If you would like to post, you'll need to register. Note that if you have a BCG store account, you'll need a new, separate account here (we keep the two sites separate for security purposes).
I think that we need somthing like Hot Deals or Ongoing Trips or Hot Trips or Hot Workshops or something like that for the situation if for example, somebody from your own workshop suddenly cannot participate and you have a free spot and need to find someone immediately. Or if somebody is looking for people to join the itinerary. Or if there is a great deal what is not in concurence to your workshops and people can be intrested in it or other hot news like some country is closed, something what shall grab the attention of others.I'm also going to put in a prefix requirement as well - for Trip Reports, Questions, Hotspots, Gear, etc
I don't really think this site should get into the business of advertising for or serving as a clearing house for commercial photo tours. Members sharing location info is great but I'd strongly urge us to stay away from advertising, endorsing or otherwise serving as a vehicle for photo tours not run by Steve and BCG. For one thing it implies support of those tours and tour leaders and their methods which may or may not be the case.I think that we need somthing like Hot Deals or Ongoing Trips or Hot Trips or Hot Workshops or something like that for the situation if for example, somebody from your own workshop suddenly cannot participate and you have a free spot and need to find someone immediately. Or if somebody is looking for people to join the itinerary. Or if there is a great deal what is not in concurence to your workshops and people can be intrested in it or other hot news like some country is closed, something what shall grab the attention of others.
Agree! But those from BCG shall be advertised. Any time I look at them they are fully booked ;-)Just my 2 cents but I'd recommend not getting into advertising, or otherwise supporting commercial photo tours unless they happen to be run by the site owners here
Good list, Bill.Yellowstone
Grand Teton National Park
Rocky Mountain National Park
Glacier National Park
Mount Ranier National Park
Olympic National Park
Arches National Park
Zion National Park
Magee Marsh
Kearney
Bosque del Apache
I agree. I could make a similar argument about Florida and perhaps Gulf coast regions in Texas.Too much detail can make it hard to find the right topic. For example, instead of Costa Rica use Central America. I had a great bird photography trip to Panama this year. Where the destinations are within easy driving distance it might make sense to combine them. Another example, Mt Rainier, and Olympic National Parks along with North Cascades Wilderness, Mt. St. Helens and Mt. Hood might all fit under Pacific Northwest Mountains and Volcanoes. In southern Oregon and Northern California there are some great winter raptor locations in several wildlife refuges. Rather than listing each refuge it might be easier to find Klamath Falls Oregon Area. I have had some awesome adventures along the British Columbia Coast and around Vanouver Island, birds, bears and marine mammals. Possibly combine British Columbia and Alaska for those of us who don't mind being wet and cold. Just my opinion.
Too much detail can make it hard to find the right topic. For example, instead of Costa Rica use Central America. I had a great bird photography trip to Panama this year. Where the destinations are within easy driving distance it might make sense to combine them. Another example, Mt Rainier, and Olympic National Parks along with North Cascades Wilderness, Mt. St. Helens and Mt. Hood might all fit under Pacific Northwest Mountains and Volcanoes. In southern Oregon and Northern California there are some great winter raptor locations in several wildlife refuges. Rather than listing each refuge it might be easier to find Klamath Falls Oregon Area. I have had some awesome adventures along the British Columbia Coast and around Vanouver Island, birds, bears and marine mammals. Possibly combine British Columbia and Alaska for those of us who don't mind being wet and cold. Just my opinion.
I agree. I could make a similar argument about Florida and perhaps Gulf coast regions in Texas.
Even so, I suspect this forum will be a work in progress. I’m willing to see what @Steve has developed and suggest changes over time as members use the forum.
Sounds good to me!My idea, such as it is, it that we wouldn't try to cover every location, but rather the places that seem to come up all the time and how they come up. For instance, often people go to YNP and TNP together, so that's one, but when they do FL parks, it's usually just a blanket "I'm going to FL" kind of post. My idea is that it would be nice to have a filter for popular locations so when people are looking for info they can filter by that location can get all the relevant threads. The trick is managing to not go overboard and try to squeeze in every location, but rather just the popular ones.
For instance, although I like Roosevelt NP, we don't get a lot of threads about it so I wouldn't put it on that list. That doesn't mean there can't be a topic or two about it, of course. And it would still be searchable as well. However, since we get YNP questions almost daily, I think having it in the popular park category isn't a bad idea
And like you say, we can adjust as we go and make it streamlined.Sounds good to me!
Tags don't work well since everything calls it something different. One person puts YNP, one Yellowstone, another Yellow Stone, etc. With more fixed options, everything that has to do with a particular popular park is covered. Not that you can't have both - as in the case of less popular places.My two cents. We may not need too many individual parks listed, since they can be listed in the title (and they will still have a region prefix). Plus some reports may include a park but include other areas beyond it, in which case region is a more appropriate prefix anyway. What about just using specific parks in the tags instead of as a prefix?
Steve you probably know this but Chat GPT is quite good at generating lists for tagging that you can build and copy paste quickly, including common misspelling and acronyms per the initial command request. It may be helpful for your future tagging purposes.Tags don't work well since everything calls it something different. One person puts YNP, one Yellowstone, another Yellow Stone, etc. With more fixed options, everything that has to do with a particular popular park is covered. Not that you can't have both - as in the case of less popular places.
The problem is that tags are typed in by the poster, so differences and misspellings happen. The custom fields I'm using will be consistent.Steve you probably know this but Chat GPT is quite good at generating lists for tagging that you can build and copy paste quickly, including common misspelling and acronyms per the initial command request. It may be helpful for your future tagging purposes.
At the moment Africa is just a region in the system, like North America, Europe, etc.Destinations in Africa will be split by countries? And not by parks or areas, I assume?
Places to stay (not motels but areas),I'm working on the forum and have it mostly done. Right now, I have two custom fields with different values - one for region (like North America South America, etc.) and another for popular parks / areas in the North America (since 90%+ of the questions seem to be about the US/Canada). These include popular parks we see all the time- Yellowstone, smokies, etc.
I'm also going to put in a prefix requirement as well - for Trip Reports, Questions, Hotspots, Gear, etc. These will be a drop box before the topic to help narrow things down even more and you'll be able to filter them as well.
The idea is that anyone searching can quickly narrow down the topic list to the type, area, and even park they are interested in very quickly.
I need help with two things:
1. What are some popular parks that are always coming up here in the forums that should be in the popular parks list? (We don't want every park or the filtering process will become unwieldily - but we do want to cover the top 10 or 15.)
2. Do you have any additional thoughts on prefixes beyond what I mentioned?
Thanks in advance. Once I have answers to the above questions I'll make the forum live.
Also smokies, areas in Maine , UP, and northern MinnesotaDestinations:
Bosque del Apache
Florida
Alaska
How is Hotspots different than Destinations?
My impressions are that the participants are better behaved, as well.Agree with above, it would be something for moderators to keep an eye on. BTW this forum is more well moderated than some others, so I appreciate their work.
There is also a forum here for Landscape Presentation.But this is a WILDLIFE forum...there are many other travel forums out there on the web that people can go to.
Yes, thanks for the reminder. Steve is a wildlife photographer, led wildlife photo tours, calls himself a wildlife photographer so I always think of that first. As a wildlife photographer who joined the forum because it was billed as a wildlife forum I do forget about the nature and landscape shots at time. I think I do need to get back to doing more of that and I do some of that when I travel, but I travel mainly for wildlife.There is also a forum here for Landscape Presentation.
I totally understand where you are with this. I got really interested in photography years ago taking what we called "scenics." I was just a teenager using my Dad's Yashica 35mm rangefinder, and I just loved it, especially when my Mom had one of my shots printed and framed at 8 x 10. The shot wasn't really very good, but Mom gave the praise that only a mother can give, and encouraged me, even buying me a roll of film every now and then. As for my father's support, that camera was a big expenditure for him, but he never, not once, refused to let me borrow it.Yes, thanks for the reminder. Steve is a wildlife photographer, led wildlife photo tours, calls himself a wildlife photographer so I always think of that first. As a wildlife photographer who joined the forum because it was billed as a wildlife forum I do forget about the nature and landscape shots at time. I think I do need to get back to doing more of that and I do some of that when I travel, but I travel mainly for wildlife.
I don't wish to be rude but to me it looks as if most members don't/can't think beyond the USA, and not realising there is a lot more to the world than theirs. ,For example places my wife and I have been to
Brazil-Egypt- Tunisia-Spain- Italy- Germany-Greece- Portugal-Iceland- Norway- Faroe isle- USA- Caribbean islands-Sicily- Brittany- China-Japan Argentina- some more than once to name but a few.
There is a lot of wildlife to be found in each that are native to one country only
In brazil as two examples both completely wild. the first beside a park cafe and the second where we were staying at my D-In-L's house
In the carribean
Norway
egypt
I like this idea! Destination as title makes it searchable.I think it might be helpful to have sub-forms by continent to make browsing easier.
And set the destination as the title.....?