Canon R5ii & R1 : Orders being taken.

If you would like to post, you'll need to register. Note that if you have a BCG store account, you'll need a new, separate account here (we keep the two sites separate for security purposes).

Member's gallery
bleirer said:
I think 24 would be plenty except wildlife is so unpredictable we need to crop to 24 sometimes. For me the R5 is the better do everything camera, but I could see the R1 for events, sports, weddings, portraits, news.
Click to expand...
Yeah, I think 24MP is fine for most things but it is nice to have extra at times. The active follow AF for certain sports looks really cool. I think it would be interesting to try out. If it works as well as it appeared to, that will be a huge addition for sports shooters.
 
ajrmd said:
In my experience, the Nikon cameras are a bit more susceptible to moire though with the offset of providing sharper OOC files and they are better for landscape and astro work.
Click to expand...

I guess I'd have to see apples to apples evidence that they were sharper as a broad generalization. Maybe compare similarly priced models and similar lenses. Maybe a R1 or R5ii with a 600 f4 compared to a Z9 or Z8 with a 600 f4 with the same test scene
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top