- Post score: 13
- #26
Thanks Dave. Appreciate your comments and advice. The sharpening issue has been my biggest problem area in post processing and I was really happy to get your advice the first time I posted because it kicked off a round of research and practice sessions with LR, PS, and Topaz that has helped me identify the problem and then moderate my heavy handed approach. These processing programs are so powerful it is very easy to overdo everything and, for me, difficult to spot. Now I’m constantly asking myself “does the photo look natural, does it look the way I saw it, and is it too sharp.” One particular area of trouble for me has been sharpening while exporting and this is an area in which I continue to work and so appreciate your comments. While still struggling with post processing generally, I feel I’m beginning to get there, and so thanks again, much appreciated. PaulGreat series, love the light and the clouds and compositions.
To my eyes the rocks on the Grand, especially that first image are still a bit over sharpened but not nearly like the original series.
Sharpening and what constitutes 'too much' is in the eye of the beholder so others may find it just right but FWIW when teaching sharpening in PS classes the final step after checking fine detail and looking for obvious halos would be to toggle the sharpening on and off quickly and ask if the overall image looked realistic and sharp or looked harsh. For instance if green summer grass takes on the look of grass you wouldn't want to walk on for fear of slicing your feet or fur looks like a Brillo pad then the sharpening is likely excessive. To me the rock on the Grand Teton looks that way, too much striation and visible sharp lines along the rock faces but that's just my opinion viewing this on a laptop screen so others may see it differently.
I really like the series and love the light in several of those Mormon Row images. Really nice!
-Dave