The whole business concept of Nikon is to make and sell hardware. And to convince YOU to buy it.
As many units as they possibly can. Fast.
And if they don't - THEY DIE.
Bye bye Nikon
I hear you and yes its a good point, but prefer to look at it objectively.....
In nature the weak are left behind so the stronger gene pool survives for the health and survival of the species.
Letting other the key players do the R and D and investment then follow along with a me to agonizingly later saves a lot of money.
Nikon is defiantly putting lots of money away and into some infrastructure like a green head office worth millions and millions, yet while cutting costs and increasing margins seems logical and i used to get paid to do it to please stakeholders with high expectations, it should never be at the expense of cutting QC or causing trust issues or brand damage.
I think the last two years hasn't been all that enjoyable from a consumer perspective, especially in time and trust.
Nikon has caught up closer to Sony and Canon recently and holding 3rd position in my opinion, now Sony and Canon are moving ahead possibly with some quantum change it seems, with Nikon no doubt will be offering updated pro level cameras again soon, so the question begs to be asked, will we be trailing behind again and playing catch up again, now i don't mind that so much, but QC, design or trust issues is not what should be included in the pro level products like has gone by over the past 18monmths plus, just don't want to keep going through that again, its so unnecessary and really unavoidable.
Its so insignificant in cost to manage QC protocols properly.........its arrogant to let them occur.
If Nikon went Bye Bye so be it.........they don't have much market share left anyway unless i am mistaken.
And i am a Nikon owner and supporter..........but have a standard.
Yes most companies have some form of issues, but that's no real excuse as standards will drop.
Only an opinion