Women Handholding Large Primes

If you would like to post, you'll need to register. Note that if you have a BCG store account, you'll need a new, separate account here (we keep the two sites separate for security purposes).

I’m in my mid 50’s and I can handhold a Nikon 120-300 2.8. I’m trying to decide if that means I can handhold a Nikon 600 TC for an upcoming trip to Africa. I’ll be renting it for a trial in the next few months.
Perhaps post a thread in the Destination/Africa forum with more details about where in Africa you will be going, will it be a dedicated photo safari or a tour catering to the general public, etc. Then we can better advise you as to lenses and support, among other things.
 
Thank you. Everything I read this lens is being used with a Z8 or 9. I am hoping to get results with my Nikon Z7
I have a Nikon Z7, I bought it when it first came out. I consider that camera a landscape/nature camera. I use my Z8, I have two, for wildlife and did use a Z9. For wildlife I like a fast camera with high fps and a large and fast buffer rate, this makes shooting a lot easier. I started photographing wildlife with a D800 and then later on with a D850, I learned the differences in different camera uses along the way. There was some frustration on my part with the slower cameras. Here is what one review said, "Generally good performance for its class, but somewhat limited buffer." I learned quickly that the buffer was very important in wildlife photography. I've included the review below. I think you start out shooting with what you have, learn about wildlife photography, and then along the way you figure out what works for you and what your equipment needs are. If it's portrait type shots the Z7 is fine, if you get into wildlife in action shots it may be a bit slower and less accurate than some of the newer Z cameras. I love the Z8, which is why I bought the second one, but I found the Z9 a bit heavy and bulky so sold it once I tried out the Z8. I still use my Z7 as a lighter camera for landscape/nature shots.

https://www.imaging-resource.com/PRODS/nikon-z7/nikon-z7A6.HTM
 
I have a Nikon Z7, I bought it when it first came out. I consider that camera a landscape/nature camera. I use my Z8, I have two, for wildlife and did use a Z9. For wildlife I like a fast camera with high fps and a large and fast buffer rate, this makes shooting a lot easier. I started photographing wildlife with a D800 and then later on with a D850, I learned the differences in different camera uses along the way. There was some frustration on my part with the slower cameras. Here is what one review said, "Generally good performance for its class, but somewhat limited buffer." I learned quickly that the buffer was very important in wildlife photography. I've included the review below. I think you start out shooting with what you have, learn about wildlife photography, and then along the way you figure out what works for you and what your equipment needs are. If it's portrait type shots the Z7 is fine, if you get into wildlife in action shots it may be a bit slower and less accurate than some of the newer Z cameras. I love the Z8, which is why I bought the second one, but I found the Z9 a bit heavy and bulky so sold it once I tried out the Z8. I still use my Z7 as a lighter camera for landscape/nature shots.

https://www.imaging-resource.com/PRODS/nikon-z7/nikon-z7A6.HTM
Thank you so much. I can only afford lens or camera upgrade. Was hoping the 400 prime would be easy to run out when eagles and herons, hawks come across the street. Here is yesterday from my balcony on tripod with Sigma @600. edited in LR. The link did not work but will look up. Thanks for taking the time.
 

Attachments

  • eagleoct1.jpeg
    eagleoct1.jpeg
    243.8 KB · Views: 38
  • eagleflying5th-2.jpeg
    eagleflying5th-2.jpeg
    203.3 KB · Views: 42
I'm a 77 year old female and regularly handhold a 180-600 mounted on my Z9. In my bag, I carry a 2nd Z9 with a 70-200 F mount attached via an FTZii adapter PLUS the Z mount 24-120. My travel tripod and gimbal head also go into my camera backpack. No idea how much all that weighs, but I'm so accustomed to hiking quite long distances over terrain of varying difficulty with it that it feels very strange when I'm not lugging all that gear.
I also shoot handheld with the 400mm f2.8 TC mounted on the Z9. On those occasions I don't usually carry quite so much extra gear in my backpack - just the second Z9 with a lens attached and my gimbal head and travel tripod.

I want to be you when I grow up. Do you mind sharing what backpack you use for all that gear?
 
I have switched to Olympus (now OM systems) and love the weight, size and reach. I put the 150-400 on a tripod but handhold the 100-400 (kind of gives a 200-800 range).
 
