How many are not in a rush to buy the newest cameras

If you would like to post, you'll need to register. Note that if you have a BCG store account, you'll need a new, separate account here (we keep the two sites separate for security purposes).

Just curious
Is there a real need to rush to the newest camera?
How much improvement in your Photography do you get from a new camera?

Do you have attachment to your camera or is it just a tool?

Not sure if it just me I love watching the new cameras come out & reading reviews but happy with what I have or is that just living in the past.
I was very slow moving to digital from film as I didn't want to give up my camera that I had used for over 15 years.
Reading forums I feel ones like me a very rare 🤣
 
I like the specs and upgrades with the new models and could buy one along with a D780. However, my D750 and Z6 work exceptionally well and are still more capable than am I for the kinds of photography I do. I am looking at another Z lens or two because they are really good. But, I may be an outlier because I also still shoot some with an F100 and have used the Nikon1 J3 for my underwater work. Like the cameras, but will focus on glass for now.
 
Just curious
Is there a real need to rush to the newest camera?
Nope

How much improvement in your Photography do you get from a new camera?

Imo a better feature set, better AF performance, better DR, less noise aso are no improvement for my skills as a photog, they make things easier.
Back in the days we managed to get BIF shots with completely manual film cameras. (Took more skills than using todays D6 with a fast AF-s lens....)

Do you have attachment to your camera or is it just a tool?

Just a tool

Not sure if it just me I love watching the new cameras come out & reading reviews but happy with what I have
Looking at the vast number of people shooting older bodies and the revival of filmcameras overhere I’m sure you’re not alone

or is that just living in the past.
You’re living today don’t you? ‘Nuff said LOL
I was very slow moving to digital from film as I didn't want to give up my camera that I had used for over 15 years.
Me too but in my case it was due to the fact my employer was late to go digital.

Reading forums I feel ones like me a very rare 🤣

Better ‘rare’ than common LOL
 
I’m new to the DSLR Party so I have no interest in the mirrorless at this time. The DSLR does everything I need and much more and from what I’ve picked up from these forum, in most instances does it better. I’m not sure why everyone is so enamored with these cameras. Other than the increase in the number of focus points whats the attraction? Maybe down the road(way down the road ) these camera will be the next big thing but not yet.
 
Personally, I'll stay with DSLR for the moment (Except if the temptation is too strong :LOL: ).
Few reasons for that, the investment I did with my current gear setup (Prime and zoom lenses and bodies).
The investment to switch to a mirrorless body and slowly replace my current lenses by the new ones... Which are much more expensive than the previous lenses for DSLR (At least on Canon side).
And finally, I'm more than happy with my gear, it does everything I need and I'm not close to reach it's limits...

So yes, the new specs of the mirrorless looks really really good and are very tempting of course as a wildlife photographer, but I'll wait 6 month or a year before investing in a mirrorless body. I think many good think will come out in a year or so. So I'm not in a rush now.
 
Just curious
Is there a real need to rush to the newest camera?
How much improvement in your Photography do you get from a new camera?

It depends if one buys with one's eyes open and takes a calculated risk of being a guineapig. If the new camera is 1. (Big One) affordable and 2. Possibly relevant to needs, then I usually wait several months.
Big leap from from film to D60, and less to D7200, but I found the Df a game changer in one key aspect, thanks to its excellent D4 sensor. Shooting at ISO6400 and even higher was an eye opener and this ability continues to impress me with the current generation cameras with 20-24mp (main reason I bought a D780 for its Z6 sensor). Having used a F90x for many years, I have found the Df Autofocus delivered - even a killer even on flying and running subjects.

The D500 and D850 are the big enablers being so well rounded. Where and when it is called for, I am equally emphatic - when required - that the silent-shooting abilities are as crucial a game changer (with a Z MILC, or at a push a D780 / D850 in L'view using Hoodman on the LCD).

I must also underscore the excellent advantages of lighter telephotos with decent speed and reach in the pair of PF Nikkors. Prior to their release, admittedly we did have the choice of lighter 70-200 and 70-300 zooms but these were/are restricted by f4 and f5.6 respectively to reach to 500mm and more. Previously I had enjoyed the flexibility embodied in a compact light 400 f5.6AIS IFED, which went most places and delivered sans-support. The phase-fresnel AFC telephotos, 3 decades later, have clinched the loop and their AF have superseded the 1.2kg MF 400 f5.6AIS , weird as this may strike some of you!

