Nikon Z 24-120f4 S lens

[Gaduf]

I'm considering purchasing the Z8 and trading in my 24-120f4G VR Lens for the new Z 24-120S lens.
Are any of you using the new Z equivalent and what are your findings in terms of performance?
I have seen some mixed reviews on the internet.
Gavin

 

[hrv]

I absolutely love that lens. It is my go-to lens for anything non-wildlife related. It is super sharp.

 

[Gaduf]

I absolutely love that lens. It is my go-to lens for anything non-wildlife related. It is super sharp.

Many thanks for the prompt response HRV,
You mention non wildlife - any specific reason?
Gavin

 

[theEntreriCode]

I never liked my F mount version but the Z is a class apart. It’s put paid to any desire I had for a 24-70 F2.8. I would highly recommend it for an all rounder.

 

[Gaduf]

I never liked my F mount version but the Z is a class apart. It’s put paid to any desire I had for a 24-70 F2.8. I would highly recommend it for an all rounder.

Many thanks for the feedback T.
Agree that this is a good all rounder option.
Gavin

 

[Geoff_G]

Yes, the Z mount version is much better than any of the F mount variants.

 

[Butlerkid]

All the reviews I have seen are very, very positive. Even Brad Hill recommends it highly.

 

[Gaduf]

Yes, the Z mount version is much better than any of the F mount variants.

Thanks Geoff,
Appreciate the feedback.
Gavin

 

[Gaduf]

All the reviews I have seen are very, very positive. Even Brad Hill recommends it highly.

Many thanks Karen,
Will look at Brad Hill's comments.
Gavin

 

[Nimi]

Here is a thread on it:

Walkaround lens for Z9?

I recently took the mirrorless plunge, picked up a mint used Z9 (coming from a D500). This is my first full-frame, so I have a mix of FX and DX glass from 11mm all the way up to 600mm. I’m looking for a walkaround, general purpose lens to take the place of my DX 18-200mm VRII. Something that I...

bcgforums.com

 

[hrv]

You mention non wildlife - any specific reason?

Yes, I need a much longer focal length for wildlife. Birds especially, but also large mammals are often pretty far away. On average I will shoot at 500 - 560 mm depending on what lens I have on. In a hide, I start with 400mm and have a 100-400 on a second body.

 

[Patrick M]

I have a really great selection of Z lenses. Last fall, we did a cruise - New York then up the east coast to Boston, continuing up to the St Lawrence river and south to Quebec then finally Montreal. I took ONLY the z24-120mm F4 S and it really was perfect. The fall colours, the cities, the parks, etc etc etc . Wonderful lens. I had the 24-70/4, and while I had it my 70-200 was my go anywhere lens. Now its the 24-120.

 

[Gaduf]

Here is a thread on it:

Walkaround lens for Z9?

I recently took the mirrorless plunge, picked up a mint used Z9 (coming from a D500). This is my first full-frame, so I have a mix of FX and DX glass from 11mm all the way up to 600mm. I’m looking for a walkaround, general purpose lens to take the place of my DX 18-200mm VRII. Something that I...

bcgforums.com

Many thanks Nimi,
This thread has fully answered my queries,
Regards
Gavin

 

[Gaduf]

I have a really great selection of Z lenses. Last fall, we did a cruise - New York then up the east coast to Boston, continuing up to the St Lawrence river and south to Quebec then finally Montreal. I took ONLY the z24-120mm F4 S and it really was perfect. The fall colours, the cities, the parks, etc etc etc . Wonderful lens. I had the 24-70/4, and while I had it my 70-200 was my go anywhere lens. Now its the 24-120.

Appreciate your feedback Patrick,
Following your response and all the others I have decided to go for the Z24-120 S lens,
Regards,
Gavin

 

[Richard_M]

I really like the Z 24-120mm. After a few outings I sold my Z 24-70 f/4.0

On an overseas trip earlier this year I used it as a general purpose lens with my Z 6II

#1 I used it for closeup photography

#2 Landscapes

#3 And while photographing fungi this (New Zealand) North Island Robin came if for a look

 

[abc123brian]

I really like it and it’s my most used non wildlife lens. I was hesitant to get it based on reviews of the f mount version and waited to order until after it was out for a while. I’ve been very happy with it. The only somewhat negative review of it I saw said the corners aren’t as good as the other Z lenses in a comparison by Thomas Heaton. Though I do wonder if there are some variations in copies of it or if I just haven’t noticed it.

 

[Charles Loy]

re: trading in my 24-120f4G VR Lens for the new Z 24-120S lens - Good plan cause you can't sell the f4G, it's value dropped like a rock.
24-120S is the real deal, just get it asap

 

[coachjohn57]

The 24-120S is a great bit of kit at a very reasonable price; it was the first Z mount I purchased and I’ve never second guessed acquiring it.

 

[Geoff_G]

I actually sold my 24-120 g version to get the 16-80 Dx variant which, IMO was optically better and definitely smaller and lighter. I eventually sold it as well and got the 24-70/2.8E which I really liked. But when I decided to go Mirrorless I preordered the S version (along with the 100-400 S) when I preordered my Z9. I'm not one bit sorry as it is my walk around and do-everything lens.

 

[John Navitsky]

the only mixed reviews i’ve seen are about the f-mount version. i personally think the z mount lens is great. it’s sharp, versatile and light. the af is even fast enough to capture some action.

 

[Gaduf]

I really like the Z 24-120mm. After a few outings I sold my Z 24-70 f/4.0

On an overseas trip earlier this year I used it as a general purpose lens with my Z 6II

#1 I used it for closeup photography

#2 Landscapes

#3 And while photographing fungi this (New Zealand) North Island Robin came if for a look

Many thanks for the feedback and for sharing the images,
Regards,
Gavin

 

[Gaduf]

I really like it and it’s my most used non wildlife lens. I was hesitant to get it based on reviews of the f mount version and waited to order until after it was out for a while. I’ve been very happy with it. The only somewhat negative review of it I saw said the corners aren’t as good as the other Z lenses in a comparison by Thomas Heaton. Though I do wonder if there are some variations in copies of it or if I just haven’t noticed it.

Appreciate your feedback Brian,
Thanks for the heads up,
Gavin

 

[Gaduf]

re: trading in my 24-120f4G VR Lens for the new Z 24-120S lens - Good plan cause you can't sell the f4G, it's value dropped like a rock.
24-120S is the real deal, just get it asap

Will do Charles,
Many Thanks for the feedback,
Gavin

 

[Gaduf]

The 24-120S is a great bit of kit at a very reasonable price; it was the first Z mount I purchased and I’ve never second guessed acquiring it.

Thanks John!

 

[Gaduf]

I actually sold my 24-120 g version to get the 16-80 Dx variant which, IMO was optically better and definitely smaller and lighter. I eventually sold it as well and got the 24-70/2.8E which I really liked. But when I decided to go Mirrorless I preordered the S version (along with the 100-400 S) when I preordered my Z9. I'm not one bit sorry as it is my walk around and do-everything lens.

Thanks Geoff!
Gavin