you'll need to register. Note that if you have a BCG store account, you'll need a new, separate account here (we keep the two sites separate for security purposes).

I was resistant to switching to HE* but once I did, I never went back. I can abuse the RAW files in Lightroom to the extent that I’m worried about running afoul of the Geneva Convention, yet they seem as pliable as lossless compressed files.
I am primarily a landscape photographer and I was reluctant to switch to HE*. I finally tried it and despite absurd degrees of pixel-peeping I can find no difference between HE* and lossless compression, even in the deep shadows of underexposed photos, plus the HE* files are way smaller. I'll never switch back.
 
I am primarily a landscape photographer and I was reluctant to switch to HE*. I finally tried it and despite absurd degrees of pixel-peeping I can find no difference between HE* and lossless compression, even in the deep shadows of underexposed photos, plus the HE* files are way smaller. I'll never switch back.
I'm still struggling to find a difference between regular HE and lossless compressed. Both are pretty amazing compression files.

I wish Nikon would at least implement pre-capture RAW in HE, I think that's entirely possible with its file sizes being about the same as JPEG fine.

My project for today is to go out and shoot some birds with ONLY jpeg using some recipes and see how the results look. I'm trying to dial in the most optimal Pre-Capture Jpeg profile I can put together.
 
I have issues with previewing HE files in MacOS. As a result, I also cannot open them in Affinity Photo or DXO PhotoLab, which are my editing options. If I shoot HE, I have to convert them in Nikon’s software first, which is needlessly laborious.
 
I have issues with previewing HE files in MacOS. As a result, I also cannot open them in Affinity Photo or DXO PhotoLab, which are my editing options. If I shoot HE, I have to convert them in Nikon’s software first, which is needlessly laborious.
You need to update dxo. They've recognized the files for a while now. I'm unsure about affinity, and apple is slow to update as well.
 
I have issues with previewing HE files in MacOS. As a result, I also cannot open them in Affinity Photo or DXO PhotoLab, which are my editing options. If I shoot HE, I have to convert them in Nikon’s software first, which is needlessly laborious.
I can't preview on my Mac but DXO works fine with HE/HE*. I'm using DXO Photolab 8.

Unless I need ai denoise my workflow is crazy sometimes as I go into NX to get Nikon colors, then TIFF to DXO to get clear view/lens corrections and then to Lightroom for the AI subject "pop" or other features. I wish one of them could do it all well but they don't.
 
All points taken re file size, quality etc but I shall stay for the foreseeable future with Lossless Compressed. The reason being I have a workflow that I am practised at — Mac OS computer, Photo Mechanic, ACR, PS if needed. I hate sitting down; would rather keep moving to take photos or just be out and about, so to minimize computer time am happy to need higher shooting storage (and often consider not keeping all the Raws after the event depending on success rating, look of JPEG conversions etc). But will keep an open mind once all the workflow issues sort themselves out, while reluctant to spend time learning or comparing new software.
 
Does Affinity Photo read Z8 HE* files as well as the Z9 ones? I haven't yet upgraded so would be keen to know as I cant seem to find the RAW support document on the website. Thank you (MAC User)
Also a Mac user. Affinity 2 does not support HE* but if you buy it you can download the 2.6 Beta which does free. I have had no problems with the Beta, it's all I use now. You can run both Affinity 2 and the Affinity 2.6 Beta side by side.
 
What happens when you convert HE* to DNG in LR? I believe when I tried that several months ago, the DNG files were just as big as the lossless compression files - hence the HE* file size advanmtage was reversed when converting to DNG. Anyone experience this? Thx.
 
What happens when you convert HE* to DNG in LR? I believe when I tried that several months ago, the DNG files were just as big as the lossless compression files - hence the HE* file size advanmtage was reversed when converting to DNG. Anyone experience this? Thx.
Yes, that's exactly what happens. If not get even bigger.

The HE formats are proprietary compression, and DNG is either not compressed or not very compressed. Either way.
 
I got my Z9 few days back and reading all the nice articles and videos around "High Efficiency Star" being practically equivalent to "Lossless Compression" quality. With many softwares now supporting the HE format, i'm wondering if anyone still using the "lossless compression" option and if so, whats the reason?
I shoot in the most aggressive HE mode I can on all my Z's. There's no practical difference in file quality, but the file size advantages are huge. Big reason I bought a Z6III is so I could enjoy wirelessly tethering 11MB 24MP NEF's into Capture One on the architectural jobs that I shoot. Total workflow game changer. I can do at least 50% more work in the same amount of time because I don't have to worry about the safety or infrastructure of a tether cable.
 
I shoot in the most aggressive HE mode I can on all my Z's. There's no practical difference in file quality, but the file size advantages are huge. Big reason I bought a Z6III is so I could enjoy wirelessly tethering 11MB 24MP NEF's into Capture One on the architectural jobs that I shoot. Total workflow game changer. I can do at least 50% more work in the same amount of time because I don't have to worry about the safety or infrastructure of a tether cable.
I'm not tethered but I use HE for the same reason, wireless transfer to my MacBook. I don't even pull cards out of the camera anymore. I cannot see any loss in the regular HE files. Maybe it's there but you would probably have to really torture a file to see it.
 
Interesting. Any idea what happens in Pure Raw 4?
PR4 can ingest HE files, but it spits out whatever normal format (dng, tiff, etc), it can't spit out HE files (which makes sense, once you've modified them it can't be the same as it was). The difference is with PR you're only editing the few files you want to work on, vs having to remake all of them into dng to even look at them. At least I don't, since I use a version of C1 that also sees HE files and can read them just fine.
 
All points taken re file size, quality etc but I shall stay for the foreseeable future with Lossless Compressed. The reason being I have a workflow that I am practised at — Mac OS computer, Photo Mechanic, ACR, PS if needed. I hate sitting down; would rather keep moving to take photos or just be out and about, so to minimize computer time am happy to need higher shooting storage (and often consider not keeping all the Raws after the event depending on success rating, look of JPEG conversions etc). But will keep an open mind once all the workflow issues sort themselves out, while reluctant to spend time learning or comparing new software.
I don't understand. How would using HE* files versus lossless raw change your workflow? Whether you start with a lossless raw of HE* I believe the workflow is the same.....except that moving files from card to computer might be faster?
 
Back
Top