I appreciate everyone’s opinions and comparing Nikon to Sony etc but at the end of the day I have ZERO desire to go backwards to Nikon nor do I see any value in shooting two systems since I already have Sony.
I wouldn’t expect the 300GM to make anyone switch just as the 600PF wouldn’t make me want to switch.
Each brand has solutions for smaller and lighter between primes and zooms. Each brand has compromises but changing or adding systems based on one lens just doesn’t make sense to me.
I wouldn’t expect the 300GM to make anyone switch just as the 600PF wouldn’t make me want to switch.
Each brand has solutions for smaller and lighter between primes and zooms. Each brand has compromises but changing or adding systems based on one lens just doesn’t make sense to me.
Last edited: