Are protective front filters necessary?

If you would like to post, you'll need to register. Note that if you have a BCG store account, you'll need a new, separate account here (we keep the two sites separate for security purposes).

I certainly respect your opinion.. I'm referring to cleaning the front surface, lens hood notwithstanding...

I would love to see some definitive tests showing a degradation of a high end clear or UV filter. I would reconsider my stance if I saw that kind of proof...just sayin'...
To be honest I go out 5-6 days a week in dusty conditions in all kinds of weather and typically only clean my front elements a few times a year and use a rocket blower between cleanings. It’s really just a matter of choice but with at least with a few lenses I’ve tried them on, they are just not worth it.
 
I certainly respect your opinion.. I'm referring to cleaning the front surface, lens hood notwithstanding...

I would love to see some definitive tests showing a degradation of a high end clear or UV filter. I would reconsider my stance if I saw that kind of proof...just sayin'...
Steve doesn't recommend the use of UV filters, but notes that in his testing, any loss of sharpness and clarity in minimal. He also notes that there can be unwanted flare and ghosting under certain lighting conditions.

 
I think the hood provides more protection than a filter. But I do use a neutral filter so the actual front element never requires cleaning. Poor cleaning techniques and obsessive cleaning is a slow destroyer of an optical surface. I've carefully done comparison photos with and without a front filter and am unable to see and reduction in image quality using a filter.
 
Back
Top