Cameron T
Well-known member
I don't believe that's the case, because as far as I know the z8 uses the same sled. I could very well be wrong though.
Rumors: New Nikon Z9 Firmware Update With Enhanced AF Acquisition Coming Soon (or not 🙂)
- Thread starter JAJohnson
- Start date
If you would like to post, you'll need to register. Note that if you have a BCG store account, you'll need a new, separate account here (we keep the two sites separate for security purposes).
Parfumeur
Active member
RichF: Not a guess, and educated guess, from experience! I think the Z9 has memory issues, or lack thereof.
Can't even save the setting file in body for quick retrieval and restore to YOUR defaults.
Can't even save the setting file in body for quick retrieval and restore to YOUR defaults.
John Navitsky
Well-known member
+1. note there are other features that haven’t come yet that seem like they almost certainly will, like the cloud stuff.
John Navitsky
Well-known member
Parfumeur
Active member
?? Each shift contains a full frame. Most likely, 4 or more frames (see OM system for implementation).
Then each capture has to be combined AND stored then fed to a card.
What do you think from experience about the final size and storage of the resultant file? How much dynamic memory would be needed to handle the data?
John Navitsky
Well-known member
ah, i see. buffer is what, 20 frames? so, yah, maybe that is an issue for that specific feature.
John Navitsky
Well-known member
if so, that might mean maximum possible shift would be four frames
Parfumeur
Active member
Not only do we have a buffer size (memory), but the data handling, heat generated, speed of computations. This is not a Nikon issue, but current state of the art of micro processors. OM systems can do it. as there is less data to handle. Solution: Take pano and stich in post.
ptgui.com
Creating gigapixel panoramas with a robotic panohead - PTGui Stitching Software
PTGui is image stitching software for stitching photographs into a seamless 360-degree spherical or gigapixel panoramic image
ptgui.com
Joel N
Well-known member
Nikon implementation of pixel shift is not done in camera. Is captured in camera and post processed via nx studio off camera.Not only do we have a buffer size (memory), but the data handling, heat generated, speed of computations. This is not a Nikon issue, but current state of the art of micro processors. OM systems can do it. as there is less data to handle. Solution: Take pano and stich in post.
Creating gigapixel panoramas with a robotic panohead - PTGui Stitching Software
PTGui is image stitching software for stitching photographs into a seamless 360-degree spherical or gigapixel panoramic image
John Navitsky
Well-known member
ah, right. and that’s probably why
Parfumeur
Active member
Ah! Now that is a possibilty. A clean easy implementation. BUT the results cannot be viewed in the field. Akin to stacking and processing when back at the studio.. Now on to the issue of using the IBIS to create 4 or more single files to be post processed. I'm not familiar with the tech data, but I read some use color selective pixel saving. I'll bow out, as this is not my area of expertise - how the files and pixels are combined in pixel shift.
The processing is done in post, and relative to recording internal 8k RAW this is childplay. If the sensor can be moved in such manner.Not only do we have a buffer size (memory), but the data handling, heat generated, speed of computations. This is not a Nikon issue, but current state of the art of micro processors. OM systems can do it. as there is less data to handle. Solution: Take pano and stich in post.
Creating gigapixel panoramas with a robotic panohead - PTGui Stitching Software
PTGui is image stitching software for stitching photographs into a seamless 360-degree spherical or gigapixel panoramic image
Perhaps Nikon wants to keep the Z9 and Z8 differentiated in terms of functionality. Or, there might be some other reason. But I’ve been told by Nikon personnel that the sensor and supporting hardware is identical.
I have not had too many reasons to ever use pixel-shifting and I view it as a gimmick to help market small sensors, so I agree it's not at all important to the 8 and 9. I tried it on my (now sold) Zf, and it works as advertised.
Same here. I tried it on my Zf (also sold) and later on my Z8 while shooting landscapes. The detail in the resulting images was impressive. It’s nice to know it’s there if I need it but it isn’t something I’m going to use often.
Parfumeur
Active member
Not having a Z8, I was not aware it did pixel shifting. Checked on line the feature, and it is done in post.
www.photoartfromscience.com
Nice, Im impressed. Maybe now on my GAS list! Thank you for making me aware.
Pixel Shift Shooting Analysis of the Nikon Z8
Tutorial on using the new Nikon Z8 pixel-shift shooting feature. Includes an analysis of actual resolution increase to expect.
www.photoartfromscience.com
Nice, Im impressed. Maybe now on my GAS list! Thank you for making me aware.
Lee R
Active member
From the few images I’ve taken with my Zf and Z8 you can get some high detail but absolutely massive RAW file sizes that can be a bit slow to work with. Think 800-900+mb per image.
Maybe for landscape shooting it would be useful but I have not found pixel shift to be much use so far.
Henry Hudson did a comparison between pixel shift and adobe super resolution which was interesting and made pixel shift look a lot less necessary as a feature.
Maybe for landscape shooting it would be useful but I have not found pixel shift to be much use so far.
Henry Hudson did a comparison between pixel shift and adobe super resolution which was interesting and made pixel shift look a lot less necessary as a feature.
Parfumeur
Active member
Yes, landscapes for murals.
Lee R
Active member
That would be a good use case. I was thinking nightscapes for lower noise or for studio product shots or still life as well. I suppose portraits too if people are still.