macwalter
Well-known member
I don’t use pre capture as it is only jpg on the z8. I like raw and will stay there.
Z8/Z9 with diving birds
- Thread starter Matt N
- Start date
If you would like to post, you'll need to register. Note that if you have a BCG store account, you'll need a new, separate account here (we keep the two sites separate for security purposes).
I too would love to have raw pre-capture. But even if pre-capture was available in raw, forgive me if i am wrong , but I don't think the AF would be any different.
macwalter
Well-known member
I would imagine it wouldn’t be but you could focus on the perched bird and use pre capture to try and grab it as it takes off but if it goes in Amy direction where the focal length changes even by a little the camera will likely not keep up. If the light is good maybe open up the aperture a bit, or is it close? What I mean is go to a higher number for more depth of field
ajrmd
Well-known member
It’s difficult to say. At least one might have a couple images in focus. If one is planning on shooting take offs, changing the af response to erratic, may and I say may improve success. I’m frequently frustrated with the Z8’s af system for certain BIF scenarios. It can track and follow large birds and raptors easily in some circumstances, and at other times fail. It can follow a diving pelican or tern, but struggles to keep up with passerines headed towards the camera (that’s difficult for most systems). Other times, I’m pleasantly surprised when it captures a string of a couple in-focus frames when a large bird blasts off. The af system is pretty good, though there is a lot of room for improvement.
Totally agree with you!
Bevan
New member
Beautiful work buddy.
macwalter
Well-known member
I find the AF on the z8 to be predictable in terms of being only able to do so much. In other words, if I am on the subject and it is not too far away or small and there is not much clutter around it can do a superb job. However if i don’t have as good a lock on the subject and there are distractions in the area like branches, grass or otherwise then things can go south very fast. But to honest I expect this and it is so superior to the dslr I had in the past. I think for me lots of practice and experimenting with various situations have given me a better awareness of what I can hope to get. That being said I often go out and miss what should be an easy mark because I’m just a little slow. It doesn’t take much. Usually if I can get the little green box on the eye or at least the body I have A pretty good chance of getting something worthwhile. I’m sure those like Steve are way better at this than I. But I like a challenge. Lately I’ve been going out with the 600pf with the 1.4tc to practice BIF etc. my hit rate is poor but as I improve when I go back to the bare 600 it gets easier.
O
Well-known member
There is a real case for going mirror less and the new glass especially the TCs, awesome outcomes.
macwalter
Well-known member
Mirrorless cameras are way superior for any type of wildlife photography. They speed and no blackouts while shooting bursts. The in camera stabilization, the fact you can actually see the results of exposure compensation just to name a few. The glass is better with better sharpness in the corners and having more control on the the lens itself comes in very handy. This is my opinion and to be fair I got great shots with a d850 amd the 500pf and others as well. I don’t worry about weight as my current gear weighs about the same as my dslr gear. Personally I like a bit of weight to help keep things steady. Just not trying to handhold a 600f4 tc.