Telephoto Lens ‘That Has Never Existed Before’? Sigma 300-600 f4

If you would like to post, you'll need to register. Note that if you have a BCG store account, you'll need a new, separate account here (we keep the two sites separate for security purposes).

Wow! Two other old guys…now there’s three! I also shot a lot of tri-x. The contrast was good…. But plus-x was a tad better with grain and panatomic-x @ 32asa was really fine but the contrast was terrible. I’m probably mis-remembering some stuff too. I remember using microdol-x and Agfa paper (brovara, portriga?) when I could find it…. Memory lane is full of potholes ya’ know..😅
About 1969 I was pushing Tri-X to ASA 1600 to shoot by available light in jazz clubs using Acufine developer. ASA 400 was the fastest film at the time without special processing. ASA stands for American Standards Association and was how film speed was rated until we got PC and switched the term to ISO or International Standards Organization.

I was a regular at the Lighthouse Cafe in Hermosa Beach for years until they found out I was under 21. LOL
 

Not a lens that has never been done before. Even Sigma has made a very similar 800 f/5.6 before.
 
Last edited:
About 1969 I was pushing Tri-X to ASA 1600 to shoot by available light in jazz clubs using Acufine developer. ASA 400 was the fastest film at the time without special processing. ASA stands for American Standards Association and was how film speed was rated until we got PC and switched the term to ISO or International Standards Organization.

I was a regular at the Lighthouse Cafe in Hermosa Beach for years until they found out I was under 21. LOL
Yo….old guy😅…..yup, pushed my share of Tri-X to 1600 back in the 60’s too. Actually kept one Nikkor reel & tank for sentimental reasons… Thought about posting a picture of it here and seeing if anyone under 40 knew what it was….🤷🏼‍♀️🤔
 
It's a 300-600 f4 Sport :)


It will likely not be for Canon or Nikon, because Sigma is not permitted to make any Z mount lenses and I think only APS-C R mount lenses. Sigma full frame mirrorless lenses are for Sony and Leica. The heavy weight was for their SLR lenses; the new Sigma 500 f5.6 for mirrorless I believe is light weight? And if, as they say, it is a lens that has never existed, surely people will be interested.
 
Yo….old guy😅…..yup, pushed my share of Tri-X to 1600 back in the 60’s too. Actually kept one Nikkor reel & tank for sentimental reasons… Thought about posting a picture of it here and seeing if anyone under 40 knew what it was….🤷🏼‍♀️🤔
I borrowed a friends Nikon F2 with a handheld Seconic and a 50mm/f2, it was the first time I looked through and camera and pondered, "why"?

Having found a new passion, from the very beginning I actually shot ONLY chrome because I wanted to see the actual results nearly immediately.

Seeing as I was experimenting, this made sense. What I didn't know at the time was that it also forced me to learn exposure very quickly without the leeway that negatives allowed, as well as seeing my work in just a few hours. I worked at a pro lab so I could run film for free and the supply shop gave industry employees a discount.

Being drawn to night scenes, then of course I was pushing 400 chrome to 1600 all the time and learning to hand hold to 1/30 as a standard and slower under pressure. This was all on 35mm and a Nikon F3 HP. Some of the old images are still on my website.

I was self taught for the first couple yrs, then worked as an assistant in a major player Chicago studio after several assisting jobs trying to find my way.

Later I found some love for B&W but by then I had my vision for what I wanted where color had nothing to do with the message. Some work however went in the direction of monochromatic scenes or a reduced palette which I still love to explore now.
 
Back
Top