Overall, looking back, I believe the AF revolution has been a game changer to grab the proverbial fleeting moment. Obviously the digital revolution has enabled all manner of advantages. Today, the advances are primarily in refinements in AF particularly as sensor technology is levelled off and 20mp/24mp is ideal in DX and FX respectively - albeit with the well understood advantages of 'Croppability' and future proofing in 45mp FX sensors.

I think we will see greater emphasis in refining the Haptics of cameras ie controls and menu options. Nikon does this pretty well already, but too often they leave glaring gaps. And/or too often Nikon reverses on features that work well in a camera!

Do you have attachment to your camera or is it just a tool?
Well, I have kept my Nikon F3 primarily because it was my workhorse and bought with an inheritance. Like a fine rifle or shotgun, one does grow to appreciate deeply a well designed camera that works well and reliably in adverse conditions. ditto a finely designed lens. Ultimately, my current cameras will be traded in or donated to a school photography club (which is a most deserving cause in Africa, particularly integral in conservation education).
I invest far more seriously into lenses, and still use a 55 f2.8AIS Micro-Nikkor that's been working since 1988.

Not sure if it just me I love watching the new cameras come out & reading reviews but happy with what I have or is that just living in the past.
I was very slow moving to digital from film as I didn't want to give up my camera that I had used for over 15 years.
Reading forums I feel ones like me a very rare 🤣
Partly because of the prices of a D1, D2 etc I only moved across from film finally in 2008, but I'd relied on a Coolpix for research over the previous decade.

It is the particular new lenses that match - if not exceed - any camera hyperbole :D Unlike a camera, the first tests and images are usually reliable indicators if a new lens is a keeper or not. Straightforward. The main reason to wait is for new prices to drop and/or a decent Used copy to appear (dumped by a frustrated gearhead!) Actually, this is how I bought my low-count D500 in London at almost half launch RRP. Same tactic with the Df.

Albeit looking back at 2018, the launch of the Z System ranks as relatively unique. The release of an entirely novel imaging system is a rare event, especially one with the potential of the universal Z Mount - and again its value is grounded centrally in the optics - existing and potential. So I got the first Z7 kit in S Africa (apparently) primarily for trials. This time I'm waiting to read the reviews, which will also wash out the more pernicious lurgies. As posted elsewhere, I'm waiting for firstly the E-manuals to check on Custom options (key AF controls being vital), and equally a trustworthy review or two. However, I'm quietly confident these Z II will be excellent - including for most demands in wildlife photography. So will probably buy a Z7 II next year.
 
Last edited:
Just curious
Is there a real need to rush to the newest camera?
How much improvement in your Photography do you get from a new camera?

Do you have attachment to your camera or is it just a tool?

Not sure if it just me I love watching the new cameras come out & reading reviews but happy with what I have or is that just living in the past.
I was very slow moving to digital from film as I didn't want to give up my camera that I had used for over 15 years.
Reading forums I feel ones like me a very rare 🤣
That question is like asking how long is a piece of string. The answer depends on your photographic needs. Any modern body can probably make awesome images of landscapes when mounted on a tripod. Any modern camera allows the user to adjust the settings necessary for the scene.

All that changes if one gets into astro-photography, wildlife, sports, etc. Different requirements make different bodies more suitable for a specific type of photography. Usually I feel the need for an upgrade when my current body has limitations that prevent me from getting the kind of image I want in a given situation. I also find as my photography skills improve I start seeing the shortcomings of my current camera body. That drives the need to upgrade for me.

Do I have an attachment to the camera? Absolutely, the same way I like using my own tools more than borrowed tools. There are numerous reasons why all of us purchase specific brands, be they cars, lawnmowers, TV sets or cameras. The borrowed tools will also get the job done, but often in a more onerous way. I enjoy working with a good tool of my choice and getting the best performance out of it. Photography is my hobby. I like making pictures and a large part of that enjoyment comes from using my own specific gear.
 
