DsD
Well-known member
Thanks Eric if that was directed toward me. I'm moving to all Z lens for the Z9 as they are smaller and mostly lighter, but I still have the 200-500 in my stable. Probably should just stick with what I already have.
If you would like to post, you'll need to register. Note that if you have a BCG store account, you'll need a new, separate account here (we keep the two sites separate for security purposes).
Ok, So I think I have a new go-to tripod head. pan and tilt on the Benro wh15 are fluid dampened and seem adequate to control "sticktion" at the start and stop of camera movement. The counterbalance is far more than needed. A pro body on a 600 f4E only needs a setting of 4 out of 8 and generally does a good job of holding position when you let go, bumping the counterweight up to 5 requires drag to be set which might impact sticktion just a touch. As of right now the only gripe I might have is the pan lock lever is a bit small and tucked in so quick manipulation might take a little getting used to. Any questions while Im playing with it?Thanks Wes. My ADD might be why I missed your earlier post about buying this head. Interested to get your read on it.
Plus, 75* was just for illustrative purposes. Nice to park a gimbal head on a nest and hang out until something happens and know that the focus is still on the nest (or insert whatever here).
I use one with my Sony 200-600 with no issues.Can fluid heads be used with large telephotos?
setting 2 on the counterbalance seems about right with a 70-200vr2. Just a slight amount of stiction on the tilt axis but both axis are smooth and consistent. The counterbalance seems to be well "timed" to compensate for telephotos.Thanx Wes. How smooth and what settings are useable with the Z9 and say 70-200 Z or 100-400Z (smaller lighter teles)? You say counterbalance is "generally good". Then there is some creep? Sorry, I have no experience with fluid heads.
FlexShooter Pro Lever Black Ball Head I own this and it worked great several times when I also owned 600 f/4ECan the Flexshooter ball head be used with 600mm f4 lenses for still and video?
I've been using the Wimberley MonoGimbal head with my monopod and have been very happy with it. A big lens balances nicely on it.Wimberley MH-100 MonoGimbal Head for Monopods is what Steve uses. Waiting for mine to be delivered today. Steve has a video on how he uses it and why.
I can tell you it makes that combination makes no sense. The FlexShooter would just not work the way it does on a tripod. I believe people have tried to use a big Wimberley head on a monopod. I tried that and it didn't feel right. But the Wimberley mono gimbal which I have really does work well on a monopod.What about a flex shooter pro on a monopod instead of the Wimberley monogimbal? Anyone try that combo?
A Gimbal head is still the best choice for tracking BIFs.Is a gimbal the only sensible choice for bird photography?
I'm using a Z9 + 500pf.
Lighter the better.
Thanks.
Thank you Ivan. I guess it takes 3 legs to make that combo work then, which makes sense.I can tell you it makes that combination makes no sense. The FlexShooter would just not work the way it does on a tripod. I believe people have tried to use a big Wimberley head on a monopod. I tried that and it didn't feel right. But the Wimberley mono gimbal which I have really does work well on a monopod.
My Wimberley MH-100 Mono-Gimbal Head for Monopods arrived at 5:30pm. By 5:45, I opened the package and mounted the Wimberly on my monopod with my Z9 and my 200-400 F4. I found that the combination was well balanced and easy to maneuver as described in Steve's video. Can't wait to get out in the field.Wimberley MH-100 MonoGimbal Head for Monopods is what Steve uses. Waiting for mine to be delivered today. Steve has a video on how he uses it and why.
I also had used the Uniqball and never loved it. The Wimberley head was better. But the FlexShooter is much better than the Uniqball and for me works just about as well as the Wimberley. Very easy to balance big glass. And of course, the FlexShooter gives advantages over the Wimberley in that it is much lighter in weight and it also functions as a perfectly adequate ball head when using a camera with smaller lenses that do not have a tripod collar.I have an old Uniqball 45 which is a predecessor to the Flexshooter, I believe. Never got on with it that well because the friction level wouldn’t stay consistent. Is the Flexshooter better in that regard?