HRB
Well-known member
I find it odd that the 400mm f 4.5 is not identified as a "Pf" lens... true?
If you would like to post, you'll need to register. Note that if you have a BCG store account, you'll need a new, separate account here (we keep the two sites separate for security purposes).
I don’t find it odd if Nikon is trying to normalize the use of PF glass going forward and we start to see more of it used to varying degrees in the future. Nikon used to badge lenses that had a nano crystal coat and they don’t bother with that anymore.I find it odd that the 400mm f 4.5 is not identified as a "Pf" lens... true?
And when it arrives, 95-99% of those who get it won't learn how to really use it to the fullest, if hardly any at all.us nikon peeps agree. it’ll come.
Nailed it. I really wanted the F 200-500. But it was about 18 months, 18!! before I took it on an expedition and really got 100% out of it. I’d love this 400mm but only because I’m a gear head …And when it arrives, 95-99% of those who get it won't learn how to really use it to the fullest, if hardly any at all.
I also am continuously intrigued by Nikon's new gear, and end up with a chronic case of NAS. I have to quit this habit, because If I don't, I'll never be able to retire.Nailed it. I really wanted the F 200-500. But it was about 18 months, 18!! before I took it on an expedition and really got 100% out of it. I’d love this 400mm but only because I’m a gear head …