I’ve wondered how this lens would do with frogs and the like. Would love to hear from people who have tried. Or see some sample photos.but really can't wait to use it for wildlife subjects (rather than my 105 macro) such as frogs.
If you would like to post, you'll need to register. Note that if you have a BCG store account, you'll need a new, separate account here (we keep the two sites separate for security purposes).
I’ve wondered how this lens would do with frogs and the like. Would love to hear from people who have tried. Or see some sample photos.but really can't wait to use it for wildlife subjects (rather than my 105 macro) such as frogs.
Link?
I’ve wondered how this lens would do with frogs and the like. Would love to hear from people who have tried. Or see some sample photos.
Link?
I dunno. I think it was on IG, likely; as I follow him there.Link?
Thanks for your kind words. For these the birds were between 25 and 30 feet away so some cropping doneBohdan, those are awesome shots of the Jay in flight. Great example of what Plena can do for wildlife.
For the two photos, did you need to significantly crop, or were you able to get that close to the birds?
Well done, thank you for posting these!
Thank you Karen for steering me here. Looks like a great place to learn as well as appreciate the talented photographers here.Welcome, Bob! Thanks for joining us here on BCG!
Great photos showing the use of the Plena for BIFs.
I'm looking forward to more posts from your extensive galleries and your on-going shooting efforts!
Nice! How did you get t close? Or are these cropped?I bought the plena explicitly for a recent iceland trip.
Oh, the limit's we place upon ourselves...... So much for genre restrictions..... LOL!
Muffins right. Take a muffin home. ️There is a place in the very east of iceland where the puffins are really close . U could catch one and take it home with you. so. No cropping required.
I have only used the Plena for a few times now. A relative kindly lends me her precious Plena sometimes. I love the look through the viewfinder. In fact I love it enough that I have started to think again about the my lens line up. I no longer own a F mount 70-200 F 2.8. The only focal lengths missing between 14 and 600 could be filled by the Z mount 70-200 F 2.8. I have the Z 85 F 1.8 and the Z 105 F 2.8. I could buy the 70-200 or I could buy the Plena and the gap would cease to be relevant. They are around the same price.A 105mm and the 70-200mm zoom lens provide far more capabilities. 135mm is too long a focal length in most indoor situations and outdoors the 70-200mm provides more image compression. The 105mm field of view and image compression is more like what our mind's eye perceives in a scene. So many images have clutter around the main subject with the use of the 50mm lens. The adage about getting closer to subjects to have stronger images speaks to this problem of what to leave out of the frame.
When Nikon was selling the two remarkable DC (defocus control) lenses in 105mm and 135mm focal lengths the 105mm outsold the 135mm by 2 to 1. The problems with using a 135mm focal length lens indoors was a key factor.
A faster lens was very important with film were color chrome was limited to IS 160 and Black & White to ISO 400. Since at least 2008 that has not been an issue with ISO 3200 sensors producing great images. Even with the D3 a f/2.8 lens was all that was needed for effective autofocus.