It isn’t just women that have issues with big lenses…us menfolk do as well. I can handhold the 600PF fine but for anything more than a couple of minutes prefer a mono or tripo pod. The 180-600 gets heavy after 30 seconds or so, and the 100-400 is just fine. Despite being in almost the best shape of my life due to 2000 miles a year on the road bike…I’m 70 and it’s harder than it used to be…although when I was a low 3 hour marathon runner earlier in life (the best shape I’ve been in) even then long lenses were a problem for extended waits on something to happen.
 
As a female , 68 year old shooter, I‘m curious what other women my age on this site are using for their super telephotos and whether they handhold them much. I’m in pretty goid shape apart from some rotater cuff issues. I can handhold the Sony 600mm GM for short periods. Thanks
My wife shoots with the OM-1 and Olympus MFT lenses that weigh half as much as their full size counterparts and also cost half as much. Her images have been on par with the ones I have shot with a D850 and Z9 camera.
 
It isn’t just women that have issues with big lenses…us menfolk do as well. I can handhold the 600PF fine but for anything more than a couple of minutes prefer a mono or tripo pod. The 180-600 gets heavy after 30 seconds or so, and the 100-400 is just fine. Despite being in almost the best shape of my life due to 2000 miles a year on the road bike…I’m 70 and it’s harder than it used to be…although when I was a low 3 hour marathon runner earlier in life (the best shape I’ve been in) even then long lenses were a problem for extended waits on something to happen.
Edit: We are lucky that lenses are getting lighter as we age. I find my wife and I can share the burden of these items on walks.
 
Last edited:
Edit: We are lucky that lenses are getting lighter as we age. I find my wife and I can share the burden of these items on walks.
I wish…my wife steadfastly and adamantly refuses to be my Sherpa. She will consent to being a sweetie Shoulder-pod…and will pull stuff out of the backpack and provide a 3rd hand…carrying my stuff isn’t happening. She shoots with a Z50 2 lens kit and simply won’t carry any more.
 
I’m 60.I recently went to a z9 for the lenses. I hand hold the z 600 6.3 easily.
Had the f 200-500 and could not handhold that for very long.
Same here exactly. Z9 with z600 6.3. I had the 500 5.6 pf and before that had to use a monopod or tripod with the 200-500. Both the 500 5.6 and 600 6.3 are amazingly light and manageable. I understand the want of the 600 f4 but it's just not fun to carry and lug around and I feel tied down.
 
Same here exactly. Z9 with z600 6.3. I had the 500 5.6 pf and before that had to use a monopod or tripod with the 200-500. Both the 500 5.6 and 600 6.3 are amazingly light and manageable. I understand the want of the 600 f4 but it's just not fun to carry and lug around and I feel tied down.
Exactly the reason I don’t have either of the TC Z lenses…too much weight for too little gain and too much loss of overall flexibility for my needs And wants.
 
Many years ago I switched to using neoprene camera straps and my neck benefited greatly. I use the Kirk Enterprises Security Strap for heavy lenses as it clamps to any Arca-Swiss foot and no worries about the connection coming loose and the camera and lens hitting the ground. The Kirk strap is used primarily with the 800mm PF lens. With the strap the weight is carried by one shoulder and I use one hand to keep it from swinging and my other hand is completely free. Much simpler to move over rough terrain and through the brush.

The 100-400mm with the 1.4x TC provides me with an 560mm lens that is very light and the advantages of a zoom lens. I found over time that I was not using the 400mm f/4.5 at all and sold it. With the 800mm PF there would be no gain with the 600mm PF lens where I shoot as camera to subject distances tend to be 100 feet or more. A 300-800mm S-mount zoom would be something I would buy if it existed.

Back in the DSLR age many professional travel and lifestyle photographers switched to using APS-C cameras and lenses to have a lighter and more compact kit. Now the MFT cameras and lenses provide similar advantages. My Costa Rica kit in a 32L backpack weighs around 37 lbs and my wife's MFT kit weighs half as much and it is carried inside an 18L backpack. She never needs to decide which lenses to leave behind and can easily take them all.
 
Last edited:
Fun thread! It's encouraging to see how many of us older women are here--and how many older than me are carrying as much or more. I'm 67 and can easily carry the Z9 or Z8 with the 600PF walking all day; I use a Black Rapid "Retro" sling strap and what I love is that I can pretty much be hands-free and just let it hang (of course with a safety strap on it.) This way I can use my binoculars concurrently. I did try the 180-600 Z but found it too heavy and now my spouse is using that. I still have my beloved 500 F4E and may still sometimes take that on safari for it's speed, I can handhold it for short amounts of time in the safari vehicle, but can't really walk and shoot with it for too long. My tripod gathers dust but I suppose if I took the 500F4 out locally I might still use it someday :)

My dilemma now is trying to figure out how to carry two heavy-ish cameras while walking/hiking, for an upcoming trip (Puma tracking in Patagonia) I'm going to want to carry both the Z9 with the 600PF and the Z8 with the 100-400, both at the ready. Not sure how I'm going to manage that. It's not only the weight, but too many straps! (binoculars too!)
 
