ElenaH
Well-known member
Oh, I am not from US but I see the point.Unsettled law, but there is a doubt whether photos generated "automatically" can be copyrighted in the US.
However, there are a lot of Award-winning images taken by a trap-cam setup.
Do you remember a Siberian Tiger in "Wildlife Photographer of the Year" ? I don't remember which year it was but the picture won an award and was taken with Z6 or Z7 in such setup. I remember it because I asked myself how the power-supply was solved for letting camera for a month (or three months?) in wilderness...
Then there was an image of owl in BPOTY with such setup. Then there was an image of melanistic leopard (black panther) of Burrard Lukas. There are a lot of his images which are known and I think, they don't rise some questions about copyright?
Even I was asked for permission to use an image in Catalogue of Kgalagadi Leopards taking by trap-cam setup. Actually, they didn't ask me how it was taken ;-)
I even tend to think that it is somehow a future of photography and movie-making - artists will place cameras in a vicinity of an animal's life (nests, holes, carcases, waterholes, paths, point of interest, etc...) and won't disturb them for a long time. There are already a lot of streaming channels of african waterholes. The equipment will get better and such streaming will be of better quality. But, Ok, It was only my opinion. The formal copyright legacy part must catch up with technological progress IMO.