Short answer, Yes it has, although latterly the camera has almost always been the camera as the instrument of choice. A privileged rearing in rural Africa has been equally essential in my professional life (ecologist, systematist, geologist) carrying out scientific surveys of biodiversity; these derived data are the quintessential foundation of informed decisions in conservation. Photography is integral to maximize the information on a museum specimen. Hence a big part of my photography has been and continues to be macro's. During my 14+ yrs employed as a curator of the largest scientific collections on the African continent, my film Nikons were recording every other day, and quite often photographing invertebrate for colleagues. (thanks be to the first digital cameras that cut costs vastly!)
To those who question my passion in obsessing about the natural world, I often quote the words of the well known doyen of wildlife management and conservation, Aldo Leopold, "A man may not care for golf and still be human, but the man who does not like to see, hunt, photograph, or otherwise outwit birds or animals is hardly normal. He is supercivilized, and I for one do not know how to deal with him. Babes do not tremble when they are shown a golf ball, but I should not like to own the boy whose hair does not lift his hat when he sees his first deer. We are dealing, therefore, with something that lies pretty deep."
Among his many, many icons of fine prose is his observation that " One of the penalties of an ecological education is that one lives alone in a world of wounds. ...."
Many of Leopold quotes are scattered across the internet, but this is the best anthology
For the first time, the most important quotations of the great conservationist Aldo Leopold, author of A Sand County Almanac, are gathered in one volume. From conservation education to wildlife ecology, from wilderness protection to soil and water conservation, the writings of Aldo Leopold...
books.google.co.uk