Fun thread! It's encouraging to see how many of us older women are here--and how many older than me are carrying as much or more. I'm 67 and can easily carry the Z9 or Z8 with the 600PF walking all day; I use a Black Rapid "Retro" sling strap and what I love is that I can pretty much be hands-free and just let it hang (of course with a safety strap on it.) This way I can use my binoculars concurrently. I did try the 180-600 Z but found it too heavy and now my spouse is using that. I still have my beloved 500 F4E and may still sometimes take that on safari for it's speed, I can handhold it for short amounts of time in the safari vehicle, but can't really walk and shoot with it for too long. My tripod gathers dust but I suppose if I took the 500F4 out locally I might still use it someday :)

My dilemma now is trying to figure out how to carry two heavy-ish cameras while walking/hiking, for an upcoming trip (Puma tracking in Patagonia) I'm going to want to carry both the Z9 with the 600PF and the Z8 with the 100-400, both at the ready. Not sure how I'm going to manage that. It's not only the weight, but too many straps! (binoculars too!)
I usually put the smaller lens around my neck and the 600pf across my shoulder. It can get confusing at times but you get used to it. Who are you using for the Puma trip?
 
I usually put the smaller lens around my neck and the 600pf across my shoulder. It can get confusing at times but you get used to it. Who are you using for the Puma trip?
Problem is I always wear large binoculars as well, since we are birders. The Chile trip is for birds and pumas so we are doing a privately guided trip with Albatross Birding. Four days of puma tracking and the rest is birding. For the birding part I'll only need to carry the 600PF but for the pumas my understanding is that they can come rather close, actually the 180-600 would be the perfect single lens but spouse will be using it.
 
Fun thread! It's encouraging to see how many of us older women are here--and how many older than me are carrying as much or more. I'm 67 and can easily carry the Z9 or Z8 with the 600PF walking all day; I use a Black Rapid "Retro" sling strap and what I love is that I can pretty much be hands-free and just let it hang (of course with a safety strap on it.) This way I can use my binoculars concurrently. I did try the 180-600 Z but found it too heavy and now my spouse is using that. I still have my beloved 500 F4E and may still sometimes take that on safari for it's speed, I can handhold it for short amounts of time in the safari vehicle, but can't really walk and shoot with it for too long. My tripod gathers dust but I suppose if I took the 500F4 out locally I might still use it someday :)

My dilemma now is trying to figure out how to carry two heavy-ish cameras while walking/hiking, for an upcoming trip (Puma tracking in Patagonia) I'm going to want to carry both the Z9 with the 600PF and the Z8 with the 100-400, both at the ready. Not sure how I'm going to manage that. It's not only the weight, but too many straps! (binoculars too!)
Double BR strap is what I use.
 
I'll look at that. I actually just started a thread on this so as not to hijack this one.
I bought one instead of a second regular BR. With the double the right side camera is on the right shoulder and vice versa with the two straps held together in front and back. I tried disassembling and crisscrossing the straps and that didn’t work right at ll so back to the same side config. I have a ThinkTank belt and several pouches for batteries, TC and stuff…tried those and they don’t work with the double strap but do work with the single if the pouches are on the other side from the camera…I usually use my lightweight BigPockets vest and cargo shorts pockets for the ancillary stuff. If my wife is with me we usually take a couple of Rick Steves really small backpacks (like 6 or 9 liter small) for snacks and water.
 
I use a Black Rapid Nicole Elliot strap that I bought quite a few years ago but does not appear to be made any longer. You may be able to find it used online. It has a much wider piece of fabric that sits at the shoulder and distributes the weight a little bit better - though not a lot. I attach my camera with a QD strap swivel to a plate so I can easily take the camera off for a break either putting it down somewhere or attaching to a tripod. Since I leave the strap on the main thing is to always remember to reattach the camera to the strap immediately especially if using a lighter lens that I can just let hand down from the strap. With a heavy lens it's usually two hands on the lens all the time if it's on the strap.
I found one on eBay and love it. Thanks!!
 
Back
Top