bcgnz
Active member
Thanks - the 10-384 is cheaper right? Should I wait for that since it’s not like this is urgent..
If you would like to post, you'll need to register. Note that if you have a BCG store account, you'll need a new, separate account here (we keep the two sites separate for security purposes).
Thanks - the 10-384 is cheaper right? Should I wait for that since it’s not like this is urgent..
Been waiting for this post....and unfortunately, like you, more indecisive than before. I has hoping the AGM was going to be a slam-dunk, especially since I already returned the Topdon. Maybe my owl/bird specimens here have special stealth/cloaking capabilities because I could never get a standout signature???I'm struggling with my decision between the AGM 15-384 V2 and the Topdon TS004. That sounds crazy as on paper the 15-384 should be better in every way. And like for like it is better in every way (other than that annoying USB-C charging). The AGM has a way better image off the 384 sensor, you can see what the scene and know what bush or tree you are actually looking at where the 256 sensors (especially in low light) are very difficult to tell. It has a wider FOV than the Topdon which I find ideal. I found the 10-256 a little too wide to really tell what was a subject if it wasn't very close.
But the Topdon's "Bird Mode" on top of the regular white hot, black hot, color and red hot modes that both models have is actually more effective in finding birds. The Bird mode basically darkens everything but the hottest signal and it then seems to boost that top signal to a very white image. I will post some captures I took of my daddy GHO from yesterday morning. Yes I could see him in both models but if I was scanning an area I didn't know I may have missed him with the AGM. With the Topdon he stood out and you'd never miss him if you had him in the VF.
First example is a Barred Owl later that morning (for some reason the AGM image didn't save??). 2nd examples are the GHO before sunrise.
Did you see how the GGO looked on some of the other settings like Red Hot? I haven't found much use for the color setting. Usually too hard to differentiate things.Am I missing something here? Seems y'all have pretty good success with thermals, while I on the other hand have not had as much success. Maybe I should've gone with a higher end model? I'm less than impressed with the AGM TM10-256 I got. This is a great grey owl, doesn't really stand out like some of the images I've seen from others on here. It was 4:50pm as the image shows, maybe very low teens for the temperature.
View attachment 108671
Am I missing something here? Seems y'all have pretty good success with thermals, while I on the other hand have not had as much success. Maybe I should've gone with a higher end model? I'm less than impressed with the AGM TM10-256 I got. This is a great grey owl, doesn't really stand out like some of the images I've seen from others on here. It was 4:50pm as the image shows, maybe very low teens for the temperature.
Which setting (white, black, red, color) do you find the best? I've mostly been using red with the 15-384.I find red hot to be the worst one for trying to find birds. I have a couple of thoughts about your situation:
- The TM10-256 is just the cheapest, most easily affordable thermal. I wouldn't expect good results with it.
- It looks to me like the whole scene was heated up - were you in broad sunlight? If so, that result is similar to what I'd expect even with a more expensive monocular.
- Did you try different angles of view? Often times if my whole image is showing heat, I need to tilt the monocular up or down to try and cut away some of the sun.
Which setting (white, black, red, color) do you find the best? I've mostly been using red with the 15-384.
Got to say though...nothing compares to the Topdon Bird mode....would love AGM to add something like that.
The last photo. The banding as you describe it is something that happens when the thermal has been in use for a while.Yeah, the TM10-256 has left me quite underwhelmed with thermals, pretty sure as soon as the TM15-384 is back in stock at B&H I'll probably be getting that one. As far as your #2 and #3 points, Nick, it was later afternoon but pretty cold out, thinking maybe lower single digits.
The other issue I've seen with mine is some pretty bad banding, or vertical lines. Only thing that helps is a restart. Is this normal or do I have a bad sample?
View attachment 108715
I'm not sure if I'm yet ready to spend thousands on a higher end unit, but I'm also not sure if I want to spend $1000 on the AGM if it's perhaps only marginally better than the much cheaper Topdon. I think I'd almost prefer to see if I can find some utility with a cheap model and if so then splurge later. Your AGM is the first version, right? Not the V2?Which setting (white, black, red, color) do you find the best? I've mostly been using red with the 15-384.
Got to say though...nothing compares to the Topdon Bird mode....would love AGM to add something like that.
My 15-384 is the V2 with the user replaceable batteries. My 10-256 I had and returned was the V1.I'm not sure if I'm yet ready to spend thousands on a higher end unit, but I'm also not sure if I want to spend $1000 on the AGM if it's perhaps only marginally better than the much cheaper Topdon. I think I'd almost prefer to see if I can find some utility with a cheap model and if so then splurge later. Your AGM is the first version, right? Not the V2?
Some examples of what I found yesterday morning via the AGM 15-384...
Thermo view of the hummer nest way up there!!
In my limited experience with two AGM units and the Topdon I would say that once the sky is in the shot the usefulness of the thermal goes way down. Especially scanning high tree tops...the Topdon actually does better scanning tall trees agains the sky than either AGM unit. I've had mostly cloudy skies and have been going out before first light but when I have tried it with sunlight going through the trees it also seems much less useful as you get so many distracting signals from just sunbeams sides of trees in the sun vs those in the shade.I bought a Topdon TS004 to try it out. I'll report more later, but I'm expecting my experience to be less successful already since I live in the desert. Just out a few minutes with it at about 58 degrees right at sunrise I noticed that once I tilt it up beyond just a few degrees Red Hot becomes mostly useless. Major edges of everything become red, even edges in shadows. My assumption is because more of the cooler sky is in the view everything else starts to look hot by comparison. Is this behavior when looking up typical of even the higher end models?
Some good rain and cloudy periods up coming so I intend to try it out then and well before dawn. Red Hot is picking up some small birds so far with my brief test if I keep it mostly level with the ground. Bird mode has not made any birds pop yet, although I did see how well it could work using a family member as a guinea pig. There may have to be a much stronger temp differential with the environment to make it work on smaller targets. Will report more later in case it helps anyone else. The FOV of the Topdon seems ok to me for where I would generally use it, but I could see it being more tedious in dense forests.
@nmerc_photos , have you ever used the brightness and contrast controls in "User Mode" on your Pulsar units? I don't know if the Helicon XP28 has that feature, but it looks like the Telos XP50 does according to the manual. Is it useful at all as implemented?