Shutter 200, f 16
It's not causing your issue, but as an aside f16 is getting into where diffraction is going to cause some softening on that camera.
If you would like to post, you'll need to register. Note that if you have a BCG store account, you'll need a new, separate account here (we keep the two sites separate for security purposes).
Shutter 200, f 16
thank youIt's not causing your issue, but as an aside f16 is getting into where diffraction is going to cause some softening on that camera.
Why is shutter so low? No reason to be that low.Shutter 200, f 16
Good question I will check my pics and get back to youWhy is shutter so low? No reason to be that low.
Thank you I can understand what you say.Use exposure compensation. When the background is brighter you most often would brighten (positive exposure compensation). When the background is darker, you would usually darken (negative exposure compensation.) If you have blinkies/overexposure warning you can take some test shots to find what level of compensation gets you the brightest image without the blinkies flashing. Or look at the histogram and get as close to the right wall as you can without climbing up the wall even a little.
Rule of thumb: background brighter - brighten, background darker - darken. The reason this seems backwards is that when the meter sees mostly very dark it wants to pull it up too much to the middle, so you compensate by moving it back darker. When the meter sees mostly bright it wants to pull it down to the middle, so you compensate by brightening/adding exposure.
The problem seems to be the minimum ISO setting, which is much to high when in auto ISO. Even if you have had the ISO set to 64 manualy before.My settings are. ISO Sensitivity 64, Sensitivity ON Max 12800, Minimum 1000, Manual Mode
I think the problem is that people are mentally bifurcating Auto ISO and metering as if Auto ISO has its own metering method and it doesn't (you'll see this in several of the posts here). When people say Auto ISO overexposes, underexposes, etc, that NOT the case and never is. The meter is over or under exposing and instead of using shutter speed or aperture to do it, it's using ISO. That's the only difference. If you were to set the camera for auto exposure in any other mode, you'd get the same amount of over / under exposure, etc.I shoot with a sony A1, any good info on this camera with auto Iso Steve ? On the settings inside of the camera..
thank You
Thanks so much SteveI think the problem is that people are mentally bifurcating Auto ISO and metering as if Auto ISO has its own metering method and it doesn't (you'll see this in several of the posts here). When people say Auto ISO overexposes, underexposes, etc, that NOT the case and never is. The meter is over or under exposing and instead of using shutter speed or aperture to do it, it's using ISO. That's the only difference. If you were to set the camera for auto exposure in any other mode, you'd get the same amount of over / under exposure, etc.
So, nope, nothing specific or special for Auto ISO with the Sony (or any camera) it's just doing what the meter tells it
Also, welcome to the forums
What is the "Minimum" you are referring to? I am guessing shutter speed? This only kicks in with aperture priority or program mode. @Steve on page 125-128 of this Z9/Z8 wildlife photography set up guide addresses the issue.My settings are. ISO Sensitivity 64, Sensitivity ON, Max 12800, Minimum 1000, Manual Mode
Are you talking about Z9 ? ... there is no minimum iso setting in auto ISO only minimum shutter speed. Since there is no mechanical shutter in a Z9 it seems you are talking about flash sync settings? Or referring to something other than a Z9 which is what the OP is asking about.Per the setting you described, I think your minimum is set to ISO 1000. In Auto ISO mode your camera won’t shoot below the minimum, so the camera is probably hitting max shutter speed and still over exposing. Try setting your minimum to 64 for bright sun and then move up for darker settings. I tend to use Auto ISO for a max, then manually bump up the actual ISO when it is a dim setting.
If you also use electronic first curtain shutter, some cameras restrict max shutter speed to 1/2000, which would make overexposure even more likely.
In bright sun you might be shooting at ISO 1000, 1/2000, f16 with current settings. You’d probably want to be closer to f/16, ISO64, 1/500.
Per the setting you described, I think your minimum is set to ISO 1000. In Auto ISO mode your camera won’t shoot below the minimum, so the camera is probably hitting max shutter speed and still over exposing. Try setting your minimum to 64 for bright sun and then move up for darker settings. I tend to use Auto ISO for a max, then manually bump up the actual ISO when it is a dim setting.
If you also use electronic first curtain shutter, some cameras restrict max shutter speed to 1/2000, which would make overexposure even more likely.
In bright sun you might be shooting at ISO 1000, 1/2000, f16 with current settings. You’d probably want to be closer to f/16, ISO64, 1/500.
Correct it does not since it is a Z9Canons can set an iso range including a minimum and maximum, but I don't think the OP's camera has that option.
If ISO is 64, increase shutter speed.Need some advise on auto iso, on a bright sunny day i cannot adjust for proper exposure. All my images are over exposed, on a dark situation I can adjust for proper exposure by using command dials. Auto iso on manual mode. Please advise. Z9- V. 5.0
Thank you
Louie D
You can use eposure compensation in mauell with auto-iso. It works perfectly fine.This may be more anecdotal than helpful, but for the first time I had an auto ISO issue while I was in Costa Rica. I never used auto ISO, always manual, so I repurposed the exp. compensation button. In CR, there was so much switching lighting conditions with fast moving birds, that I decided to use it. And much of the time, it would over-or-under expose. Since I couldn't use the exp. comp feature, I would read the value it applied to a correct image, and switch to manual using that value. Cumbersome and missed some shots, but it worked.