Last edited:
Is there a real need to rush to the newest camera?
Not for me. I tend to run a generation or two behind the latest and greatest cameras though I was a fairly early adopter of the D500. I usually wait for things to stabilize a bit and to learn about the inevitable quirks and work arounds but I also want to see a clear advantage for my personal uses before upgrading a camera body. My 'high res' camera was the D800 until earlier this year when I swapped that for a D850 and I ran a D4 until this spring when that was upgraded to a D5 mostly for its AF performance.

I'm much more excited by new lens offerings like when the 300mm PF and 500mm PF were released but less excited about the latest camera body releases.
 
As much as I hope the new cameras sell well, Nikon needs it, I’m in no rush to get a new camera. Not really interested in Z cameras right now, to much invested into F-mount gear and dont care much for the performance loss that comes though the adapter for the mirrorless cameras.
 
I was waiting for a 600 PF Z lens.Nikon has announced only a 600 S lens.I have learnt to think of lens first & hence i will wait for 600 PF else continue with my D 500, 850 & 500 PF.
Weight is the important parameter for my kind of shooting birds & i am pretty happy with my present setup
 
I was waiting for a 600 PF Z lens.Nikon has announced only a 600 S lens.I have learnt to think of lens first & hence i will wait for 600 PF else continue with my D 500, 850 & 500 PF.
Weight is the important parameter for my kind of shooting birds & i am pretty happy with my present setup
At this point, I'd be very surprized if there is a 600 f5.6 PF in F mount. The PF lens element is difficult to make and has been one of the largest factors in the slow production of the 500 PF. A 600 PF would have a larger element which would be even more difficult to manufacture and would probably require some of the resources currently dedicated to the 500PF. I'm sure it would be very popular and might just kill off demand for the 500PF but I just don't see it.
It seems to me that Nikon has committed to a mirrorless future and I'm not sensing any new developments in F mount lenses. We may seem some tweaks but I think Nikon will be putting their efforts into their mirrorless line going forward.
 
I am very well served by my D500 and my two PF lenses for what I do mainly, wildlife photography as a hobby; however, landscape photography takes also a small part of this hobby; with the arrival on the market of mirrorless, I am interested to make the acquisition of a second camera body full frame with a true wild-angle lens (my 17-55 DX is sometimes limited); it's for that reason that I look at Z6II and Z7II, considering also the possibility to use only either of this bodies for wildlife photography with my 300 PF and 500 PF; may be a chimera...
 
I don’t think I am particularly attached to my gear. Cameras and lenses are tools. But some improvements can be very helpful, especially in bird and other wildlife photography. I am lucky enough to be able to have multiple camera bodies — I kept my D500 and D850 when I got a Z7 and later a Z6. I really like the Z bodies and Z lenses. What I’d like improved are (i) faster auto-focus acquisition and better tracking (up to D500/D850 standard or better), (ii) more of a real time view in the EVF when at the highest frame rates (hate the current slideshow effect), and (iii) the ability to change auto-focus modes/areas with a single button press (as I can on a D500/D850).

Agree that we can’t know for sure how much improvements there have been in the new models until someone like Steve, Thom Hogan or Brad Hill gets one in hand and tries it out. I am optimistic that there will be improvement on at least two of my issues. I am also interested to see when Nikon releases the manuals for the new cameras, as it will tell me if they have added the ability to switch focus modes with a single button press.

Given the fall bird migration season in Minnesota is winding down and I have no trips scheduled before April/May of next year (assuming they go ahead), I have no pressure (other than a strong case of NAS/GAS) to try to buy one quickly. Spring bird migration here starts to pick up in mid- to late-March and it would be nice to have one for that (at least if I am going to get one).

So I am trying for now to hold off my NAS/GAS, waiting for more independent information and reviews.
 
That question is like asking how long is a piece of string. The answer depends on your photographic needs. Any modern body can probably make awesome images of landscapes when mounted on a tripod. Any modern camera allows the user to adjust the settings necessary for the scene.

All that changes if one gets into astro-photography, wildlife, sports, etc.

I humbly disagree.
You can shoot whatever you want with every camera on the market today.
I’ve seen great work from people shooting cameras lagging three generations behind in technology and trash from people shooting the very best up to date high end gear.
Like I said we used manual focus, manual exposure, fixed sensitivity (ISO400 was considered very sensitive) filmcameras with slow aperture non stabilized lenses/cameras back in the days and no matter their restrictions we managed to shoot anything one can shoot with todays high end gear too.

