MarcS
Well-known member
Good for Nikon they are rolling down the curve all that technology they introduced with the z9 and z8.
Last edited:
If you would like to post, you'll need to register. Note that if you have a BCG store account, you'll need a new, separate account here (we keep the two sites separate for security purposes).
I expect we'll see those with a firmware update…after all the first is driven by the Expeed 7 and it's power and the second one seems like a no brainer as well. Might be that by the time they were trying to finalize the firmware it was too late to add the new to the other models options and still get all the regression testing done before release…or might be that they figure this is more of a consumer level body rather than a pro level body and the features were either unimportant for consumers or they wanted to differentiate it from the higher models.Thanks - and it does not have the dedicated subject detection mode for birds and it doe snot have Cycle AF areas (that one surprised me).
It's like with the Z8/9. Animal works with birds and (some) mammals, so you have to start with that. Doing birds in Animal mode is good, doing them in Bird mode is even better (Bird mode seems to be better at finding and sticking to a bird than normal Animal mode is).@Steve I wasn't clear on the differences between bird detection and animal detection in your mind. Where does the Z6iii do the same as the 8 or 9 vs where does it fall short?
It's been so long since I used a D6 I can't say for sure, but I'm included towards yes, it will be better than the D6.Do you think Z6lll will perform as good as the D6 ? I had one now sold... been using the Z9 and waiting for a mirror less low light camera.
Thank,
Chuck
Yes, it's required to active the subject detection systemGreat video @Steve - especially that body roll about 3:25 in. wow! Was that in the manual??
It supports HE, HE* - I was using it in normal lossless RAW though, hoping for early compatibility.Another great video @Steve
I did not hear anything about HE and HE*. I assume due to the same raw file size and increased buffer, these are required
I think it is a great camera but in the end I would be more interested if the camera was a z8 with a 24MP sensor. Of course it would cost more, perhaps a $1000, more but for me that would have been a better camera
I haven't looked to see and I'm too lazy to go over and pick up the body to check…but if you're in RAW are the precapture options just disabled? I could probably accept a FF jpeg for the pre takeoff shots if the remainder were still in RAW…but I'm guessing it doesn't work that way. I'm also quite confused why Nikon doesn't offer precapture in in RAW…the buffer in the Z8/9 is plenty for 4 or more seconds in RAW at 20FPS and while precapture isn't something I would use all the time…I would gladly accept the buffer hit of a second or half second to get it…and as a computer nerd I don't see any technical reason they couldn't just buffer the precapture period at the expense of using some of the buffer. There's got to be some technical reason they aren't doing that…but I'm darned if I can see one.Many thanks @Steve , a useful summary of the new features on the Z 6III and how it applies to Wildlife and helped me with my decision. I was wondering about selling my Z 9 for a Z 6III to compliment my Z 8 for low light. However, after seeing your review I am thinking there are just too many differences between the Z 6III and Z 8 and nothing extra special to justify the Z 6III. If the Z 6III had raw pre-capture I think I would have gone ahead with my plan and I feel a little disappointed after Nikon's teaser campaign about pre-capture.
True…but as you said in the video…it's a heckuva lot closer than it was.The Z6iii is a huge leap forward of the series, but it's still not a Z8
There must be something in the way various people shoot the body that causes these sorts of valid for them claims…while I've got 2xZ8 now I had an 8 and a 9 in April in Tanzania and even on the long day when I shot about 6,500 frames I barely got into the second battery on the Z8. I was shooting in 20FPS on both bodies and chose which to grab based on lens mounted to it (600PF or 100-400 and they switched between bodies a couple times)…but I did have the rear LCD off and didn't do much chimping on either body…and it's long been my practice since well before the Zs to turn the camera off except when shooting and not rely on standby. While nobody has really seen one of these yet…unless the partially stacked sensor or new EVF or LCD use a lot more power I would expect a Z6III to have at least as good battery life as a Z8. Rose was shooting a Z8 on the trip as well with a lot of video and while she used a second battery I'm not sure she ever got to the third one…and she wasn't griping about battery life so I guess she was happy with it. And as I said in another reply…this body will be so much more useful for wildlife than my Z7II is that I might buy one despite my earlier reservations. The 7II is my walk around/tracel body but anything remotely resembling photography as a primary or even secondary mission goal for a trip would force me to the better bodies…and while I would still take the Z8s on a dedicated photo trip I can see a lot of mixed use trips where a Z6III would get the nod over a Z8 for weight/size reasons.Maybe poor is the wrong word. Folks I know with Z8s go through 3 batteries in a day's shooting.
Yes, it's required to active the subject detection system
If true, I'm in deep and serious troubleYes, it's required to active the subject detection system
Thank you much, Luke. I appreciate your input.In my opinion - that depends. If you're mainly photographing landscapes and very occasionally dabble in perched birds - Z7II will be great. If it's more wildlife / birds (especially BIF) - Z6III no questions asked. Expeed7 + nearly blackout free viewfinder + high resolution viewfinder alone will be so much worth it.
I have both Z6 and Z8 - and there's no comparison between the two, so if Z6III gets you close to AF performance of the Z8 (albeit at a lower resolution).... jump right in.
Thanks so much!I know you've heard this multiple times already, but I have to add my thanks for such a well done thoughtful review. Your work is amazing, especially considering the very short time you had possession of the 6iii. Thank you!
Thank you Steve, awesome video ...I shoot a lot on evening wildlife and the D6 was great, but now gone ... Z9 and Z8 now...could be me but iso climbs fast when the sun sets lolIt's been so long since I used a D6 I can't say for sure, but I'm included towards yes, it will be better than the D6.
Here's another thank you for your excellent review of the Z6iii. Before I watched it I was afraid I was going to regret having got the Zf a few months ago. But I called it right in my mind. I thought it would not be that much different in the things that are important to me and your video confirmed it. I've never thought the viewfinder in the Zf needed improvement so I don't care about an improved viewfinder. Yes, it would be nice to have a couple of more function buttons but I can live without that. Most important to me is excellent AF including subject detection and low light and from what you are saying, it's the same as the Zf. I want a general all-round use camera, for travelling, street shots and portraits of family and friends. The Zf is perfect for me for those reasons. I love the retro look and when I want to use it with a telephoto, I can use a grip attached. But I have no doubt, the Z6iii will appeal to many Nikon users.
it isn't just AU. Jared P got it for two days, Hudson Henry got it for zero.Another good review to complement Steve's review. Steve should complain to Nikon USA....Nikon Australia gets their influencers the cameras for a lot longer period of time.
LOL, I have I've told them to give me a week with it, that's all - I could really work up a review thenSteve should complain to Nikon USA....Nikon Australia gets their influencers the cameras for a lot longer period of time.