Different requirements make different bodies more suitable for a specific type of photography.

I agree, like I said the features set of a given camera will ease specific applications

Usually I feel the need for an upgrade when my current body has limitations that prevent me from getting the kind of image I want in a given situation.

With the exception for astro which demands other hardware there’s no limitation in current cameras preventing one to get ‘A shot’.
The keeperrate may vary, it may be easier/more difficult to accomplish a certain shot but in the end not the gear but the photog is the limiting factor.

The proof is all over the internet, still lots of people shooting ‘obsolete’ gear with great results.
It’s not about the latest and greatest it’s about knowing ones gear.

IMO
 
While I
At this point, I'd be very surprized if there is a 600 f5.6 PF in F mount. The PF lens element is difficult to make and has been one of the largest factors in the slow production of the 500 PF. A 600 PF would have a larger element which would be even more difficult to manufacture and would probably require some of the resources currently dedicated to the 500PF. I'm sure it would be very popular and might just kill off demand for the 500PF but I just don't see it.
It seems to me that Nikon has committed to a mirrorless future and I'm not sensing any new developments in F mount lenses. We may seem some tweaks but I think Nikon will be putting their efforts into their mirrorless line going forward.
While I don't have the statistics I am sure that there is a bigger market for PF telephoto lenses than the normal telephoto lenses.It may also be a good way to get Canon and Sony shooters to Nikon fold..
As far as weight is concerned it would be less than the present F4 lenses .
Of course Nikon has to get its manufacturing act together to produce PF lenses to meet the demand
 
As someone who remembers well making money with sports photography back when "frame rate" was dependent on how fast my thumb could move the film advance lever, I certainly do appreciate the advances in photographic technology. That said, I feel no need to go out and buy new equipment just because it is new, it has to provide something I don't have or a significant improvement over my current gear before I'll shell out the cash.
 
For me, it's an odd situation. From just a photography standpoint, I can get by with almost anything. I've taken shots that have been very popular, published, and sold well as prints with very basic equipment. However, as a "photographic educator" it's tricker since I need to keep up with the latest and greatest for videos, books, and workshops. Sort of a weird mental dichotomy.

The truth is, gear has long ago lost its luster for me. I look at cameras and lenses as a means to an end - little more than a bag of tools to get the job done. This doesn't mean I don't want good tools, just that I'm not usually very excited about them. My new D6 sat, unopened, in the brown UPS box for nearly a week before I actually bothered to open it.

For me, it's the experience of shooting. I enjoy going out, finding subjects, and sharing what I capture with the world (or as much of that world is willing to look at my work). One thing I tell people is that when I'm face to face with an exciting subject in the viewfinder, I am not thinking about the gear at all. In fact, at that very moment, I may not even know what camera I'm using. I'm totally in the moment, only thinking about the shot. That's where the real fun is :D

In the end, I'll pick the tools that I think will get the job done. If a new tool comes out that seems like it will make the job easier to get done (better AF, faster FPS, etc) or allow me to spend less time messing with settings and more time making (what I pass off as) art, then I'm interested.
 
As much as I hope the new cameras sell well, Nikon needs it, I’m in no rush to get a new camera. Not really interested in Z cameras right now, to much invested into F-mount gear and dont care much for the performance loss that comes though the adapter for the mirrorless cameras.
As far as I know any performance loss of F-mount lenses on Z bodies are not caused by the FTZ adapter. The adapter does not have any influence on the performance of the lens. Performance loss, primarily focus speed, is a function of the first generation Z bodies. Hopefully the new Z11 bodies will fix that.
 
Last edited:
No. I am prepared to forego any new or upgraded camera solution and wait.

Once the camera/lens has been on the market for a while and the hardware and firmware is 'known' then assess against my current kit to determine if there are tangible benefits in upgrading. I do not wish to migrate from a (normally) stable and known camera system to a new product that could be unstable or behaviour not properly understood. For me, this means a camera body update every 4-5 years, usually when the new camera is about 12 month on market.
 
Back
Top